It's looking more and more like Palin and The Old Dude '08 and here's a reason...

On 22 Sep 2008 14:17:52 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

wrote in
:


If that's how you define it, I hope so. And where's your outrage at her
actual racism?


Why would I be outraged at anything Sandra Bernhardt says?

Um, who said anything about you? I was responding to Myron...

Is she running for something? Does she vote on anything?
Does she represent anyone? Is she holding proxies, maybe?

Don't know, don't care, and IAC, it doesn't matter.

HTH,
R

wrote:
http://media.newsbusters.org/stories...acks-manhattan

With "celebs" like these, Obama doesn't need enemies...

Sheesh,
R

facinating web site too...perhaps a bit right of the birchers though,
don't you think? jeezus, she's an outrageous, shock comedienne, who
says and does some wicked stuff. that you find it meaningful in any way
is kinda humorous. imo, she and you are simply jabbing at others'
sensibilities...you for political sport, her for show (and income).

jeff

wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:12:37 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote:



She's a comedian, with a propensity for shock humor. I wouldn't call
what she says 'racism' (or in this case, sexism or pro-semitism), I'd
just call it bad humor.


Hmmm...I'd call suggesting that "black men" would be interested in, much
less predisposed to, gang-raping someone pretty racist, but hey,
YMMV...IAC, what's that when compared to someone merely mentioning the
title of a record by a black man, right?

And there ya are,
R

i wasn't offended or bothered by your relatively lame attempt at irony
or satire (or whatever it was), anymore than i was at sandra b's brand
of outrageous humor. an apparent right-wing provocateur, poking at us
liberals and obama supporters by using a quotation containing the n-word
isn't necessarily or always racist. ...and richard pryor ... well, of
course, neither you nor sandra is richard pryor. but then, i'm not the
most sophisticated, intuitive, or informed audience for such attempts by
the not-richard-pryors either.

jeff

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:01:09 -0400, jeff miller
wrote:

wrote:
http://media.newsbusters.org/stories...acks-manhattan

With "celebs" like these, Obama doesn't need enemies...

Sheesh,
R

facinating web site too...perhaps a bit right of the birchers though,
don't you think? jeezus, she's an outrageous, shock comedienne, who
says and does some wicked stuff. that you find it meaningful in any way
is kinda humorous. imo, she and you are simply jabbing at others'
sensibilities...you for political sport, her for show (and income).

Oh, I doubt she would or could influence the election very much if at
all, but other more visible and "mainstream" celebs can and will. I
don't find her act itself particularly meaningful, I find it indicative.
And I'd offer that in many cases, the influence will be to drive more
potential voters away from the candidate the celeb's pitch seems
intended to support than folks it will convince to vote for them.

TC,
R

jeff

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:20:30 -0400, jeff miller
wrote:

wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:12:37 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote:



She's a comedian, with a propensity for shock humor. I wouldn't call
what she says 'racism' (or in this case, sexism or pro-semitism), I'd
just call it bad humor.


Hmmm...I'd call suggesting that "black men" would be interested in, much
less predisposed to, gang-raping someone pretty racist, but hey,
YMMV...IAC, what's that when compared to someone merely mentioning the
title of a record by a black man, right?

And there ya are,
R

i wasn't offended or bothered by your relatively lame attempt at irony
or satire (or whatever it was), anymore than i was at sandra b's brand
of outrageous humor. an apparent right-wing provocateur, poking at us
liberals and obama supporters by using a quotation containing the n-word
isn't necessarily or always racist. ...and richard pryor ... well, of
course, neither you nor sandra is richard pryor. but then, i'm not the
most sophisticated, intuitive, or informed audience for such attempts by
the not-richard-pryors either.

What makes you so sure I'm "right-wing?" And that's a hint...you're a
lawyer, and you should have learned about it first-year...

TC,
R

jeff

wrote in message
...
On 22 Sep 2008 14:17:52 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

wrote in
m:


If that's how you define it, I hope so. And where's your outrage at her
actual racism?


Why would I be outraged at anything Sandra Bernhardt says?

Um, who said anything about you? I was responding to Myron...

Is she running for something? Does she vote on anything?
Does she represent anyone? Is she holding proxies, maybe?

Don't know, don't care, and IAC, it doesn't matter.

Thus explaining in terms that even you and the rest of the pez-heads here
can understand, why you felt it was necessary to start this thread in the
first place, ainna?

Wolfgang

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:20:30 -0400, jeff miller
wrote:

wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:12:37 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote:



She's a comedian, with a propensity for shock humor. I wouldn't call
what she says 'racism' (or in this case, sexism or pro-semitism), I'd
just call it bad humor.


Hmmm...I'd call suggesting that "black men" would be interested in, much
less predisposed to, gang-raping someone pretty racist, but hey,
YMMV...IAC, what's that when compared to someone merely mentioning the
title of a record by a black man, right?

And there ya are,
R

i wasn't offended or bothered by your relatively lame attempt at irony
or satire (or whatever it was), anymore than i was at sandra b's brand
of outrageous humor. an apparent right-wing provocateur, poking at us
liberals and obama supporters by using a quotation containing the n-word
isn't necessarily or always racist. ...and richard pryor ... well, of
course, neither you nor sandra is richard pryor. but then, i'm not the
most sophisticated, intuitive, or informed audience for such attempts by
the not-richard-pryors either.

What makes you so sure I'm "right-wing?" And that's a hint...you're a
lawyer, and you should have learned about it first-year...

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wolfgang
el mysterioso rides again.......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:17:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 22, 6:56 am, wrote:

Richard
You know damn well that the National Republican party has a long and
well documented history of tolerating and using closeted sexual
deviants in electoral politics. Just look where Dick Morris has
migrated to. You know who Roy Cohen was, who the hit group known as
the "Rat ****ers" was, and you are certainly close enough to the
rotted core of the GOP to know which Republican parties a straight or
a straight laced person does not want to be invited to. And Im sure
you have heard the statement that "the "Ds" go for the booze and the
bimbos, the "Rs" go for the boy pages." I am pretty sure you also know
that the RNC operatives who are called in especially to give a rascist
or anti gay angle to tough elections in the South, have been of that
closeted persuasion.

One of the incredible victories of political info spin of the last 3
decades is the Republican party's ability to garner the "family
values" banner, while harboring the majority of the most notorious
congressional child molesters, philanderers and adulterers of our
times. Between the ex-trotskyites magically transformed into
"NeoConservatives," Roy Cohen's devil spawn, and just plain deviants,
normal middle of the road, non fanatical Republicans have been driven
out of the party. They have been replaced by massed fundamentalists
looking for a way to feed at the trough, ideological woodenheads stuck
in time, and folks who assume that the GOP is still the respectable
moderate option it once was. I would bet you are aware of this stuff
and more, yet you soldier on, maybe not really a true believer, but
loyal to the end. Amazing.

Um, what makes you think I'm a Republican (or for that matter, a
Democrat)?

OOOOOOH! MYSTERIOUS!

IAC, I do know some folks in both parties, in office, out of
office, and never ran for office, and I know of a whole lot more and
neither party is free of hypocrites, liars, philanders, adulterers,
alcoholics, drug users and abusers, racists, bigots, idiots, fools,
damned good people, caring individuals who really want to do what's
best, hard workers, ****heads, dip****s, and a whole further broad
spectrum. In case you hadn't figured it out, such large political
parties are made up of large numbers of actual people, and well, it's
pretty easy to imagine what happens when you go and get actual people
mixed up in things...

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wolfgang
who knows that if you're going to say the same thing over and over and over
and over and over for year after year after year after year........shorter
is sweeter.

On Sep 23, 7:04*pm, wrote:

what's that when compared to someone merely mentioning the
title of a record by a black man, right?

And there ya are,
R

Also vile, if you ask me. And if Sandra Bernhardt was a regular poster
here, and posted such tripe, I'd tell her so.

And I would expect her to drop the pretense of having not actually
done anything wrong. But she, at least, is a professional comedian and
being vile is her schtick.

You, on the other hand, can continue to insist that you had no
ulterior motive with your foolish post, and that you "merely posted
the name of an album', but you insult us with your childish insistence
that we must believe that. I deal with children all day, I don't need
to do it here, too.

--riverman

riverman wrote:

... I deal with children all day, I don't need
to do it here, too.

NAHAY?