![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any bets? Will it hit? Will David Paulison do "a heckuva job"...?
Stay tuned. --riverman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote: Any bets? You're on. How much? Will it hit? No. Ball's in your court, R Will David Paulison do "a heckuva job"...? Stay tuned. --riverman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 4:18*am, riverman wrote:
Any bets? Will it hit? Will David Paulison do "a heckuva job"...? Stay tuned. Well, I'm looking for Gustav to nail the oil fields in the Gulf (about a 100 miles west of New Orleans) head on and then come up to Nebraska as a disapated low for some brats, saurkraut and beer (washing my fancy grass seed down to Missouri). Back at the ranch, Hanna, now called TD08 is gonna take Florida by storm, crushing Miami in a vise. Fill up your gas cans now, sit back and watch how the administration handles a disaster in a city that the right actually cares about. Frank Reid You heard it here first |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 8:17*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: Any bets? You're on. *How much? Will it hit? No. Ball's in your court, R And considering how much the predicted path has shifted west in the last few hours, I withdraw my bet. (sheepish grin) Still, it could be worse. I could have won.... --riverman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 9:14*pm, riverman wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:17*pm, wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: Any bets? You're on. *How much? Will it hit? No. Ball's in your court, R And considering how much the predicted path has shifted west in the last few hours, I withdraw my bet. (sheepish grin) Still, it could be worse. I could have won.... --riverman Shoulda hung in there for the bet, but in any case, the NOAA website only puts a 50% prob of a storm surge of 5+ feet in NO. In any case, here's a webcam on Bourbon St. http://www.tropicalisle.com/webcam.html --riverman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 05:13:05 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote: On Aug 28, 9:14*pm, riverman wrote: On Aug 28, 8:17*pm, wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: Any bets? You're on. *How much? Will it hit? No. Ball's in your court, R And considering how much the predicted path has shifted west in the last few hours, I withdraw my bet. (sheepish grin) Still, it could be worse. I could have won.... --riverman Shoulda hung in there for the bet, And you would have lost - it's essentially a sucker bet. It is all but impossible for a hurricane to hit at New Orleans - it would have to come up the Mississippi or weave up through the Rigolets, etc., into Pontchartrain and suddenly hook down. Even Houma really isn't accurate (it's inland), but it's more readily identifiable than "'bout out dere whe' Sammy Mitot and Paul Broussard...no, no, no, da son, not da daddy - he still mad to Sammy...caught all dem specs last week" to y'all folks that don't know Sammy and Paul...or his daddy... but in any case, the NOAA website only puts a 50% prob of a storm surge of 5+ feet in NO. There is 0% chance of such a thing. Where did you see this? That's just ridiculous, crazy, and dangerous information to put out (them, not you, as you'd have no way of knowing whether it was accurate). In any case, here's a webcam on Bourbon St. http://www.tropicalisle.com/webcam.html And there are several more at nola.com (about the best starting point for NO info, including the Times-Picayune. A lot of the city has power out right now, so only some of the cams are working. But as of right now, the Quarter/Vieux Carre is OK, as is the Garden District, Uptown, and up St. Charles. --riverman TC, R |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:07:36 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: ... And there are several more at nola.com (about the best starting point for NO info, including the Times-Picayune. A lot of the city has power out right now, so only some of the cams are working. But as of right now, the Quarter/Vieux Carre is OK, as is the Garden District, Uptown, and up St. Charles. Good to hear it. We hope your Mom is OK and your place weathers the storm. Kristine was asking about you guys last night. Actually, we shut down her house and our place, and she came over to our place in MS. From what I've seen of the area (from NO to MS), there is little real damage and thankfully, the chances of there being any is dropping literally by the minute. Thank Kristine, and K and Tasha say howdy to all. TC, R |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 1, 10:58*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 05:13:05 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: Shoulda hung in there for the bet, And you would have lost - it's essentially a sucker bet. *It is all but impossible for a hurricane to hit at New Orleans - it would have to come up the Mississippi or weave up through the Rigolets, etc., into Pontchartrain and suddenly hook down. * How's that? Are you saying that a storm would have weakened to below Cat 1 levels by the time it had moved that far inland? I can't imagine a hurricane moving 'up the Mississippi'...that would be like saying 'drive a cadillac through the eye of a needle'. but in any case, the NOAA website only puts a 50% prob of a storm surge of 5+ feet in NO. There is 0% chance of such a thing. * Where did you see this? *That's just ridiculous, crazy, and dangerous information to put out (them, not you, as you'd have no way of knowing whether it was accurate). http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/psurgegraphics_at2.shtml This link is time-ended, as its a real-time feed. You can zoom in with your mouse. As far as accuracy, I tend to trust the forecasters at NOAA more than Geraldo or the average newscast weatherman. Again, you don't usually make statements without real supporting evidence: why would it be impossible for a storm surge to reach NO? --riverman |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:12:11 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote: On Sep 1, 10:58*pm, wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 05:13:05 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote: Shoulda hung in there for the bet, And you would have lost - it's essentially a sucker bet. *It is all but impossible for a hurricane to hit at New Orleans - it would have to come up the Mississippi or weave up through the Rigolets, etc., into Pontchartrain and suddenly hook down. * How's that? Are you saying that a storm would have weakened to below Cat 1 levels by the time it had moved that far inland? I can't imagine a hurricane moving 'up the Mississippi'...that would be like saying 'drive a cadillac through the eye of a needle'. Ah...if you meant a hurricane passing over NO, sure, that's possible, but when most folks say "hit" in hurricane areas, they mean "make official landfall." As such, for NO to be "hit," the two scenarios I mentioned are the only ways for it to occur. And you are correct in that it would extremely unlikely (really, just about, but absolutely, impossible) for a hurricane's official position to follow the river. It would be just as unlikely for it to come through the Rigolets, too. But if by "hit" you simply mean "have some form of weather influenced by a hurricane," then most of the southern US is "hit" by any hurricane in the Gulf. but in any case, the NOAA website only puts a 50% prob of a storm surge of 5+ feet in NO. There is 0% chance of such a thing. * Where did you see this? *That's just ridiculous, crazy, and dangerous information to put out (them, not you, as you'd have no way of knowing whether it was accurate). http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/psurgegraphics_at2.shtml This link is time-ended, as its a real-time feed. You can zoom in with your mouse. As far as accuracy, I tend to trust the forecasters at NOAA more than Geraldo or the average newscast weatherman. Ah. When I went, most of NO what I assume was the 0% chance (the "base" color) with the river having a higher chance. But even Katrina didn't put 5'-plus feet in all of NO, nor have I ever seen a storm that would. Again, we may be talking a difference in terminology here. If you mean 5' or more of water anywhere within the city limits, then sure - heck, some heavy rainstorms probably do that. There are areas on the MS coast that had that, too, but I've not heard any reports of any area of homes or businesses in NO or even St. Bernard Parish being what most would call "flooded." Again, you don't usually make statements without real supporting evidence: why would it be impossible for a storm surge to reach NO? I didn't say it would be impossible, just that it certainly didn't appear to be a 50% (or even a .05% chance) of NO getting 5-plus feet of surge with this. While I wouldn't have wanted to be in Houma in a tent, this wasn't much as serious hurricanes go, and when compared to Katrina, it was little more than a summer shower. For example, for those following this on the news, if you hear mention of "Diamondhead" (essentially, Bay St. Louis, MS), it had about 32 feet of surge during Katrina. I've heard it had about 6 feet with Gustav. TC, R --riverman |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Orleans Thinkin | wcrbudox | General Discussion | 8 | September 6th, 2005 08:22 AM |
Angler Alert! Monday - Oct. 11, 2004 | [email protected] | Saltwater Fishing | 2 | October 12th, 2004 10:06 PM |
Penns report, Monday night, ...Martini night. | Asadi | Fly Fishing | 8 | May 26th, 2004 11:57 AM |
Monday 6 Oct Report | TidalFish.com | General Discussion | 0 | October 8th, 2003 02:58 AM |