![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave LaCourse
wrote: Found out some details today. We get about a ton of food each month from MEFAP (Mass Emergency Food Availability Program), but that will soon be cutting back. The State is already in a billion dollar deficit with more to follow. We get 14 cases of ten various items (from a list of about 20). That is from the Lowell Food Bank which is a State run facility. We also get about another ton of food for which we pay $0.17/pound. Our money comes from two $5000 private grants, and about $20K from two churches, and some money from fund raisers (auction, sponsored foot race, etc.). The local supermarkets give us yesterday's pastries/breads, and old fruit and vegetables which we have to package. Our expenses are mortgage on the building, expenses for the 12 pass van, heat and electricity, etc. Only one person is paid - the Director and then she is only a part-time employee, and doesn't make very much for all she has to go through each week. Our cubbards are getting very bare because of the State's cutbacks and a slight increase in clients. this all sounds crazy to me. What's going on? Banks being nationalized, people who haven't made proper provision for the future being given handouts? Do you want a socialist (Obama?) for your next president or don't you? I think Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan would have been horrified by what's happening to private banks in the US at the moment. the market is the only thing that works. We all know that. At times, companies fail. That's part of the normal working of the market. Only commies want handouts to people who, let's face it, have made bad decisions about employment or about savings. If you get rid of moral risk (which requires that people who have made bad decisions should get hurt) then you destroy the very market which has made our great country wealthy. There are a lot of people out there who hate America, and want to destroy it. They are those who will cry fire in a crowded theatre, and will call for handouts when there's a blip in the market. The American way has made us rich: it requires that a few people who have made bad choices will suffer if the majority are going to flourish (and if those that flourish are going to be lean and fit). It also requires that we don't hand out taxpayers' money to people who have made bad choices. What's happening now is socialism. If I'd known that George W Bush was a commie, I wouldn't have voted for him last time round. Lazarus |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lazarus Cooke" wrote in message news:141020082339500453%lazaruscooke@britishlibrar y.invalid... There are a lot of people out there who hate America, and want to destroy it. They are those who will cry fire in a crowded theatre, and will call for handouts when there's a blip in the market. this group would, seemingly, include most elected officials, not to mention about half of Wall Street. Who the hell wouldn't want private profits and nationalized risk? The American way has made us rich: it requires that a few people who have made bad choices will suffer if the majority are going to flourish (and if those that flourish are going to be lean and fit). huh?? This sounds like a cross between Dr. Phil and Richard Simmons, with a dose or two of blotter acid thrown in. Tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Tom Littleton
wrote: Who the hell wouldn't want private profits and nationalized risk? So how far do you take it? Jack-booted Europeans trampling across the plains of Montana? In many places in Europe, any bum who's voluntarily chosen NOT to take out insurance can just roll up at a hospital, and get treated for tens of thousands of dollars-worth of treatment paid for by hard-working taxpayers. this is what clinton and obama are secretly trying to impose upon us. If poor people go without eating for a week they won't die. They may even be healthier after a hungry weekend, and start thinking about what jobs they're really prepared to do. Do people like Dave de la Course want us to pay for people wh own a television set? Why haven't they sold it? L |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:08:44 +0100, Lazarus Cooke
wrote: Do people like Dave de la Course want us to pay for people wh own a television set? Why haven't they sold it? Lazarus, I am the biggest capitalist you will ever find. I am not a bleeding heart liberal, and socialism is the worst of all the isms. BUT, some people fall through the cracks in the floor in our country. They receive assistance (it is some times my job to check what and how much assistance they get), but without the food given to them at the various food pantries in the area, they would be hungry. Is their cheating amongst them? Bet your bippy there is. But it is not my job to punish them for their cheating. I believe they will some day reap what they sow. But in the mean time, I have no qualms about helping someone who needs a hand-out, who needs help getting past a bad period in their life, who needs just a few groceries and a warm blanket to stave off the cold while they are homeless. You would do the same if you saw them. Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 12:24*am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
I have no qualms about helping someone who needs a hand-out, who needs help getting past a bad period in their life, who needs just a few groceries and a warm blanket to stave off the cold while they are homeless. *You would do the same if you saw them. Dave Sorry Dave but that's socialist talk. Are you a socialist or aren't you? Are you American or aren't you? L |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 2:31*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
That's not socialist talk. *That is caring for your fellow man. * And Americans have been caring about their fellow man a helluva lot in my 71 years on this earth. *We have given trillions of dollars to undeveloped nations (oooops, sorry, make that third world nations), our men and women have given their lives in foreign lands fighting for others. * Dave Sad that you apparently believe that. The illegal war you started contributed considerably to all your other problems. Even a significant percentage of the money and resources wasted on that war, and still being wasted as a result of it, would have solved many of your problems with regard to your fellow citizens who are in dire straits. Many are still not clear that it was all about oil, and had nothing to do with helping anybody at all. The stupidity and arrogance of your leaders, and their willingness and ability to manipulate you, along with your willingness to be manipulated, or the inability to even perceive it, is what caused your problems, and it will doubtless continue to do so. Your problems will increase as your population increases, and there is little doubt that your descendants will curse you. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lazarus Cooke" wrote in message news:151020080008445138%lazaruscooke@britishlibrar y.invalid... In article , Tom Littleton wrote: Who the hell wouldn't want private profits and nationalized risk? So how far do you take it? Jack-booted Europeans trampling across the plains of Montana? In many places in Europe, any bum who's voluntarily chosen NOT to take out insurance can just roll up at a hospital, and get treated for tens of thousands of dollars-worth of treatment paid for by hard-working taxpayers. this is what clinton and obama are secretly trying to impose upon us. If poor people go without eating for a week they won't die. They may even be healthier after a hungry weekend, and start thinking about what jobs they're really prepared to do. Do people like Dave de la Course want us to pay for people wh own a television set? Why haven't they sold it? L .....ok, Lazarus, I get the sarcasm now. I still stand by my description of that one paragraph, but now understand the style to be intentional. vbg Tom |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lazarus Cooke wrote:
this all sounds crazy to me. What's going on? Banks being nationalized, people who haven't made proper provision for the future being given handouts? Do you want a socialist (Obama?) for your next president or don't you? I think Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan would have been horrified by what's happening to private banks in the US at the moment. the market is the only thing that works. We all know that. At times, companies fail. That's part of the normal working of the market. Only commies want handouts to people who, let's face it, have made bad decisions about employment or about savings. If you get rid of moral risk (which requires that people who have made bad decisions should get hurt) then you destroy the very market which has made our great country wealthy. There are a lot of people out there who hate America, and want to destroy it. They are those who will cry fire in a crowded theatre, and will call for handouts when there's a blip in the market. The American way has made us rich: it requires that a few people who have made bad choices will suffer if the majority are going to flourish (and if those that flourish are going to be lean and fit). It also requires that we don't hand out taxpayers' money to people who have made bad choices. What's happening now is socialism. If I'd known that George W Bush was a commie, I wouldn't have voted for him last time round. LOL !! I couldn't bring myself to snip nary a word. A most beautiful piece of satire, sir. One of the funniest things I've read on roff in quite awhile. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ping Ken Fortenberry | Dave LaCourse | Fly Fishing | 8 | July 7th, 2007 11:10 AM |