![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/08/2011 08:32 AM, Russell D. wrote:
On 01/07/2011 09:45 PM, Steve W. wrote: Giles wrote: On Jan 6, 11:44 pm, wrote: On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 19:22:02 -0800 (PST), wrote: THIS is what comes of having a family! I do not recommend it. : ( *snippage* giles who, like he ain't already got enough to do! Cool. I looked at my first e-reader this holiday past and I too have to admit that I was impressed. I downloaded books into my Palm Z22 for years and when you had the auto scrolll set right it wasn't a bad way to read books. But the Nook I looked at had fantastic resolution on the print in comparison. I am considering a purchase. Geo. C. I used a Sony hend-held for several years. It was way cool to be able to download books and carry them around in my pocket. But after the inital buzz wore off, honest evaluation set in. It was a very tedious way to read for many reasons. The Kindle (and others of its ilk, I assume) is a vast improvement. First and foremost, it looks and feels and reads much like a book. This is crucially important. However, I've already noted some things I'd change. First, a book should open to two facing pages. Anything else is just not right. And I'm not crazy about moving about from page to page by pushing a button. I'd much rather "flip" the pages by swiping them with a fingertip. I-Pad does all the above BUT at a price... The biggest of which is eye strain. Extended reading on a back-lit screen can be very tiring. Russell Some day, I'll have to retire the old Palm M515 I've been using as a "book" in favor of the real thing. It'd be nice to be able to see more than one paragraph at a time. Still, for now it seems that all I read are college textbooks. I'll wait a few months until I can once again read for pleasure rather than the memorization of facts and factoids. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 5:47*pm, Mark Allread none@none wrote:
Some day, I'll have to retire the old Palm M515 I've been using as a "book" in favor of the real thing. It'd be nice to be able to see more than one paragraph at a time. Still, for now it seems that all I read are college textbooks. I'll wait a few months until I can once again read for pleasure rather than the memorization of facts and factoids. Not to belittle memorization of facts and factoids (as noble a pursuit as most humans seem incapable of imagining.....let alone pursuing or accomplishing), but reading for pleasure (which, it should be remembered, by no means precludes edification) is, at one and the same time, among both the most selfish and most selfless of all the activities that one can engage in. But, as is often the case, Mr. Clemens said it better.....and more succinctly: "The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them." Food (and good, nutritious food at that) for thought. Wolfgang |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Giles wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:47 pm, Mark Allread none@none wrote: Some day, I'll have to retire the old Palm M515 I've been using as a "book" in favor of the real thing. It'd be nice to be able to see more than one paragraph at a time. Still, for now it seems that all I read are college textbooks. I'll wait a few months until I can once again read for pleasure rather than the memorization of facts and factoids. Not to belittle memorization of facts and factoids (as noble a pursuit as most humans seem incapable of imagining.....let alone pursuing or accomplishing), but reading for pleasure (which, it should be remembered, by no means precludes edification) is, at one and the same time, among both the most selfish and most selfless of all the activities that one can engage in. But, as is often the case, Mr. Clemens said it better.....and more succinctly: "The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them." Food (and good, nutritious food at that) for thought. Wolfgang I'll read just about anything. From classic stuff to tech manuals. Started that well before I started school. Had an extended stay in a hospital when I was about 4 and got so bored I started reading anything I could get. I had nurses bringing me in books from home and the local library as well as the ones my parents would bring down. Fast forward a few years to a speed reading course in HS. The teacher there started out with a speed and comprehension study to see where we were starting at. The only problem was that I was way off the top end of the chart. Without skipping words or paragraphs the way she wanted us to do. I ended up taking the final the second day of class. During the same time frame I was also a Literacy volunteer at the local neighborhood center. -- Steve W. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 10:53*pm, "Steve W." wrote:
Giles wrote: ...as is often the case, Mr. Clemens said it better.....and more succinctly: "The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them." Food (and good, nutritious food at that) for thought. Wolfgang I'll read just about anything. From classic stuff to tech manuals. I'll read tech manuals......under either of two sets of conditions. One, I absolutely MUST have the information, and there is no other way to get it or, two, there is absolutely nothing else to do and abolutely no other reading material available. Fotunately, both sets of conditions are rare, and the latter increasingly so as I now have a virtually unlimited set of books available at all times.....no more sitting in the waiting room and suddenly discovering that there are only two pages left! There's other stuff that I won't willingly touch, but not so much that I don't feel justified in claiming rather broad tastes. I've only got a few pages of Burroughs' "A Princess of Mars" left. Classic trash.....but trash nevertheless. Luckily, Twain's dictum does not preclude ingestion of materials entirely devoid of nutritional content. ![]() Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|