![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hope to obtain clarification on posting rules and after reading as
much as possible on the Rec.Outdoors.Fishing.Bass Newsgroup website found at http://www.rofb.net/index.htm, I am still unclear on the following: Is it possible to know whether an admonishment from someone is from an "elected official" as stated in the guidelines? I received a profanity laden set of emails from a member who certainly seemed to deviate from the idea that IF I did violate the charter the remedy would be "First and second offense - the poster will be notified of the specific infraction in e-mail and referred to these guidelines and the charter." Not until the fourth offense should anyone have reported a violation to my ISP...as stated: "Fourth and subsequent offense - the poster's second-tier Internet Presence Provider will be notified of the specific infraction and provided with copies of these guidelines and the charter.A copy of these correspondences will also be provided to the primary Internet Service Provider." I have NO desire to violate the rules or offend anyone. For others who wish to remain on the right side of the rules, I strongly encourage you to visit the link above which I repeat here for emphasis: http://www.rofb.net/index.htm I would sincerely appreciate a reasonable explanation as all I could get from this person who contacted me was to be called names...even to the point of insulting my children...followed by the claim that he'd reported my abuse to my ISP. Family-Outdoors |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basically any purely commercial spamming is prohibited. Obfuscating to hide
a primarily commercial intent is pretty transparent and you are just ask likely to get jumped on. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well I guess I'm going to wade in here.
No one has been given "any" authority to act on befalf of the members of this newgroup.As a "longtime" member of the R.O.F.B , I was one of the members which helped institute said posting " guidelines" they were always meant to be just that; giudelines. There has "never been nor will there "ever" be any "elected" officials of the rofb. The R.O.F.B. website was put together by members of this newsgroup, and as such , the site belongs to all members of the R.O.F.B. There has always been a cutodian of the website, and over the years this custodian has changed from time to time. As of now I belive that Bob LaLonde is the current custodian of the site. The custodian's job was to maintian the site ,and to occassionally provide a link to said site here on the newsgroup.These are the "only" resposibilities the site custodian has "ever" had. NO one has been elected as the r.o.f.b badass. And I regret that a member has elected to harrass any one on this newsgroup. It has been my experience on this newsgroup that out in out spammers usually go away if they are ignored. I apologize in advance if my rant steps on anyone's toes, but I sincerely believe that no offense was meant by the original poster. _____________________ David Norton Millennium Custom Rods "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... Basically any purely commercial spamming is prohibited. Obfuscating to hide a primarily commercial intent is pretty transparent and you are just ask likely to get jumped on. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
D. Norton wrote:
Well I guess I'm going to wade in here. snip I apologize in advance if my rant steps on anyone's toes, but I sincerely believe that no offense was meant by the original poster. Just to reiterate some of David's points, the Usenet newsgroup rec.outdoors.fishing.bass is an unmoderated newsgroup. Anybody anywhere can post whatever the hell they like to this Usenet newsgroup and there's very little anyone can do about it. Like all unmoderated Usenet newsgroups rofb is self-policing. Which means anybody named "self" can be the police. Your"self", my"self", anybody. Ultimately the newsgroup will reflect the intentions of the regular posters. Now I don't know who sent emails to family-outdoors, it wasn't me, but like David I believe no offense was intended. However, the posts of family-outdoors to this forum are what I would consider to be Usenet SPAM. And I never apologize for my rants. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"D. Norton" wrote in message
... Well I guess I'm going to wade in here. No one has been given "any" authority to act on befalf of the members of this newgroup.As a "longtime" member of the R.O.F.B , I was one of the members which helped institute said posting " guidelines" they were always meant to be just that; giudelines. There has "never been nor will there "ever" be any "elected" officials of the rofb. The R.O.F.B. website was put together by members of this newsgroup, and as such , the site belongs to all members of the R.O.F.B. There has always been a cutodian of the website, and over the years this custodian has changed from time to time. As of now I belive that Bob LaLonde is the current custodian of the site. Good point. I have not done that in a while. Sorry. Falling down on the job I guess. The custodian's job was to maintian the site ,and to occassionally provide a link to said site here on the newsgroup.These are the "only" resposibilities the site custodian has "ever" had. NO one has been elected as the r.o.f.b badass. And I regret that a member has elected to harrass any one on this newsgroup. It has been my experience on this newsgroup that out in out spammers usually go away if they are ignored. I apologize in advance if my rant steps on anyone's toes, but I sincerely believe that no offense was meant by the original poster. _____________________ David Norton Millennium Custom Rods "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... Basically any purely commercial spamming is prohibited. Obfuscating to hide a primarily commercial intent is pretty transparent and you are just ask likely to get jumped on. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fly tying rules: in or out? | Da | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | February 5th, 2007 03:02 AM |
Fly tying rules: in or out? | Da | Fly Fishing | 1 | February 4th, 2007 04:00 PM |
Fly tying rules: in or out? | Da | General Discussion | 0 | February 4th, 2007 02:40 PM |
Italy rules! | Vittorix | General Discussion | 0 | October 19th, 2006 07:10 PM |
You know the rules. | BassDude | Bass Fishing | 2 | December 30th, 2004 09:06 PM |