Um, Ken..., or, suddenly, $24,000.00 for a evening out in NYC seems like a bargain...

On Nov 8, 11:03*am, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Ken Fortenberry

wrote:
Seymour Hersh is a Pulitzer prize winning investigative journalist.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

You are the gullible dimbulb who swallows nonsensical anti-Obama
fabrications from the far-right whackosphere and regurgitates them
to a fly fishing group.

Yeah, uh-huh - whatever you and Stormin' Mormon, the Latter-day Loon, et al,
need to tell yourselves...



Hope this helps.

--
Ken Fortenberry

IAC, Hersh is to journalism, even Glenn Beck/Keith Olbermann/Rush Limbaugh/Chris
Matthews "journalism," what potted meat and Ripple are to...I was going to say
"fine dining," but the "fine" isn't even necessary...

As to Hersh, 40 years ago, he essentially weaseled a Pulitzer (which, while
somewhat prestigious - but OTOH, Roget Ebert won one - is often, well, not
exactly objective, both as to liberal leanings as well as emotional sway, and
has had brushes with Hershesque nonsense, ala Janet Cooke) by being given the
basics and overall framework of a legit story and then, fabricating a fair
amount of the peripheral details. *And amusingly, he has managed to make quite a
"career" for himself by feeding whatever flames happen to be crackling with a
lot of hot air and cow chips. *And you might notice, he's not been awarded
another (or AFAIK, been remotely close to another), despite what you appear to
believe is a stellar career as an "investigative journalist." *Simply, he's a
running ****ing joke among many actual journalists of every personal political
leaning.

The really funny part is that if you accept what Hersh writes as _fact_, Obama,
as it turns out, is actually more of a war criminal, not to mention an amoral
liar, than what he alleges Dick Cheney to be.

HTH,
R

No, the really funny part is both of you pathetic imbeciles actually
believe that you have something to say.....or you don't.

Either way, its ****ing hilarious.

Moron.

g.