OT Lucifer's Testicles

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:14:31 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/eastereggs.html

Presented without comment to my right-wing nitwit
fly fishing colleagues.

And presented to all the normal folk with a great
big SPLORK VANG MU. ;-)

Happy Easter.

Hmmm...you posting a link to a site pimping anti-Obama merchandise...?

Sure. I also write op-ed pieces for The Onion. ;-)

And would you write about how the Jews are the "dirtiest little critter(s) on
earth," and are cockroaches and maggots...? I seem to recall you railing
against anything anti-Semitic as racist and foul...

HTH,
R

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Sure. I also write op-ed pieces for The Onion. ;-)

And would you write about how the Jews ...

See Dan's post earlier in this thread.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:13:04 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Sure. I also write op-ed pieces for The Onion. ;-)

And would you write about how the Jews ...

See Dan's post earlier in this thread.

The only post by Dan I see is one explaining to Daffy about how it's not a real
church, so if you're referring to the fact that it's not a "real" church, I
already knew that - it has nothing to do with real or not, satire or otherwise.
What I'm asking is why are you tacitly supporting via applause and approval a
site which is, by your own definitions, racist?

HTH,
R
....or perhaps you didn't really look around at the site before you passed it
along...?

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
See Dan's post earlier in this thread.

The only post by Dan I see is one explaining to Daffy about how it's not a real
church, so if you're referring to the fact that it's not a "real" church, I
already knew that - it has nothing to do with real or not, satire or otherwise.
What I'm asking is why are you tacitly supporting via applause and approval a
site which is, by your own definitions, racist?

Apparently you don't understand my "definitions".

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:35:56 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
See Dan's post earlier in this thread.

The only post by Dan I see is one explaining to Daffy about how it's not a real
church, so if you're referring to the fact that it's not a "real" church, I
already knew that - it has nothing to do with real or not, satire or otherwise.
What I'm asking is why are you tacitly supporting via applause and approval a
site which is, by your own definitions, racist?

Apparently you don't understand my "definitions".

Apparently, you don't either...

HTH,
R