![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24, 1:50*pm, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) Nice troll.....not gonna bite. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sandy" wrote in message . .. I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) What he said. And Sandy, I'm still waiting for a mailing address from you or should I just send the flyz to your web address :~^ ) once I tie them, of course. Op |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Merry Christmas, Sandy. And a very prosperous New Year to you and yours.
Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the modern conservative movement: “A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling "Stop!"” Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he also said (or wrote): “The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible, so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.” |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24, 4:00*pm, " wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote: I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the modern conservative movement: “A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling "Stop!"” Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he also said (or wrote): “The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible, so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.” Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to rebellious dilatants. cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "MajorOz" wrote in message ... On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote: On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote: I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the modern conservative movement: “A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling "Stop!"” Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he also said (or wrote): “The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible, so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.” Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to rebellious dilatants. cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?! Jeez, he hates college sportz and the greatest musical talent to ever grace this godforsaken planet! Op --a non-Christian with at least an inkling of the joy and spirit of the season-- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "MajorOz" wrote in message ... On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote: On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote: I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the modern conservative movement: “A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling "Stop!"” Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he also said (or wrote): “The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible, so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.” Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to rebellious dilatants. cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?! Jeez, he hates college sportz and the greatest musical talent to ever grace this godforsaken planet! Op --a non-Christian with at least an inkling of the joy and spirit of the season-- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) Yep, and some of these congressmen have been in on the stealing, fraud and overbilling of medicare. For Example, former Senator Bill Frist, whose conflicts of interest, financial disclosure, insider trading and campaign finance problems caused the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to name Frist as one of the most "corrupt" members of Congress. The Frist family fortunes come from the Hospital Corp of America, which Wiki says "was the subject of a decade-long Federal investigation into double-bookkeeping and suspected criminal fraud involving the bilking of Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare (the federal program that provides health insurance to members of the military and their families)." So much for his claims to be a patriot. HCA companies had to repay more than, $1,700,000,000 yep thats more than ONE point seven BILLION dollars, in fines the largest ever in US history. And afterwords guess what? the Bushees let HCA stay in the medicare program!! I challenge anyone to deny that this occurred. See, for normal Americans OVERBILLING is what the white collar thieves call it; to the rest of us it's just plain stealing. Come on whackjobs, explain it away. These howling sons of bitches had 12 years to do something about healthcare reform. They did diddly squat, zip, Nadya. Now, after being coaxed, offered a role, treated as colleagues, the only thing they have to offer is to spend MILLIONs to scare elders, lying that Obama's efforts to crack down on FRAUD by fly-by-night companies and GOP donors, are cuts in service. The corrupt ideologues and Snake handler preachers who have captured the GOP do not deserve the support of real conservatives and Republican moderates. They stole your party and you owe them nothing. Soon they will ask you to vote for some of the worst bigots and theocrats to run for public office since reconstruction. Fight back. Take your party back. Preserve the American two party system, the bulwark our forefathers built against radicalism. Wise up. Don't be a chump for the corporations and Wall Street. Dave America First |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "MajorOz" wrote in message ... On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote: On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote: I haven't participated here much--last year or so. There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the modern conservative movement: “A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling "Stop!"” Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he also said (or wrote): “The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible, so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.” Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to rebellious dilatants. cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?! If this ain't talent, the GOP will, enthusiastically, support all future Dem initiatives. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5aSs...eature=related Jeez, he hates college sportz and the greatest musical talent to ever grace this godforsaken planet! Op --a non-Christian with at least an inkling of the joy and spirit of the season-- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|