OT - a rational, fair republican voice?

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp

On 2010-09-29 18:24:23 -0400, jeff said:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp

How

about a rational, fair Democrat's voice?

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39517

It works. Obamaism doesn't.

Dave

On 2010-09-29 18:24:23 -0400, jeff said:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp

I

prefer the company of peasants because they have not been educated
sufficiently to reason incorrectly
Montaigne

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:24:23 -0400, jeff wrote:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp

Rational? Seemingly. Fair? Who knows. And the unasked question: Accurate?
Not in the least.

HTH,
R

On 9/29/2010 7:44 PM, D. LaCourse wrote:
On 2010-09-29 18:24:23 -0400, jeff said:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp


How

about a rational, fair Democrat's voice?

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39517

It works. Obamaism doesn't.

Dave



dave...do you remember the tax rate during that period?

wtf is "Obamaism"?

jeff

On 9/29/2010 9:48 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:24:23 -0400, wrote:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp

Rational? Seemingly. Fair? Who knows. And the unasked question: Accurate?
Not in the least.

HTH,
R

and how is that guy "inaccurate"? at least he goes about the question
and process without the divisive phony rhetoric being seized upon by the
anti-anything-obama politicians.

jeff

On 2010-09-30 07:30:04 -0400, jeff said:

On 9/29/2010 7:44 PM, D. LaCourse wrote:
On 2010-09-29 18:24:23 -0400, jeff said:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...eria/?src=dayp


How

about

a rational, fair Democrat's voice?

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39517

It works. Obamaism doesn't.

Dave



dave...do you remember the tax rate during that period?

I remember being VERY poor as a First Class Petty Officer in the Navy.
I remember that JFK gave me a wonderful gift by lowering my taxes
*drastically*, and improving the military.

wtf is "Obamaism"?

Call it Obamanomics. It sure as hell doesn't work. Our country is
losing its greatness and becoming a 3rd world nation. If we continue
on this path, there WILL be a revolution. Count on it. People are
****ed, even the poor ones. My grandchildren (the three grown and
working ones) are very angry at what WE have done to their future. They
realize that we have a president that is good at three things:
Campaigning, spending, and blaming.

Dave

Democrat strategy:

1. Spend all the money
2. Blame Bush
3. Take a vacation





wtf is "Obamaism"?

Call it Obamanomics. *It sure as hell doesn't work. *Our country is
losing its greatness and becoming a 3rd world nation. *If we continue
on this path, there WILL be a revolution. *Count on it. *People are
****ed, even the poor ones. *My grandchildren (the three grown and
working ones) are very angry at what WE have done to their future. They
realize that we have a president that is good at three things: *
Campaigning, spending, and blaming.

Dave

I still don't get no one talks about separating personal and corporate
income tax -- it's like Republicans know that without the claim of
"hurting small business" they have nothing to stand on. BTW plenty of
small businesses that actually employ people make barely any profit,
so raising their rates doesn't really matter, and many _highly_
profitable "small businesses" are essentially self-employed
consultants in wall street, banking, and other sectors where money
flows freely. They aren't creating any jobs. I say tax 'em! Down with
plutocracy!

Jon.

On Sep 30, 5:34*am, jeff wrote:
On 9/29/2010 9:48 PM, wrote:

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:24:23 -0400, *wrote:

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...small-business....

Rational? *Seemingly. *Fair? *Who knows. *And the unasked question: Accurate?
Not in the least.

HTH,
R

and how is that guy "inaccurate"? *at least he goes about the question
and process without the divisive phony rhetoric being seized upon by the
anti-anything-obama politicians.

jeff

Obama has been a chucklehead ever since he came on the scene. He is an
empty suit
devoid of any executive experience or common sense. He won the
election ( & "noble" peace
prize ) based on platitudes and intangible concepts. He truly is
lighter than air.

Barak Obama is living proof that when the going gets tough, the
lightweights go on vacation.
He and his mindless followers all chant oBAMa...um, um, um.... before
they drink the Kool Aid.......