Congradulations Mr. President!

On Nov 5, 12:12 am, daytripper wrote:

[little snip]

One can only wonder, had McCain taken the high road through this presidential
campaign, if the outcome could have been different. Perhaps not - clearly, the
electorate was disgusted with the Republican Party and may not have shown any
quarter.

Ironically, I think his whole approach to the campaign (including
choosing Palin) was an effort on his (or his handlers') part to try to
win back the rabid right element who never really supported him in the
first place. In pandering to them, he just alienated moderates even
more.

In any case, there is reason to be hopeful that McCain will provide a
positive contribution to the raising of the ship of state, before he rides off
into retirement.

And hopefully Palin goes back to doing whatever it is she was doing
before, never to be heard from again on the national scene.

And so now we wait and watch as the next Administration is formed - and hope
that the current, disgraced Administration goes away quietly...

My only concern is that the current administration has no reason to
care about what they leave behind for the new administration.


Chuck Vance

Conan The Librarian wrote:


My only concern is that the current administration has no reason to
care about what they leave behind for the new administration.



Are you suggesting that they might have the same kind of transition as
Clinton did with with the handover to Bush?

Peaceful Bill wrote:
Conan The Librarian wrote:



My only concern is that the current administration has no reason to
care about what they leave behind for the new administration.



Are you suggesting that they might have the same kind of transition as
Clinton did with with the handover to Bush?

Yeah, we're going to see the pardons come fast a furious.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message
...

Conan The Librarian wrote:
My only concern is that the current administration has no reason to
care about what they leave behind for the new administration.

Are you suggesting that they might have the same kind of transition as
Clinton did with with the handover to Bush?

Why is it that some right wingers' only response to anything is to whine,
"yeah but Klinton was just as bad"?


Chuck Vance

Conan The Librarian wrote:
"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message
...

Conan The Librarian wrote:
My only concern is that the current administration has no reason to
care about what they leave behind for the new administration.
Are you suggesting that they might have the same kind of transition as
Clinton did with with the handover to Bush?

Why is it that some right wingers' only response to anything is to whine,
"yeah but Klinton was just as bad"?


Chuck Vance



Why do left wingnuts give their p[oliticians a free pass while harshly
criticizing and blaming conservatives for everything that goes wrong (In
spite of who is actually at fault)?

"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message
...

Conan The Librarian wrote:
"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message
...

Are you suggesting that they might have the same kind of transition as
Clinton did with with the handover to Bush?

Why is it that some right wingers' only response to anything is to
whine, "yeah but Klinton was just as bad"?

Why do left wingnuts give their p[oliticians a free pass while harshly
criticizing and blaming conservatives for everything that goes wrong (In
spite of who is actually at fault)?

Non sequitur. You *were* whining. I wasn't blaming anyone for anything.

Re-read the thread and try again.

BTW, I don't recall seeing anything about flyfishing from you. Are you
just a troll?


Chuck Vance

Conan The Librarian wrote:
"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message
...

Conan The Librarian wrote:
"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message
...

Are you suggesting that they might have the same kind of transition as
Clinton did with with the handover to Bush?
Why is it that some right wingers' only response to anything is to
whine, "yeah but Klinton was just as bad"?
Why do left wingnuts give their p[oliticians a free pass while harshly
criticizing and blaming conservatives for everything that goes wrong (In
spite of who is actually at fault)?

Non sequitur. You *were* whining. I wasn't blaming anyone for anything.

Re-read the thread and try again.

BTW, I don't recall seeing anything about flyfishing from you. Are you
just a troll?


Chuck Vance

Chuck you. Maybe you have trouble finding fishing posts.

On Nov 5, 11:02*am, Peaceful Bill
wrote:

I would like to see some of the rightwing traitors and war profiters
put on trial and shot. :+8

Dave
HeeHaw

On Nov 5, 1:02 pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote:

Conan The Librarian wrote:

Non sequitur. You *were* whining. I wasn't blaming anyone for anything.

Re-read the thread and try again.

BTW, I don't recall seeing anything about flyfishing from you. Are you
just a troll?

Chuck you. Maybe you have trouble finding fishing posts.

That's the best you can do, eh? Predictably, no response to my
point about your whining and non sequitur.

BTW, a quick Google groups search shows you with a couple of
fishing related posts compared to a couple of dozen trolls on
political topics.

But I must admit, you've got quite the history of posting on NASCAR
related groups.


Chuck Vance (kind of ironic that your expertise seems to be
*left* turns, eh?)

On 2008-11-05, Conan The Librarian wrote:

And hopefully Palin goes back to doing whatever it is she was doing
before, never to be heard from again on the national scene.

What was that quote in Time mag? "Palin and Fey have one thing in common.
They're both better entertainers than politicians" ....or something to that
effect. Maybe she could get a job on SNL.

FrankTV already has a BO clone, but Frank is so unfunny as to be too painful
to endure.

nb