Well, now...

On Sep 4, 7:37*am, wrote:

She is on tape gushing over all the earmarked pork she got with the
help of Rep. Young (Indited) and Sen Stevens (On trial). And its a
matter of record that she did not turn back the $217 million pork pie
of Federal taxpayer money for the bridge to no-whe Fact, She kept
it and distributed to her own set of pork projects. Facts that the
vetting team did not get to the speech writing team in time to cut
from the speech. :

@)))))) What a TV ad that is going to make. Remember Richard, its not
only Texans who have trouble with that veracity thingy.

Dave

wrote:
On Sep 4, 7:37 am, wrote:

She is on tape gushing over all the earmarked pork she got with the
help of Rep. Young (Indited) and Sen Stevens (On trial). And its a
matter of record that she did not turn back the $217 million pork pie
of Federal taxpayer money for the bridge to no-whe Fact, She kept
it and distributed to her own set of pork projects. Facts that the
vetting team did not get to the speech writing team in time to cut
from the speech. :

@)))))) What a TV ad that is going to make. Remember Richard, its not
only Texans who have trouble with that veracity thingy.

Dave

....your inability to spell simple words does not help your veracity and
your rabid political BS is further proof that
education does not confer common sense. Those liberal profs apparently
poked a lot of bull**** in your mush brains.

Frank Sr.

"Frank Church" wrote in message
news:aQSvk.407$Af3.126@trnddc06...
wrote:
On Sep 4, 7:37 am, wrote:

She is on tape gushing over all the earmarked pork she got with the
help of Rep. Young (Indited) and Sen Stevens (On trial). And its a
matter of record that she did not turn back the $217 million pork pie
of Federal taxpayer money for the bridge to no-whe Fact, She kept
it and distributed to her own set of pork projects. Facts that the
vetting team did not get to the speech writing team in time to cut
from the speech. :

@)))))) What a TV ad that is going to make. Remember Richard, its not
only Texans who have trouble with that veracity thingy.

Dave

...your inability to spell simple words does not help your veracity and
your rabid political BS is further proof that
education does not confer common sense. Those liberal profs apparently
poked a lot of bull**** in your mush brains.

Still, it's encouraging that this time around, as always, everyone here
remains single-mindedly focused on all of the large real issues, about which
they continue to display their characteristic breadth and depth of
knowledge.

Wolfgang
who knows that it ain't just everywhere a boy can go to find such a firm
grasp on the world geopolitical and economic scenes.......let alone such a
stellar selection of foolproof solutions to problems that escape everyone
else in the world.

On Sep 4, 8:06*am, Frank Church wrote:
wrote:

...your inability to spell simple words does not help your veracity and
your rabid political BS is further proof that
education does not confer common sense. Those liberal profs apparently
poked a lot of bull**** in your mush brains.

Frank Sr.

But of course you cannot dispute anything in my post. Can you?
Put up or shut up time. Or just **** into the wind like you just did.
Im going fishing for a few days. Lets see if you can actually learn
what happened in that time frame, given your superiority thingy.

We know a bit more about Alaskan politics up here in the Pacific NW.
Our papers and media actually cover Alaska. Do yours? Ive worked in
Alaskan and really like Alaskans in general. But their taste for
getting others to pay the bills is notorious. Claiming she and
Alaskans decry pork is hilarious. Just does not fly. As you are about
to learn.

Dave
BYU and Utah professors as liberals? Earth to Frank, Earth to Frank.

On Sep 4, 10:58*am, wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:06*am, Frank Church wrote:

wrote:

...your inability to spell simple words does not help your veracity and
your rabid political BS is further proof that
education does not confer common sense. Those liberal profs apparently
poked a lot of bull**** in your mush brains.

Frank Sr.

But of course you cannot dispute anything in my post. Can you?
Put up or shut up time. Or just **** into the wind like you just did.
Im going fishing for a few days. Lets see if you can actually learn
what happened in that time frame, given your superiority thingy.

We know a bit more about Alaskan politics up here in the Pacific NW.
Our papers and media actually cover Alaska. Do yours? Ive worked *in
Alaskan and really like Alaskans in general. But their taste for
getting others to pay the bills is notorious. Claiming she and
Alaskans decry pork is hilarious. *Just does not fly. As you are about
to learn.

Since you are informed about Alaska fiscal details, perhaps you can
expand on the information that, in the agreement preceding statehood,
the Alaskans said they didn't want to become wards of the federal
government, but couldn't see any way to avoid it, given their
industrial status. The Feds promised to unlock the land to allow for
the extraction of the resources that would allow the state to take
care of itself. You saw what it took to get the pipeline.
So far, other than that and some token teeth-pulling, it hasn't
happened. Unlock the land and AK will pay it all back, with interest.

cheers

oz, who understands that there is a reason the Forest Service is under
the Dept. of Agriculture

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 4, 7:37*am, wrote:

She is on tape gushing over all the earmarked pork she got with the
help of Rep. Young (Indited) and Sen Stevens (On trial). And its a
matter of record that she did not turn back the $217 million pork pie
of Federal taxpayer money for the bridge to no-whe Fact, She kept
it and distributed to her own set of pork projects. Facts that the
vetting team did not get to the speech writing team in time to cut
from the speech. :

@)))))) What a TV ad that is going to make.

Yeah - boring. I'm not talking about reality or truth, I'm talking
about what the very small relative number of voters who are gonna decide
thing are going to believe (and/or want to believe). And 217 mil of
pork that she didn't initiate and came out of Congress isn't gonna make
one iota of difference. Heck, McCain, Obama, and Biden are more
responsible for it than she is, and "THE FACT" (cue music) that she took
what fell into her lap and spent on her state isn't going to get too
many folks all a-tizzy. Yet another thing the Dems, with two Senators
on the ticket, need to be VERY careful about shouting from the rooftops.
IAC, the Dems put up some shtick about pork and bridges and Alaskan
Senators and house remodels and the GOP puts up pictures of her and her
family and Cindy McCain, and the heartland of the US, where corn and
farm subsidies pay for vacations, votes Sarah/Cindy '08...and oh, yeah,
for that old guy, whathisname, the war hero dude, too...

Remember Richard, its not
only Texans who have trouble with that veracity thingy.

Right. It's most all politicians and "liberals"...

Dave

HTH,
R