![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-03-18 12:55:00 -0400, Larry L said:
My question ... what is the best ( defined as least prone to tangle ) way to rig a couple nymphs and maybe a split shot ... i.e. droppers, all in a line hook bend to hook .... other? WHERE DO YOU put the heaviest fly so that tangles are minimized ? ... last one, first one ...other ? Larry, when I first learned to ff in the 40s, dries, wets, and streamers were the only kind of flies my parents and I used. However, when I came back to ff, nymphs were the hot thing. So, I learned how to nymph. I still prefer dries (with or without a hatch). I have tried all the "gimmicks" over the years, including multiple nymphs, the Czeck method, and other nefarious add-ons. I enjoyed watching a fellow roffian who shall remain un-named fish with a 3 fly rig which he untangled after each cast. Rule number 1: Keep your fly in the water. You can't do that if you are constantly untangling your rig. If you must use more than one, stick to two, and tie your rig as follows: 12 - 14 inches of tippet with a split shot at (above) the tippet/leader knot. At the end of the tippet tie on a nymph you think may do well. To the bend of that fly, tie another piece of tippet of about 14 - 16 inches. I use a simple clinch knot to do this. On the end of that tie in your second fly. This method will not tangle if you are careful and use what I call a circle cast. When your rig gets downstream from you and you have lowered your rod, swing the rig up-stream in one motion - no false casts. There are a couple of dangers using more than one fly. If you hook a fish on either fly, always remember **there is another fly on there** and its hook is very shap and will puncture rough old pirate's fingers. This extra fly or flies can also cause problems with your net, tangling it it and causing you more work. Rule number 2: Keep you fly in the water. Ya ain't catchin' much with it snagged in your net. Another "method" is the keep the tag end of your tippet knot at least eight inches long, and tie a second fly on the end. This medod works well, but it too can get tangled during casting or landing a fish. If I was to teach anyone nymphing, I would use but one fly at the end of a 14 inch tippet, with a split shot at the tippet knot. The most important thing you can learn about nymphing is how to achieve a dead drift. That is where the split shot comes in. If you notice that your leader/line connection (or strike indicator) is moving faster or at the same speed as the current, you need more weight. Add weight until your "indicator", be it the leader/line connection or a strike indicator, are freely floating *slower than the surface currect*. This is true if you are high-sticking it or casting up and across. I have many big fish with the up and across after a 50 foot cast, so do not limit your nymphing to high-sticking the water right in front of you. Finally: Mend, mend, mend, mend. And remember no tangles allows you to keep Rules #1 and 2 sacred. Went out this morning and caught a few little ones on a size 20 pt soft hackle. Water is warming up nicely and expect some hatches before too long. Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 2:59*pm, David LaCourse wrote:
And remember no tangles allows you to keep Rules #1 and 2 sacred. Went out this morning and caught a few little ones on a size 20 pt soft hackle. *Water is warming up nicely and expect some hatches before too long. Dave Thanks, Dave. I like 'sight nymphing' a lot ... casting to a fish I can see, the wink under water stuff and all. And I've done well with a single nymph and indicator rig, when I've actually given it a fair chance. Lastly, I really enjoy swinging a soft hackle at times, relaxing ya know, and catches fish to boot. I don't know why I got the multiple fly thing stuck in my head. Well, no, I do know. This river ( I've seined it on several occasions ) doesn't offer any clear choice of what should work. None, for some reason, inspires faith in me. Confidence is a big part of fishing, both in success and in enjoyment. I have a hard time feeling confident blind nymphing ( even when I'm doing well ! ) Really, that sums up my feeling about fishing the water in general ... If I can see him, I EXPECT to catch him .... if I can't see him I always feel as though I lucked into a fish when I do catch one.( exception: well populated small streams with a fish behind nearly every rock, and in every seam, where "knowing where he has to be" inspires faith ) I've had days on this local water where I've hooked fish on nymphs every few casts, others where I never got a bump .. same water, same flies .... I enjoy feeling more in control than that makes me feel. Think I'll stick to wade fishing and a single fly ... maybe an Egg Eating San Juan Worm g Thanks for the suggestions |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty much the only double rig I use anymore is: larger fly direct to
main tippet, smaller fly on a piece of smaller tippet tied in onto the eye of the larger fly. I've tried on the bend, tag end of tippet, et al., but tying into the eye is for me the easiest and least prone to tangle, and I think is better for hookups on the big fly. YMMV. BTW, the larger fly might not be big, on the San Juan I've used #20 and #22 rigs, and maybe even smaller. You can fit two 6x tippets into a #20 eye. And catch fish on it. Jon. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 4:43*pm, Jonathan Cook wrote:
Pretty much the only double rig I use anymore is: larger fly direct to main tippet, smaller fly on a piece of smaller tippet tied in onto the eye of the larger fly. Jon. That is one approach that never even occurred to me Thanks, I'll try it ( and some of the others suggested, as well ) Here's another 'confidence' weirdness in my head ... the one time I went to the San Juan I had zero problem 'trusting' tiny nymphs ( single rig ), but for some reason on this local water I don't, even though a seine suggests using them. Me B Odd ( even to me ) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 2:59*pm, David LaCourse wrote:
Larry, when I first learned to ff in the 40s, dries, wets, and streamers were the only kind of flies my parents and I used. *However, Way back when, when medium sized Sierra freestone streams were what I fished most, I gradually moved from mostly fishing attractor dries to mostly fishing a #14 primrose and partridge ( light phase ) soft hackle on a heavy hook. It, imho, did a good job of suggesting several clinger and crawler drowned duns as well as small stones common on these waters. Fish that wouldn't rise would eat it without hesitation. I fished it upstream, no indicator, sometimes you could see it, often not. Many, many times I've set the hook certain a fish would be there but totally unable to say that I 'saw' anything to make me do so. It was a magical feeling ... one that makes me think I'd really like indicator-less nymphing, if I did it enough to develop confidence and that sixth sense. But, life is short ( ain't it ) and I don't drive a thousand miles to some great dry fly waters, to practice nymphing G So I'll probably never really grow to like nymphing, although I can sense it could have great appeal beyond just effectiveness. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cast net throwing | STEPHEN PEEK | Saltwater Fishing | 12 | June 25th, 2011 12:17 AM |
OT Throwing Dummies | Ken Fortenberry[_2_] | Fly Fishing | 12 | February 11th, 2009 04:11 PM |
Throwing up help! | Shaun Bell | Saltwater Fishing | 18 | July 14th, 2006 02:14 PM |
How much / what weight backing, for a wide-use 8 weight? | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 28 | December 6th, 2005 03:36 AM |
Throwing Stick | Jake | UK Coarse Fishing | 4 | February 13th, 2005 09:20 PM |