![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:13:04 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: Sure. I also write op-ed pieces for The Onion. ;-) And would you write about how the Jews ... See Dan's post earlier in this thread. The only post by Dan I see is one explaining to Daffy about how it's not a real church, so if you're referring to the fact that it's not a "real" church, I already knew that - it has nothing to do with real or not, satire or otherwise. What I'm asking is why are you tacitly supporting via applause and approval a site which is, by your own definitions, racist? HTH, R ....or perhaps you didn't really look around at the site before you passed it along...? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:35:56 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: See Dan's post earlier in this thread. The only post by Dan I see is one explaining to Daffy about how it's not a real church, so if you're referring to the fact that it's not a "real" church, I already knew that - it has nothing to do with real or not, satire or otherwise. What I'm asking is why are you tacitly supporting via applause and approval a site which is, by your own definitions, racist? Apparently you don't understand my "definitions". Apparently, you don't either... HTH, R |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|