Oh well

On 7-Aug-2008, Wayne Knight wrote:

Dishonorable conduct? You have a beef with certain posters so you
decide to innudate us with multiple posts that say the same thing,
most of it gibberish and you want to talk about dishonorable conduct.
Your behavior these past few days borders on some the most infantile
crap most of us have ever seen from a reputed adult. But at the end of
the day, we can no more control Ken than we can control you.

We operate in a free environment and those of us in America, at least,
value our freedoms, one of which is the freedom of speech. The Ken and
you got into offer remarks you made about Gays in Europe does not make
things dishonorable here. Your comments, however they were intended,
came across as homophobic and Ken never has been afraid to express his
opinion and you played right into it. Personally I think most of the
problems result from cultural differences that most of us have not
experienced nor we have any comprehension of it.

Much the same way you played into with Gehrke or any other numerous
other spats over the years. Hell, I remember you called me ":stupid"
for disagreeing with one of your fishing assertions once. Before you
call me a liar, remember there is a large archive of posts on google.

Ken plays you like a fiddle and you walk right into it. What I do or
don't do has nothing to do with it. You own your website and the
content, you don't own ROFF nor do you own ROFFT. And you know darn
well you are pushing if not exceeding the boundaries of the terms of
participation for most internet isps and websites over some perceived
slight.

As others have said, you take this stuff way too seriously. Your fly
fishing jones goes beyond what most of us here think as normal, but at
the same time the olympics will soon be upon us with people that did
nothing but practice their sports for years for this chance to
participate. When you';re as serious as you are about something, it
becomes hard to see the forest for the trees and to bring the level
you are imparting to the level of the person you are consulting. Your
fly line splicing is a perfect example. Most of us don't need to
playing with heads to fish the waters we fish over here. Maybe how and
where you fish it is important, and good for you that you can do it.
That I don't doesn't mean anything more than I don't make and use
shooting heads.



A rational appeal

Will it work?

I hope so
but I think not

There's a line from a song "one step over the line"
I think that we already are miles from that.

I hope that I am wrong.

Fred

On Aug 8, 7:52*am, "Fred" wrote:
On *7-Aug-2008, Wayne Knight wrote:



Dishonorable conduct? You have a beef with certain posters so you
decide to innudate us with multiple posts that say the same thing,
most of it gibberish and you want to talk about dishonorable conduct.
Your behavior these past few days borders on some the most infantile
crap most of us have ever seen from a reputed adult. But at the end of
the day, we can no more control Ken than we can control you.

We operate in a free environment and those of us in America, at least,
value our freedoms, one of which is the freedom of speech. The Ken and
you got into offer remarks you made about Gays in Europe does not make
things dishonorable here. Your comments, however they were intended,
came across as homophobic and Ken never has been afraid to express his
opinion and you played right into it. Personally I think most of the
problems result from cultural differences that most of us have not
experienced nor we have any comprehension of it.

Much the same way you played into with Gehrke or any other numerous
other spats over the years. Hell, I remember you called me ":stupid"
for disagreeing with one of your fishing assertions once. Before you
call me a liar, remember there is a large archive of posts on google.

Ken plays you like a fiddle and you walk right into it. What I do or
don't do has nothing to do with it. You own your website and the
content, you don't own ROFF nor do you own ROFFT. And you know darn
well you are pushing if not exceeding the boundaries of the terms of
participation for most internet isps and websites over some perceived
slight.

As others have said, you take this stuff way too seriously. Your fly
fishing jones goes beyond what most of us here think as normal, but at
the same time the olympics will soon be upon us with people that did
nothing but practice their sports for years for this chance to
participate. When you';re as serious as you are about something, it
becomes hard to see the forest for the trees and to bring the level
you are imparting to the level of the person you are consulting. Your
fly line splicing is a perfect example. Most of us don't need to
playing with heads to fish the waters we fish over here. Maybe how and
where you fish it is important, and good for you that you can do it.
That I don't doesn't mean anything more than I don't make and use
shooting heads.

A rational appeal

Will it work?

I hope so
but I think not

There's a line from a song "one step over the line"
I think that we already are miles from that.

I hope that I am wrong.

Fred

It had worked Fred, reagrdless of what you think or believe, my
apology was sincere, and I had simply left. But that mother****er
Forteneberry simply started again.

he is a lying dishonourable piece of stinking ****e, and I am going to
keep on telling everybody that for as long as I have the wherewithal
to do so.

As I told you before, iof you don´t like it, then **** off.

Mike Connor

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

It had worked Fred, reagrdless of what you think or believe, my
apology was sincere, and I had simply left. But that mother****er
Forteneberry simply started again.

Go back, Mike, and read the posts. Fortenberry said nothing about
your apology. Others did and you went off your rocker again. It was
only then that Fortenberry came aboard. Fortenberry did not start
this latest brouhaha.

Dave

On Aug 9, 4:41*am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
It had worked Fred, reagrdless of what you think or believe, my
apology was sincere, and I had simply left. But that mother****er
Forteneberry simply started again.

Go back, Mike, and read the posts. *Fortenberry said nothing about
your apology. *Others did and you went off your rocker again. *It was
only then that Fortenberry came aboard. *Fortenberry did not start
this latest brouhaha.

Dave

I thought you had noticed by now that I had ceased replying to your
rubbish?

Not because I think you are evil or a piece of disgusting lying ****e
like your mate Fortenberry, but because I think you are just too
****ing stupid to waste any time on.

Everything you post merely serves to confirm my analysis.

**** off LaCourse, I don´t give a **** what you think or write.

Mike Connor

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:45:32 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 9, 4:41*am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
It had worked Fred, reagrdless of what you think or believe, my
apology was sincere, and I had simply left. But that mother****er
Forteneberry simply started again.

Go back, Mike, and read the posts. *Fortenberry said nothing about
your apology. *Others did and you went off your rocker again. *It was
only then that Fortenberry came aboard. *Fortenberry did not start
this latest brouhaha.

Dave

I thought you had noticed by now that I had ceased replying to your
rubbish?

Not because I think you are evil or a piece of disgusting lying ****e
like your mate Fortenberry, but because I think you are just too
****ing stupid to waste any time on.

Everything you post merely serves to confirm my analysis.

**** off LaCourse, I don´t give a **** what you think or write.

Mike Connor

Take your meds, Mike. This hatred is going to kill you.

Dave