OT- Landslide?

On Oct 12, 7:48*pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in news:vcOdnSCVw9
:

Regardless of any other considerations, a "landslide" might be a good
thing, giving the incumbent the necessary power to actually implement
reform.

More importantly, it gives a clear message to the Republican Party that it
needs to retool. *In the long run, two viable vital parties (or more) are
probably in everyone's best interest.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Heh heh, Calif Bill didn´t write that.

Parties only primarily serve their own interests, that is why many
things which are necessary and sensible never happen, it would be
contrary to party interests.

On Oct 12, 11:06*am, wrote:

Are you actually a citizen of some country where you actually vote?
What might that country be? Do you vote? Have you done any grass roots
political work or served in a party office? You seem very far removed
from any real appreciation for things political, much less how things
might work in a large, continental, federal country such as the US or
Canada or Australia. Separate and apart from your hatred for several
of us on ROFF, your comments on things political and economic read as
smugly childish.

Dave

On Oct 12, 10:49*pm, DaveS wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:06*am, wrote:

Are you actually a citizen of some country where you actually vote?
What might that country be? Do you vote? Have you done any grass roots
political work or served in a party office? You seem very far removed
from any real appreciation for things political, much less how things
might work in a large, continental, federal country such as the US or
Canada or Australia. Separate and apart from your hatred for several
of us on ROFF, your comments on things political and economic read as
smugly childish.

Dave

How you read things is your affair. There is no way I would give a
nasty **** like you any information at all, personal or otherwise.

Quite apart from which, somebody who rabbits on about monkey fellatio,
shagging diseased sheep, and a host of other weird and stupid ****e is
not to be taken seriously about anything.

DaveS wrote:
snip
Separate and apart from your hatred for several
of us on ROFF, your comments on things political and economic read as
smugly childish.

He's uneducated, a clever simpleton with pretensions.

Would you and Tom *please* quit poking at the friggin' loony
so maybe the damn thing will go away ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Oct 12, 11:55*pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:


He's uneducated, a clever simpleton with pretensions.

Would you and Tom *please* quit poking at the friggin' loony
so maybe the damn thing will go away ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

Heh heh, you wish Kenny boy. No idea what education you received, but
it did no good, because you turned out to be just a stupid nasty
****.

The more these other dumbos try to follow your lead, the more damage
they do themselves, and this group. Wouldn´t really make much
difference now even if they could think for themselves, or changed
their behaviour.

This place has had it as a fishing group. Eventually, only you nasty
****ers will be left. Indeed, it´s not far off that state now.

"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
"Calif Bill" wrote in news:vcOdnSCVw9
:

Regardless of any other considerations, a "landslide" might be a good
thing, giving the incumbent the necessary power to actually implement
reform.

More importantly, it gives a clear message to the Republican Party that it
needs to retool. In the long run, two viable vital parties (or more) are
probably in everyone's best interest.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

But we need good leadership in the next 4 years, or at least one that does
not screw us up really bad.

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
Would you and Tom *please* quit poking at the friggin' loony
so maybe the damn thing will go away ?

hell, I was just pleased that he wasn't posting pictures.
Tom

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:23:19 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:

hell, I was just pleased that he wasn't posting pictures.

SPLORKMUVANG and a yuck

Tom Littleton wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
Would you and Tom *please* quit poking at the friggin' loony
so maybe the damn thing will go away ?

hell, I was just pleased that he wasn't posting pictures.

Yeah, when he showed his ass he jumped the shark. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Oct 12, 8:29*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
wrote in message

...
*I would be very careful not to underestimate Palin (same thing
that I said about Bush before his first election): she is much, much
better out on the trail than she is being given credit for, and - I
suspect - she is getting better by the day, and could end up making a
significant difference in critical regions such as in Ohio and PA.

she got booed in Philly at a hockey game last night, and the GOP state
chairman fretted publicly as to how the ticket seems to have lost votes
among suburban women in Southeastern PA(normally GOP country, in past
years).
I agree with GC's sentiments, that barring a major Obama misstep, they
should be able to win this one, easily.
That said, I have watched Democrats snatch defeat from the jaws of victory
countless times.......g
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tom

I hope that you and George are right, but I suspect that where Obama's
part-black origins may come into play is that a lot of the electorate
will give him much less slack than other candidates, so the chance of
a misstep is higher since what could prove to be a "misstep" for him
might not be for others. Also, I watched a Palin speech last night,
one she gave in Johnstown a few days ago, and was impressed, not by
what she said but how she presented it. I have no idea whether and
how much of the speech was written by others, but she definitely made
it appear her own.