![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/27/2010 02:49 PM, flebow wrote:
Todd You should know that the person you are trying to argue w or match wits wits with is a flaming, obnoxious and notorious asshole Do not put up with him calling you an idiot and a moron or any other Hi Flebow, I take your point. I would not characterize him the way you did, but instead, I would characterize him as a "cantankerous misanthrope" -- much cleaner and more accurate. (I am sure he will correct me if he finds me inaccurate.) "idiot and a moron" are the least of the things he has called me. Wait until he calls you a child molester for witnessing your religion to him, which I did find very disgusting and I told him so. He has also questioned my intelligence when I made the statement that I thought trout when created by God. I do believe I just let that one slide. But I don't remember. Still, a tiny part of me, and I can not explain why, finds him a just a tiny bit endearing. There is no explanation. I would say it was appreciation for the time he went after a guy who had decided to stock me, but I found him a tiny bit endearing before that. I am really not sparring with him, other than gentle teasing, like trying to get him to call me a "nitwit", when I write back to him. I am really writing out of friendship, although we are not really friends. I am okay with him. And I do take your point. -T |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-08-27 21:43:49 -0400, Todd said:
Still, a tiny part of me, and I can not explain why, finds him a just a tiny bit endearing. There is no explanation. I would say it was appreciation for the time he went after a guy who had decided to stock me, but I found him a tiny bit endearing before that. LOL. It's call "stalk", not stock, you nitwit. And I wasn't stalking you. I was having fun with a sock puppet. Dave (and Wolfgang as *always* gone after this "guy." It's fun for both of us.) d;o) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 27, 8:43*pm, Todd wrote:
Hi Flebow, I take your point. *I would not characterize him the way you did, but instead, I would characterize him as a "cantankerous misanthrope" -- much cleaner and more accurate. *(I am sure he will correct me if he finds me inaccurate.) To be sure. Now, why don't you go ahead and tell us what you think the words "cantankerous" and "misanthrope" mean. Then I'll correct you if you are wrong. "idiot and a moron" are the least of the things he has called me. Value judgment. Highly idiosycratic and impossible to refute with any authority. Wait until he calls you a child molester for witnessing your religion to him, Did I do that? Wow. I had no idea that I am that insightful. which I did find very disgusting and I told him so. Hm..... Was I crushed? He has also questioned my intelligence when I made the statement that I thought trout when created by God. Now, lets be honest here. You don't REALLY believe that's the only time I've "questioned" your intelligence, do you? I mean, that would be kinda dumb, don'tcha think? I do believe I just let that one slide. *But I don't remember. Well, I don't remember either. It's a shame. We might have learned something.....and now it's lost forever. Hm......no, wait a minute! Maybe not forever! We could do it again and see what happens. Whattya think? Still, a tiny part of me, and I can not explain why, finds him a just a tiny bit endearing. *There is no explanation. Actually, there IS an explanation. It's the love that shines through in everything I write. There's just no hiding that light under a bushel. I would say it was appreciation for the time he went after a guy who had decided to stock me, There was good and sufficient reason for that. You just don't strike me as an off the shelf kind of guy. but I found him a tiny bit endearing before that. I love ya man.....but you ain't getting my beer. I am really not sparring with him, Truth. other than gentle teasing, like trying to get him to call me a "nitwit", when I write back to him. I think maybe you'd have better luck trying to get me to call you "Roxanne" or "parabola." Or, maybe not. But, hell, what's it cost to try, ainna? I am really writing out of friendship, That's sweet.....really. although we are not really friends. No, I guess we aren't. Does that seem sad to you? Sometimes it doesn't seem that way to me.....but I just get all in a muddle when we do this. ![]() I am okay with him. That's two of us, then, Who knows?.....there may be others.* And I do take your point. You should give it back. His hat's gonna blow off. -T g. *the odds? i dunno. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/27/2010 08:13 PM, Giles wrote:
There was good and sufficient reason for that. You just don't strike me as an off the shelf kind of guy. You got me there. I really am weirder than hell: I sort of, kind of like you a tiny bit. -T |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-08-27 23:31:25 -0400, Todd said:
On 08/27/2010 08:13 PM, Giles wrote: There was good and sufficient reason for that. You just don't strike me as an off the shelf kind of guy. You got me there. I really am weirder than hell: I sort of, kind of like you a tiny bit. -T Ahhhh, ain't it grand? Love at first slight. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/27/2010 08:13 PM, Giles wrote:
There was good and sufficient reason for that. You just don't strike me as an off the shelf kind of guy. You got me there. I really am weirder than hell: I sort of, kind of like you a tiny bit. -T |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/27/2010 08:13 PM, Giles wrote:
I would characterize him as a "cantankerous misanthrope" -- much cleaner and more accurate. (I am sure he will correct me if he finds me inaccurate.) To be sure. Now, why don't you go ahead and tell us what you think the words "cantankerous" and "misanthrope" mean. Then I'll correct you if you are wrong. http://dictionary.reference.com/brow...tankerous?r=75 –adjective disagreeable to deal with; contentious; peevish: a cantankerous, argumentative man. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/misanthrope –noun a hater of humankind. How did I do? I would say it was appreciation for the time he went after a guy who had decided to stock me, There was good and sufficient reason for that. You just don't strike me as an off the shelf kind of guy. You got me there. I am really, really unique. You might even say a bit weird. The good kind of weird. -T |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 27, 10:44*pm, Todd wrote:
On 08/27/2010 08:13 PM, Giles wrote: I would characterize him as a "cantankerous misanthrope" -- much cleaner and more accurate. *(I am sure he will correct me if he finds me inaccurate.) To be sure. *Now, why don't you go ahead and tell us what you think the words "cantankerous" and "misanthrope" mean. *Then I'll correct you if you are wrong. http://dictionary.reference.com/brow...tankerous?r=75 –adjective disagreeable to deal with; contentious; peevish: a cantankerous, argumentative man. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/misanthrope –noun a hater of humankind. How did I do? Absurdly generous to the core, I'll take it as a given that you transcribed what you found in the dictionary more or less faithfully. But that isn't necessarily the same thing as knowing what the words mean, is it? Moreover, even a complete understanding of definition does not in itself imply a correct application. So, how'd you do? About like always. I would say it was appreciation for the time he went after a guy who had decided to stock me, There was good and sufficient reason for that. *You just don't strike me as an off the shelf kind of guy. You got me there. Hm..... Or maybe you don't know what you said and what I said. I am really, really unique. Yes, we all are. It's one of the many things we all have in common.....however shameful the realization may be for some of us. You might even say a bit weird. You might say that. I probably wouldn't. And that strikes to the heart of this conversation (as well as others we've had and, doubtless, more to come). By now you should really have some sort of idea of the sort of thing I might say.....and you evidently don't. The good kind of weird. And what kind would that be? g. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/27/2010 08:56 PM, Giles wrote:
The good kind of weird. And what kind would that be? ah, well, hmm, that would be, well, me. Always a pleasure, my almost friend. -T |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trout art | Frank Church | Fly Fishing | 4 | September 2nd, 2005 11:34 PM |
trout | snakefiddler | Fly Fishing | 9 | May 26th, 2004 01:03 AM |
CT Trout Opener ... trout parks | Outdoors Magazine | Fly Fishing | 0 | March 30th, 2004 02:49 PM |
Have You Ever Been a Trout Bum? | @(Peter A. Collin)rochester.rr.com | Fly Fishing | 11 | February 7th, 2004 03:55 AM |
Trout | Bob | Fly Fishing Tying | 7 | November 2nd, 2003 05:09 PM |