Bend Over, USA

"Tim J." wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote...


Wolfgang
whose political philosophy has been clearly and unequivocally
stated
on a number of occasions.

Honestly, I (who is not assuming to place himself on the "list of
careful
readers") haven't figured out much about your political bent at all.
I've come
to the conclusion that there's left, right, and Wolfgang. Good job!
I admire the
political enigma.

It was never my intention to be enigmatic......well, not about this
anyway. Quite simply, I'm an anarchist. However, as a long time
observer of political processes (and some time participant), I came to
the realization decades ago that very few people are interested in
trying anarchy and, as anarchy obviously requires near universal
acceptance, it ain't gonna happen. So, I live with the political
system we have in place, reserving the right to comment periodically
on the antics of the greedy and murderous assholes who run it, and the
even greedier and more murderous vapid assholes who lend their support
to one insufferable faction or another, all the while trying
desperately to justify their rapaciousness and boundless misanthropy.

Simple, no?

Wolfgang
who is all atwitter with anticipation over which fool of a liar will
step up to the plate first.

"Wolfgang" wrote...
snip
Wolfgang
who is all atwitter with anticipation over which fool of a liar will
step up to the plate first.

I read that challenge as:
"You're so vain, I bet you think this song is about you. Don't you?"


--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

"Tim J." wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote...
snip
Wolfgang
who is all atwitter with anticipation over which fool of a liar
will
step up to the plate first.

I read that challenge as:
"You're so vain, I bet you think this song is about you. Don't you?"

Well, I guess that making them a matter of public record is still the
best way to assure that one's hopes and expectations are dashed. Ask
for a reasoned response and you'll get a fool every time. Conversely,
ask for a fool and you get.......THIS!

Wolfgang

Quite simply, I'm an anarchist. anip
Simple, no?
Wolfgang

You chose, or someone chose for you, one of the better nations in which to
practice your particular form of anarchy.

It would appear to me that choosing such a political philosophy would
require a bit less anarchy on your part if there were more anarchists around
to practice said philosophy with you.


--
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
TANSTAAFL

"slenon" wrote in message
.. .
Quite simply, I'm an anarchist. anip
Simple, no?
Wolfgang

You chose, or someone chose for you, one of the better nations in which to
practice your particular form of anarchy.

I'll try to keep that in mind if I ever practice anarchy. I wouldn't hold
my breath though; cooperative ventures, by their very nature, are not the
sorts of things one can do alone......and I don't see a line forming
anywhere. As to a "particular form of anarchy", I'm sure I don't have a
much better idea of what you might mean by that than you have.

It would appear to me that choosing such a political philosophy would
require a bit less anarchy on your part if there were more anarchists
around
to practice said philosophy with you.

Um.......you DO know that words have meanings, right? I mean, I don't want
to appear to be unduly demanding or anything.....I don't, for example,
expect you to know what meanings go with which words....but you ARE aware
that there is some sort of correlation, right?

Wolfgang

Wolfgang:
As to a "particular form of anarchy", I'm sure I don't have a
much better idea of what you might mean by that than you have.

Are you a pure anarchist, a rational anarchist, anarchist when convenient?
Consult your dictionaries or old poly sci textbooks. Or, are you a good
witch or a bad witch? Answer either question and get bonus points.

Um.......you DO know that words have meanings, right? I mean, I don't want
to appear to be unduly demanding or anything.....I don't, for example,
expect you to know what meanings go with which words....but you ARE aware
that there is some sort of correlation, right?

That is my understanding. You, however, seem confused by the concept that
organized anarchy is in effect, not anarchy at all.

I've always been amused at the concept that anarchy can be a system of
government to any degree of reality. Equally, I've been amused at student
revolutionaries, who've never held a firearm or a Molotov cocktail, seen
trauma beyond the random parking lot scuffle, or worked for their consumer
goods, demanding and desiring the type of social and economic restructuring
that would guarantee that they would never again set foot on campus or use
their parent provided consumer goods. Once in a while, I find myself
wishing them a small dose of what they demonstrate for. But my better
nature and my own desire for creature comforts prevails.

Your statement, to me, seems to indicate that rather than participate
actively in any political system, you simply justify opting out and sniping
from the sidelines by claiming to be an anarchist. It is an easy copout.

Of course, given the nature of usenet communications, you could be quite an
active participant in local and other politics and simply be driven to
making such statements to the contrary by boredom, SAD, or some other
causation. So, as winter locks you into its grip and sunlight hours
decrease, may you find some degree of comfort in your dictionaries, manuals
of grammar and syntax, and your insistence in using multiple periods to no
real end but to fill space on a monitor and perhaps exercise your right ring
finger. ..............Or do you, .......perhaps.......just ....have a
sticky..........keyboard?

--
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69

"slenon" wrote in message
...
Wolfgang:
As to a "particular form of anarchy", I'm sure I don't have a
much better idea of what you might mean by that than you have.

Are you a pure anarchist, a rational anarchist, anarchist when
convenient?
Consult your dictionaries or old poly sci textbooks. Or, are you a
good
witch or a bad witch? Answer either question and get bonus points.

Good Lor, it not only reads Kiplin, but Heinlei as well! But then,
old news is no news, ainna? I tell you what though, some day.....when
your tastes mature a bit.....you may want to move on to the master,
himself. Nietzch is, overall, vastly more amusing than
Heinlei.....though not as tittilating, perhaps.

Um.......you DO know that words have meanings, right? I mean, I
don't want
to appear to be unduly demanding or anything.....I don't, for
example,
expect you to know what meanings go with which words....but you ARE
aware
that there is some sort of correlation, right?

That is my understanding. You, however, seem confused by the
concept that
organized anarchy is in effect, not anarchy at all.

Well, Willi is serving detention right now, but after school you might
want to get together with him and discuss this matter of how things
seem. I suspect he'll be able to give you oodles of help.

I've always been amused at the concept that anarchy can be a system
of
government to any degree of reality.

We can only imagine and wonder at the drolleries that keep you
chortling over your sherry.....or amantillado, as the case may be.

Equally, I've been amused at student
revolutionaries, who've never held a firearm or a Molotov cocktail,

But, if everyone were burning babies, the demand would soon outstrip
the supply, and then where would the next generation of cannon
fo.......er......patriots come from? No, I'm afraid the masses will
have to continue to live vicariously through you.

seen
trauma beyond the random parking lot scuffle, or worked for their
consumer
goods, demanding and desiring the type of social and economic
restructuring
that would guarantee that they would never again set foot on campus
or use
their parent provided consumer goods. Once in a while, I find
myself
wishing them a small dose of what they demonstrate for.

You know, I've been willing to shrug it off as some sort of
miscommunication, but it's becoming too obvious to ignore.....you
really don't know that the sixties are over, do you?

But my better
nature and my own desire for creature comforts prevails.

Your desire for creature comforts doubtless trumps everything but your
willingness to use whatever old corpses and make however many new ones
it takes to prop up your self-image.

Your statement, to me, seems to indicate that rather than
participate
actively in any political system, you simply justify opting out and
sniping
from the sidelines by claiming to be an anarchist. It is an easy
copout.

Actually, it's more a case of finding cheap amusement in being
lectured to by a marionette.

Of course, given the nature of usenet communications, you could be
quite an
active participant in local and other politics and simply be driven
to
making such statements to the contrary by boredom, SAD, or some
other
causation.

Hm.......well, I don't see what any of that has to do with the nature
of usenet communications but as for the rest of the analysis, I'd have
to say....mmmmm.....could be.

So, as winter locks you into its grip and sunlight hours
decrease, may you find some degree of comfort in your dictionaries,
manuals
of grammar and syntax,

O.k., and you have fun with your cowboy books!

and your insistence in using multiple periods to no
real end but to fill space on a monitor and perhaps exercise your
right ring
finger. ..............Or do you, .......perhaps.......just ....have
a
sticky..........keyboard?

Keyboard's fine, and..............SURPRISE!...........I have several
fingers on my right hand.

Wolfgang

"Wolfgang" wrote in news:braftr$16p37$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:

We can only imagine and wonder at the drolleries that keep you
chortling over your sherry.....or amantillado, as the case may be.


Aren't amantillados the only animal model for leprosy??

Scott

On 11 Dec 2003 19:19:58 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote in news:braftr$16p37$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:

We can only imagine and wonder at the drolleries that keep you
chortling over your sherry.....or amantillado, as the case may be.


Aren't amantillados the only animal model for leprosy??

Scott

If they're not, they should be. Dadnabbed armor plated rats!

g.c.

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Scott Seidman wrote:

"Wolfgang" wrote in news:braftr$16p37$1@ID-

We can only imagine and wonder at the drolleries that keep you
chortling over your sherry.....or amantillado, as the case may be.

Aren't amantillados the only animal model for leprosy??

My dear Fortunato ...

(c'mon Wolfgang, take the fly,... take it)

Mu