northern colorado fly fishin' get togather......

In actuallity, its the FFF National Convention. Was scheduled to go,
maybe next year.
Frank Reid

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Frank Reid
wrote:

In actuallity, its the FFF National Convention. Was scheduled to go,
maybe next year.
Frank Reid

Ah...el beano's links are not something I click.

TC,
R

On Jul 31, 10:04*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Frank Reid
wrote:

In actuallity, its the FFF National Convention. * Was scheduled to go,
maybe next year.
Frank Reid

Ah...el beano's links are not something I click.

TC,
R

Maybe he clicks these. Check out this Huffington Post article...
http://tinyurl.com/beanieboy

--riverman

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:58:13 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote:

On Jul 31, 10:04*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Frank Reid
wrote:

In actuallity, its the FFF National Convention. * Was scheduled to go,
maybe next year.
Frank Reid

Ah...el beano's links are not something I click.

TC,
R

Maybe he clicks these. Check out this Huffington Post article...
http://tinyurl.com/beanieboy

--riverman

This is the dumbest argument (well, the dumbest widely-disseminated one,
anyhoo...) against Obama - he could have been born on ****in' Mars and he'd
still be a "natural born Citizen" as contemplated by the US Constitution.
Granted, if, in the extremely unlikely event it turns out he was born in Kenya
(or wherever) and engaged in a conspiracy to hide that, it is an issue. But
even if he was born wherever, he was a US citizen at birth, and therefore, a
"natural born" US citizen as contemplated by Article 2. Article 2 has nothing
to do with location of birth, only status at birth. If it were location-based,
the child of a foreign diplomat or leader that just happened to be born on a
trip to the US by their mother would be eligible even though they were
_specifically_ not a citizen at birth, but a child of two US citizens, one or
both of whom were US diplomats, and who happened to be born on foreign soil
would not be, even though they are _specifically_ citizens at birth.

An interesting sidenote to all of this, that I've not seen covered by anyone, is
that the primary way - indeed, about the only way - for him not to have been
born a US citizen would have been for his mother to have repudiated her
citizenship prior to his birth (and I've heard no accusations of this from even
the beanie-class loons). However, the birth notices in the Hawaii papers tend
to indicate that, even if his parents falsely inserted them to make it appear he
was born in Hawaii for citizenship purposes (unnecessary, insofar as his
eligibility for POTUS), it would be evidence that she had not repudiated, and
had no intentions of repudiating, her US citizenship.

comerad hussein has spent big $$ sending legal teams
across america to keep all docs hidden from the public....now,
i wonder why? we will soon see.......this clown won't
last long...he, he, he .....


dems screw up yet again.......










On Aug 1, 8:10*am, wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:58:13 -0700 (PDT), riverman wrote:
On Jul 31, 10:04*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Frank Reid
wrote:

In actuallity, its the FFF National Convention. * Was scheduled to go,
maybe next year.
Frank Reid

Ah...el beano's links are not something I click.

TC,
R

Maybe he clicks these. Check out this Huffington Post article...
http://tinyurl.com/beanieboy

--riverman

This is the dumbest argument (well, the dumbest widely-disseminated one,
anyhoo...) against Obama - he could have been born on ****in' Mars and he'd
still be a "natural born Citizen" as contemplated by the US Constitution.
Granted, if, in the extremely unlikely event it turns out he was born in Kenya
(or wherever) and engaged in a conspiracy to hide that, it is an issue. *But
even if he was born wherever, he was a US citizen at birth, and therefore, a
"natural born" US citizen as contemplated by Article 2. *Article 2 has nothing
to do with location of birth, only status at birth. *If it were location-based,
the child of a foreign diplomat or leader that just happened to be born on a
trip to the US by their mother would be eligible even though they were
_specifically_ not a citizen at birth, but a child of two US citizens, one or
both of whom were US diplomats, and who happened to be born on foreign soil
would not be, even though they are _specifically_ citizens at birth.

An interesting sidenote to all of this, that I've not seen covered by anyone, is
that the primary way - indeed, about the only way - for him not to have been
born a US citizen would have been for his mother to have repudiated her
citizenship prior to his birth (and I've heard no accusations of this from even
the beanie-class loons). *However, the birth notices in the Hawaii papers tend
to indicate that, even if his parents falsely inserted them to make it appear he
was born in Hawaii for citizenship purposes (unnecessary, insofar as his
eligibility for POTUS), it would be evidence that she had not repudiated, and
had no intentions of repudiating, her US citizenship.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Jul 31, 9:04*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Frank Reid
wrote:

In actuallity, its the FFF National Convention. * Was scheduled to go,
maybe next year.
Frank Reid

Ah...el beano's links are not something I click.

Thus explaining the irresistible compulsion to reply.

Racist pig.

Idiot.

g.