Hauling, Rod-loading.

On Nov 10, 5:07*pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 10, 4:13 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
rw wrote:
wrote:
This theory, and the related equations, are my original work, if you
use it, please credit where you got it from.
I suggest that you submit it for publication -- to The Journal of
Irreproducible Results.
http://www.jir.com/
LOL !

The Loony was better off when he was refusing to post anything
about fly fishing. He came off as just a loony crank but now
that he's decided to grace us with his gibberish he comes across
as a loony crank and a laughable crackpot. It reminds me of the
time Gehrke posted his scientific treatise on the chemistry of
floatants and everybody who'd ever taken a chemistry class beyond
high school laughed their asses off.

Heh heh, what´s up Kenny boy, too dumb to understand a simple
equation, and the matching theory?

No, too smart to waste time wading through your silly gibberish.
Articles on the subject have been written by real physicists and
published in real journals as opposed to your amateurish silliness
which has been "published" only in the deluded depths of your
arrogant imagination.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Shoild be easy for you to disprove it then Kenny boy, or find somebody
who can eh?

You are just another bull****ter.

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
wrote:
Heh heh, what´s up Kenny boy, too dumb to understand a simple
equation, and the matching theory?
No, too smart to waste time wading through your silly gibberish.
Articles on the subject have been written by real physicists and
published in real journals as opposed to your amateurish silliness
which has been "published" only in the deluded depths of your
arrogant imagination.

Shoild be easy for you to disprove it then Kenny boy, or find somebody
who can eh?

Yeah, it should be but why bother even reading the silly
rantings of an uneducated simpleton who wouldn't know a
differential equation from a train schedule ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Nov 10, 5:26*pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
wrote:
Heh heh, what´s up Kenny boy, too dumb to understand a simple
equation, and the matching theory?
No, too smart to waste time wading through your silly gibberish.
Articles on the subject have been written by real physicists and
published in real journals as opposed to your amateurish silliness
which has been "published" only in the deluded depths of your
arrogant imagination.

Shoild be easy for you to disprove it then Kenny boy, or find somebody
who can eh?

Yeah, it should be but why bother even reading the silly
rantings of an uneducated simpleton who wouldn't know a
differential equation from a train schedule ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

Well now Kenny boy, if you knew anything at all about it, you might be
able to actually see what it means and entails, but as you are merely
an ignorant gob****e, such information is indeed useless to you.

Also, if you didn´t or couldn´t read it, how could you possibly know
it is wrong? You are just a dumb bull****ter Kenny boy.