Really, guys, I'm trying to get on-board with Obama, but...

Tom Littleton wrote:
oh, and Forty........taking the word of 'practically every' economic
'expert' has cost some folks a lot of money over the past few years. Ask
Louie.

In matters of economics who am I to believe, Tommy from
Pennsylvania or Paul Krugman, Nobel prize winning economist ?

Hmmmmmm ... boy, that's a tough one ... ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:00:28 -0600, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Tom Littleton wrote:
oh, and Forty........taking the word of 'practically every' economic
'expert' has cost some folks a lot of money over the past few years. Ask
Louie.

In matters of economics who am I to believe, Tommy from
Pennsylvania or Paul Krugman, Nobel prize winning economist ?

Alan Greenspan...?

Hmmmmmm ... boy, that's a tough one ... ;-)

....and is that the same "Paul Krugman" dude that wrote this:

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...0257/index.htm

(and where, on the "job" inspiring the above, apparently, much like Timmy, he
isn't quite sure how much he made...)

or this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss

or this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/ma...gewanted=print

HTH,
R

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Tom Littleton wrote:
oh, and Forty........taking the word of 'practically every' economic
'expert' has cost some folks a lot of money over the past few years. Ask
Louie.
In matters of economics who am I to believe, Tommy from
Pennsylvania or Paul Krugman, Nobel prize winning economist ?
Hmmmmmm ... boy, that's a tough one ... ;-)

...and is that the same "Paul Krugman" dude that wrote this:
...
or this:
...
or this:
...

Did you Google those up all by yourself ? That is really
impressive. Good for you, I'm proud of you.

Your next lesson takes the process a step further and
involves trying to read for comprehension the articles
you Google up.

Good luck.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:24:38 -0600, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Tom Littleton wrote:
oh, and Forty........taking the word of 'practically every' economic
'expert' has cost some folks a lot of money over the past few years. Ask
Louie.
In matters of economics who am I to believe, Tommy from
Pennsylvania or Paul Krugman, Nobel prize winning economist ?
Hmmmmmm ... boy, that's a tough one ... ;-)

...and is that the same "Paul Krugman" dude that wrote this:
...
or this:
...
or this:
...

Did you Google those up all by yourself ? That is really
impressive. Good for you, I'm proud of you.

Your next lesson takes the process a step further and
involves trying to read for comprehension the articles
you Google up.

Maybe yes, maybe no, but you sidestepped the question, as always...and again
done so about as elegantly and gracefully as Frank and Louie performing "Swan
Lake"...with Frank on his tractor, juggling housecats, and Louie on a bicycle in
his waders, swacked on Thunderdogs...

So...

....is that the same "Paul Krugman" dude that wrote this:

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...0257/index.htm

(and where, on the "job" inspiring the above, apparently, much like Timmy, he
isn't quite sure how much he made...)

or this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss

or this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/ma...gewanted=print

HTH,
R
....and your, er, en pointes are even less well-executed than those likely in the
aforementioned "production"...

Good luck.

Obama's recent visit to Dover Air Force Base to observe the
return of 18 service members' remains a "photo op"

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
Obama's recent visit to Dover Air Force Base to observe the
return of 18 service members' remains a "photo op"


No more so than the Gettysburg Address, except that the cameras are much
better.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Did you Google those up all by yourself ? That is really
impressive. Good for you, I'm proud of you.

Your next lesson takes the process a step further and
involves trying to read for comprehension the articles
you Google up.

Maybe yes, maybe no, but you sidestepped the question, as always...

Yeah, the question was stupid. Talk about a circus act, if you have
a point why don't you just come out and make it instead of playing
all cutesy and stupid with the buffoonish questions.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:53:06 -0600, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Did you Google those up all by yourself ? That is really
impressive. Good for you, I'm proud of you.

Your next lesson takes the process a step further and
involves trying to read for comprehension the articles
you Google up.

Maybe yes, maybe no, but you sidestepped the question, as always...

Yeah, the question was stupid. Talk about a circus act, if you have
a point why don't you just come out and make it instead of playing
all cutesy and stupid with the buffoonish questions.

....you do Fosse, Fosse, Fosse! You do Martha Graham, Martha Graham, Martha
Graham!...

So...

....is that the same "Paul Krugman" dude that wrote this:

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...0257/index.htm

(and where, on the "job" inspiring the above, apparently, much like Timmy, he
isn't quite sure how much he made...)

or this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/op...er=rss&emc=rss

or this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/ma...gewanted=print

HTH,
R

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Did you Google those up all by yourself ? That is really
impressive. Good for you, I'm proud of you.

Your next lesson takes the process a step further and
involves trying to read for comprehension the articles
you Google up.
Maybe yes, maybe no, but you sidestepped the question, as always...
Yeah, the question was stupid. Talk about a circus act, if you have
a point why don't you just come out and make it instead of playing
all cutesy and stupid with the buffoonish questions.

...you do Fosse, Fosse, Fosse! You do Martha Graham, Martha Graham, Martha
Graham!...

More cutesy, stupid buffoonery ? Given that I wouldn't dignify such
crap with the response you wanted the first time you posted it,
what on earth makes you think I'll do so if you keep repeating it ?

It appears that you believe you have proof positive that Paul
Krugman's opinion is not to be trusted. So, why would you think so ?
Lay off the smirking jackass shtick and make your point, if you
have one, like an adult.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Nov 3, 7:42*am, wrote:



Maybe yes, maybe no, but you sidestepped the question, as always...

Now THAT is funny!

HTH,
R

Idiot.

g.