Lake Ontario

Wolfgang wrote:



Not surprising. After all, ROFF is what it is.

Wolfgang
who really wouldn't want it to be anything else.


For me, it's a part of ROFF I can do without. I don't see the humor,
satisfaction or pleasure in toying around with some clueless, easy
target that puts his foot in his mouth with every sentence. (I know I
need to get a sense of humor, but I think I'll pass on that type of humor).

Willi

"Willi" wrote in message
...


Wolfgang wrote:



Not surprising. After all, ROFF is what it is.

Wolfgang
who really wouldn't want it to be anything else.


For me, it's a part of ROFF I can do without. I don't see the humor,
satisfaction or pleasure in toying around with some clueless, easy
target that puts his foot in his mouth with every sentence.

Well, try toying with someone who is NOT a clueless easy target some time,
and I think you will see that the other is indeed more humorous and
satisfying.

(I know I
need to get a sense of humor, but I think I'll pass on that type of
humor).

You may pass on whatever you wish, but I suggest that a search of the
archives will reveal that you have not always been quite so picky.

Wolfgang
sanctimony sucks.

Wolfgang wrote:


Not surprising. After all, ROFF is what it is.

Wolfgang
who really wouldn't want it to be anything else.


For me, it's a part of ROFF I can do without. I don't see the humor,
satisfaction or pleasure in toying around with some clueless, easy
target that puts his foot in his mouth with every sentence.


Well, try toying with someone who is NOT a clueless easy target some time,
and I think you will see that the other is indeed more humorous and
satisfying.


(I know I
need to get a sense of humor, but I think I'll pass on that type of

humor).

You may pass on whatever you wish, but I suggest that a search of the
archives will reveal that you have not always been quite so picky.

Wolfgang
sanctimony sucks.



(But pomposity rules?)


Nah, I'm just a "sinner", so you're probably right.

But I don't think I've ever reveled in "gang banging" a clueless newby,
but I could be wrong.

Willi

"Willi" wrote in message
...


Wolfgang wrote:

sanctimony sucks.



(But pomposity rules?)

Nah, that's just a hobby.

Nah, I'm just a "sinner", so you're probably right.

But I don't think I've ever reveled in "gang banging" a clueless
newby,
but I could be wrong.

Well, yeah, you could be. On the other hand, I don't recall that any
newby here has been gang banged simply for being clueless. Oh, there
have certainly been a number of cases in which one psychopath or
another has gone off on a newby for no apparent reason, but in cases
where a diverse group of individuals who have demonstrated an absolute
incapacity to agree on anything else have concurrently fired upon a
newby the, cluelessness has invariably been merely one more factor
exacerbating some other egregious offense. Besides, while I can't
speak for others, I have personally never reveled in it......I
consider it a solemn duty.

Wolfgang
not that there's anything wrong with deriving a bit of amusement from
the performance of a solemn duty.