![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 3:12*am, Bob wrote:
On Mar 18, 7:24*pm, Giles wrote: *to speak of many things. What happened, apparently (no one will ever know the details), was that Karl had an encounter with a "widow maker", a term that he may or may not have been familiar with. *He certainly knew the actuality, if not the English name. *The severely leaning birch tree whose base he was lying next to had been notched.....perfectly done, no problem. But somewhere in the backcut the tree split up to about eight feet above ground level. *A common enough nightmare that almost always has no memorable consequences. *ALMOST always. *This time.....well, it bucked.....it got him.....and he'll never remember it. *And the rest of us will never forget it. Actually the type of accident you describe (here in big timber country we call it a barber chair) is *one of the most common causes of death or serious injury in timber falling accidents. Never heard the term "barber chair" before in this context. Easy enough to understand, though. It's also easy to believe that it ranks high as a cause of death or injury. Do you have ready access to any numbers? Many hardwoods (including Birch) are quite prone to splitting as you described sometime during the back cut - especially if they have a heavy lean. I've seen it happen a couple of times myself. Didn't know that birch was a frequent offender. Though many saw hands scoff at the practice as being sissy, the safest way to fell such trees is to bind the butt (immediately above where the top of the notch cut will be) with heavy duty nylon webbing (made to handle the extreme forces involved) before starting any cuts. This, too, is news to me. I'd appreciate any more inofrmation you could provide as I'll be doing a lot of cutting here in the next few months. The old saying that "There are bold timber fallers and there are old timber fallers, but few are lucky enough to be old bold timber fallers." is quite true. There have been times and arenas in life when I've flirted with the bold thing. I was lucky. I try hard not to do that anymore. Never did it in connection with tree falling. But, like just about anyone, I suppose, I've been careless on occasion. I don't think Karl was particularly bold.....and he was certainly getting old at 69. He may or may not have been careless.....I don't know whether he had ever heard of the practice of binding trees with webbing. At any rate, it now looks as if this "bad luck" may have been preventable. Casts the whole mess in a different light. Much to think about. Thanks, Bob giles |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Giles wrote in news:478b6b73-8443-458c-95e0-
: giles Moron!!!! ****-for-Brains!!!!! ConRad |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 8:55*pm, ConwayRadis wrote:
Giles wrote in news:478b6b73-8443-458c-95e0- : giles Moron!!!! ****-for-Brains!!!!! ConRad Well, you're certainly right about one thing....."who" you are doesn't matter. But you just couldn't resist the temptation to show the world "what" you are, eh? g. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 4:29*am, Giles wrote:
On Mar 19, 3:12*am, Bob wrote: Actually the type of accident you describe (here in big timber country we call it a barber chair) is *one of the most common causes of death or serious injury in timber falling accidents. Never heard the term "barber chair" before in this context. *Easy enough to understand, though. *It's also easy to believe that it ranks high as a cause of death or injury. *Do you have ready access to any numbers? Many years ago when I was involved in logging supervision, I used to receive regular accident reports from Oregon OSHA on serious logging accidents. Death & serious injury from barber chairs were always high on the list. I imagine OSHA still keeps such statistics. Many (including Birch) are quite prone to splitting as you described sometime during the back cut - especially if they have a heavy lean. I've seen it happen a couple of times myself. *Didn't know that birch was a frequent offender. Though many saw hands scoff at the practice as being sissy, the safest way to fell such trees is to bind the butt (immediately above where the top of the notch cut will be) with heavy duty nylon webbing (made to handle the extreme forces involved) before starting any cuts. This, too, is news to me. *I'd appreciate any more inofrmation you could provide as I'll be doing a lot of cutting here in the next few months. I probably should have used the term strapping rather then webbing. The type of nylon web strap that log truck drivers in many areas use to bind down their loads is what is used. Any good saw shop in an area where there is much commercial logging going on could make one up for you in a size to handle the size trees you will be working with. It should be used on any tree with a very heavy lean (especially hardwoods) or one with a very unbalanced crown (heavy in the direction of fall). The old saying that "There are bold timber fallers and there are old timber fallers, but few are lucky enough to be old bold timber fallers." is quite true. There have been times and arenas in life when I've flirted with the bold thing. *I was lucky. *I try hard not to do that anymore. *Never did it in connection with tree falling. *But, like just about anyone, I suppose, I've been careless on occasion. *I don't think Karl was particularly bold.....and he was certainly getting old at 69. *He may or may not have been careless.....I don't know whether he had ever heard of the practice of binding trees with webbing. At any rate, it now looks as if this "bad luck" may have been preventable. *Casts the whole mess in a different light. Much to think about. Thanks, Bob giles Bob Weinberger DuPont, WA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 8:45*pm, Bob wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:29*am, Giles wrote: On Mar 19, 3:12*am, Bob wrote: Actually the type of accident you describe (here in big timber country we call it a barber chair) is *one of the most common causes of death or serious injury in timber falling accidents. Never heard the term "barber chair" before in this context. *Easy enough to understand, though. *It's also easy to believe that it ranks high as a cause of death or injury. *Do you have ready access to any numbers? *Many years ago when I was involved in logging supervision, I used to receive regular accident reports from Oregon OSHA on serious logging accidents. *Death & serious injury from barber chairs were always high on the list. *I imagine OSHA still keeps such statistics. Many (including Birch) are quite prone to splitting as you described sometime during the back cut - especially if they have a heavy lean. I've seen it happen a couple of times myself. *Didn't know that birch was a frequent offender. Though many saw hands scoff at the practice as being sissy, the safest way to fell such trees is to bind the butt (immediately above where the top of the notch cut will be) with heavy duty nylon webbing (made to handle the extreme forces involved) before starting any cuts. This, too, is news to me. *I'd appreciate any more inofrmation you could provide as I'll be doing a lot of cutting here in the next few months. I probably should have used the term strapping rather then webbing. The type of nylon web strap that log truck drivers in many areas use to bind down their loads is what is used. Any good saw shop in an area where there is much commercial logging going on could make one up for you in a size to handle the size trees you will be working with. *It should be used on any tree with a very heavy lean (especially hardwoods) or one with a very unbalanced crown (heavy in the direction of fall). The old saying that "There are bold timber fallers and there are old timber fallers, but few are lucky enough to be old bold timber fallers." is quite true. There have been times and arenas in life when I've flirted with the bold thing. *I was lucky. *I try hard not to do that anymore. *Never did it in connection with tree falling. *But, like just about anyone, I suppose, I've been careless on occasion. *I don't think Karl was particularly bold.....and he was certainly getting old at 69. *He may or may not have been careless.....I don't know whether he had ever heard of the practice of binding trees with webbing. At any rate, it now looks as if this "bad luck" may have been preventable. *Casts the whole mess in a different light. Much to think about. Thanks, Bob giles Bob Weinberger * *DuPont, WA Hi, everyone. Wolfgang - thanks for that story, entertaining and thought provoking, as always. And thanks, Bob, too, for sharing from your expertise. Please forgive this question - I'm not too embarrassed to say that I don't quite get the mechanics of this accident. google image search of "logging accident barber chair" produced this: http://www.forestryforum.com/images/...arberchair.jpg Is the issue that part of the tree from *below* the intended cut gets split along with the main part of the tree and that's what swings up with bad potential results? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 8:02*pm, "dr.narcolepsy" wrote:
On Mar 21, 8:45*pm, Bob wrote: On Mar 19, 4:29*am, Giles wrote: On Mar 19, 3:12*am, Bob wrote: Actually the type of accident you describe (here in big timber country we call it a barber chair) is *one of the most common causes of death or serious injury in timber falling accidents. Never heard the term "barber chair" before in this context. *Easy enough to understand, though. *It's also easy to believe that it ranks high as a cause of death or injury. *Do you have ready access to any numbers? *Many years ago when I was involved in logging supervision, I used to receive regular accident reports from Oregon OSHA on serious logging accidents. *Death & serious injury from barber chairs were always high on the list. *I imagine OSHA still keeps such statistics. Many (including Birch) are quite prone to splitting as you described sometime during the back cut - especially if they have a heavy lean.. I've seen it happen a couple of times myself. *Didn't know that birch was a frequent offender. Though many saw hands scoff at the practice as being sissy, the safest way to fell such trees is to bind the butt (immediately above where the top of the notch cut will be) with heavy duty nylon webbing (made to handle the extreme forces involved) before starting any cuts. This, too, is news to me. *I'd appreciate any more inofrmation you could provide as I'll be doing a lot of cutting here in the next few months. I probably should have used the term strapping rather then webbing. The type of nylon web strap that log truck drivers in many areas use to bind down their loads is what is used. Any good saw shop in an area where there is much commercial logging going on could make one up for you in a size to handle the size trees you will be working with. *It should be used on any tree with a very heavy lean (especially hardwoods) or one with a very unbalanced crown (heavy in the direction of fall). The old saying that "There are bold timber fallers and there are old timber fallers, but few are lucky enough to be old bold timber fallers." is quite true. There have been times and arenas in life when I've flirted with the bold thing. *I was lucky. *I try hard not to do that anymore. *Never did it in connection with tree falling. *But, like just about anyone, I suppose, I've been careless on occasion. *I don't think Karl was particularly bold.....and he was certainly getting old at 69. *He may or may not have been careless.....I don't know whether he had ever heard of the practice of binding trees with webbing. At any rate, it now looks as if this "bad luck" may have been preventable. *Casts the whole mess in a different light. Much to think about. Thanks, Bob giles Bob Weinberger * *DuPont, WA Hi, everyone. *Wolfgang - thanks for that story, entertaining and thought provoking, as always. *And thanks, Bob, too, for sharing from your expertise. Please forgive this question - I'm not too embarrassed to say that I don't quite get the mechanics of this accident. google image search of "logging accident barber chair" produced this:http://www.forestryforum.com/images/...arberchair.jpg Is the issue that part of the tree from *below* the intended cut gets split along with the main part of the tree and that's what swings up with bad potential results? I can't speak with any authority to what happens generally, but in Karl's case, and as I have seen before, the split occurs (or, starts, anyway) right at the place where the back cut is made. The illustration at the site you pointed us to is a bit misleading in that it doesn't show the notch, which is precisely opposite where the split has occured and where the sawyer has met his doom. Of course, the result shown can also happen without a notch having been cut at all (as shown) but common practice, as far as I know, includes notching on the side toward which the tree is intended to fall. However, this may indeed not be the case where trees lean severely and where they are intended to fall in the direction of the lean. Obviously, cutting opposite this direction will produce the intended result without a notch.....but the possible consequences (with or without the notch, for all I know) are now all too obvious. In any case, the answer to your question would appear to be no.....the split starts at the backcut and moves up through the trunk.....or so it has always been in my admittedly limited experience. Incidentally, I've seen in happen even with small trees and without any significant lean. And, unlike what is shown in the illustration, the busted end does not necessarily always simply lever up. It will often kcik back as well. Imagine the broken end actually moving toward the sawyer so that even if he were standing several feet back from where he is shown in the illustration. Depending on circumstances, he might still be toast. And, of course, it is not just whole standing trees that are dangerous. I narrowly missed being decapitated myself by a four inch cherry branch last spring. The tree was already down......dropped by a much larger oak that took several other trees with it. The cherry branch was obviously under tension.....had a significant bend to it. I misjudged the angle of the bend or the forces at play or one thing or another. I cut it and felt the wind whizzing past my left ear before the import of what had just happened (or not.....depending on point of view.....I'm glad to report that I'm in a position to take the latter) registered in my brain or Becky's; she was about fifteen feet away, waiting to load up the sawn firewood. Any way you look at it, wherever the sound of a chainsaw penetrates (or any other saw) there is danger aplenty. But then, the same can be said for any place that such sounds never reach. giles who has known all his life (on a more or less intellectual level) that one way or another they WILL get you in the end. it's just in the past few decades that a more personal and visceral point of view has come to hold sway. ![]() p.s. Karl died about 2 or 3 a.m. on saturday. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 7:10*pm, Giles wrote:
You've done a good job of describing the barber chair phenomenon. As you have learned, a dangerous situation exists anytime one is cutting a tree, log, or even a branch that is under tension. Binding the butt of the tree can prevent most barber chair accidents, but just as you wouldn't knowingly place yourself in line with the muzzle of a firearm just because the safety is engaged, you should never place yourself (or any part of your body) in a direct line with the direction of tension. Bob Weinberger - DuPont,WA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Giles wrote in
: On Mar 21, 8:02*pm, "dr.narcolepsy" wrote: On Mar 21, 8:45*pm, Bob wrote: On Mar 19, 4:29*am, Giles wrote: On Mar 19, 3:12*am, Bob wrote: Actually the type of accident you describe (here in big timber coun try we call it a barber chair) is *one of the most common causes of d eath or serious injury in timber falling accidents. Never heard the term "barber chair" before in this context. *Easy enough to understand, though. *It's also easy to believe that it ra nks high as a cause of death or injury. *Do you have ready access to an y numbers? *Many years ago when I was involved in logging supervision, I used to receive regular accident reports from Oregon OSHA on serious logging accidents. *Death & serious injury from barber chairs were always hig h on the list. *I imagine OSHA still keeps such statistics. Many (including Birch) are quite prone to splitting as you described sometime during the back cut - especially if they have a heavy lean . I've seen it happen a couple of times myself. *Didn't know that bir ch was a frequent offender. Though many saw hands scoff at the practice as being sissy, the saf est way to fell such trees is to bind the butt (immediately above where the top of the notch cut will be) with heavy duty nylon webbing (ma de to handle the extreme forces involved) before starting any cuts. This, too, is news to me. *I'd appreciate any more inofrmation you could provide as I'll be doing a lot of cutting here in the next few months. I probably should have used the term strapping rather then webbing. The type of nylon web strap that log truck drivers in many areas use to bind down their loads is what is used. Any good saw shop in an area where there is much commercial logging going on could make one up for you in a size to handle the size trees you will be working with. *It should be used on any tree with a very heavy lean (especially hardwoods) or one with a very unbalanced crown (heavy in the direction of fall). The old saying that "There are bold timber fallers and there are old timber fallers, but few are lucky enough to be old bold timber fallers." is quite true. There have been times and arenas in life when I've flirted with the bold thing. *I was lucky. *I try hard not to do that anymore. * Never did it in connection with tree falling. *But, like just about anyon e, I suppose, I've been careless on occasion. *I don't think Karl was particularly bold.....and he was certainly getting old at 69. *He m ay or may not have been careless.....I don't know whether he had ever heard of the practice of binding trees with webbing. At any rate, it now looks as if this "bad luck" may have been preventable. *Casts the whole mess in a different light. Much to think about. Thanks, Bob giles Bob Weinberger * *DuPont, WA Hi, everyone. *Wolfgang - thanks for that story, entertaining and thought provoking, as always. *And thanks, Bob, too, for sharing from your expertise. Please forgive this question - I'm not too embarrassed to say that I don't quite get the mechanics of this accident. google image search of "logging accident barber chair" produced this:http ://www.forestryforum.com/images/YaBBImages/userpics/barberchair.jpg Is the issue that part of the tree from *below* the intended cut gets split along with the main part of the tree and that's what swings up with bad potential results? I can't speak with any authority to what happens generally, but in Karl's case, and as I have seen before, the split occurs (or, starts, anyway) right at the place where the back cut is made. The illustration at the site you pointed us to is a bit misleading in that it doesn't show the notch, which is precisely opposite where the split has occured and where the sawyer has met his doom. Of course, the result shown can also happen without a notch having been cut at all (as shown) but common practice, as far as I know, includes notching on the side toward which the tree is intended to fall. However, this may indeed not be the case where trees lean severely and where they are intended to fall in the direction of the lean. Obviously, cutting opposite this direction will produce the intended result without a notch.....but the possible consequences (with or without the notch, for all I know) are now all too obvious. In any case, the answer to your question would appear to be no.....the split starts at the backcut and moves up through the trunk.....or so it has always been in my admittedly limited experience. Incidentally, I've seen in happen even with small trees and without any significant lean. And, unlike what is shown in the illustration, the busted end does not necessarily always simply lever up. It will often kcik back as well. Imagine the broken end actually moving toward the sawyer so that even if he were standing several feet back from where he is shown in the illustration. Depending on circumstances, he might still be toast. And, of course, it is not just whole standing trees that are dangerous. I narrowly missed being decapitated myself by a four inch cherry branch last spring. The tree was already down......dropped by a much larger oak that took several other trees with it. The cherry branch was obviously under tension.....had a significant bend to it. I misjudged the angle of the bend or the forces at play or one thing or another. I cut it and felt the wind whizzing past my left ear before the import of what had just happened (or not.....depending on point of view.....I'm glad to report that I'm in a position to take the latter) registered in my brain or Becky's; she was about fifteen feet away, waiting to load up the sawn firewood. Any way you look at it, wherever the sound of a chainsaw penetrates (or any other saw) there is danger aplenty. But then, the same can be said for any place that such sounds never reach. giles who has known all his life (on a more or less intellectual level) that one way or another they WILL get you in the end. it's just in the past few decades that a more personal and visceral point of view has come to hold sway. ![]() p.s. Karl died about 2 or 3 a.m. on saturday. WTF does this irrelevant babbling about felling a MF-Tree have to do with FISHING????? I know, It's the 'old woman' in you that just can't resist the opportunity to go on, and on, about a nothing topic. All you need, you Old Bitch, is just the least bit of an chance to start up that super charged motor mouth of yours, and spew out from here to eternity! Babble on you crusty old witch!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 9:17*pm, ConwayRadis wrote:
Giles wrote : On Mar 21, 8:02*pm, "dr.narcolepsy" wrote: On Mar 21, 8:45*pm, Bob wrote: On Mar 19, 4:29*am, Giles wrote: On Mar 19, 3:12*am, Bob wrote: Actually the type of accident you describe (here in big timber coun try we call it a barber chair) is *one of the most common causes of d eath or serious injury in timber falling accidents. Never heard the term "barber chair" before in this context. *Easy enough to understand, though. *It's also easy to believe that it ra nks high as a cause of death or injury. *Do you have ready access to an y numbers? *Many years ago when I was involved in logging supervision, I used to receive regular accident reports from Oregon OSHA on serious logging accidents. *Death & serious injury from barber chairs were always hig h on the list. *I imagine OSHA still keeps such statistics. Many (including Birch) are quite prone to splitting as you described sometime during the back cut - especially if they have a heavy lean . I've seen it happen a couple of times myself. *Didn't know that bir ch was a frequent offender. Though many saw hands scoff at the practice as being sissy, the saf est way to fell such trees is to bind the butt (immediately above where the top of the notch cut will be) with heavy duty nylon webbing (ma de to handle the extreme forces involved) before starting any cuts. This, too, is news to me. *I'd appreciate any more inofrmation you could provide as I'll be doing a lot of cutting here in the next few months. I probably should have used the term strapping rather then webbing. The type of nylon web strap that log truck drivers in many areas use to bind down their loads is what is used. Any good saw shop in an area where there is much commercial logging going on could make one up for you in a size to handle the size trees you will be working with. *It should be used on any tree with a very heavy lean (especially hardwoods) or one with a very unbalanced crown (heavy in the direction of fall). The old saying that "There are bold timber fallers and there are old timber fallers, but few are lucky enough to be old bold timber fallers." is quite true. There have been times and arenas in life when I've flirted with the bold thing. *I was lucky. *I try hard not to do that anymore. * Never did it in connection with tree falling. *But, like just about anyon e, I suppose, I've been careless on occasion. *I don't think Karl was particularly bold.....and he was certainly getting old at 69. *He m ay or may not have been careless.....I don't know whether he had ever heard of the practice of binding trees with webbing. At any rate, it now looks as if this "bad luck" may have been preventable. *Casts the whole mess in a different light. Much to think about. Thanks, Bob giles Bob Weinberger * *DuPont, WA Hi, everyone. *Wolfgang - thanks for that story, entertaining and thought provoking, as always. *And thanks, Bob, too, for sharing from your expertise. Please forgive this question - I'm not too embarrassed to say that I don't quite get the mechanics of this accident. google image search of "logging accident barber chair" produced this:http ://www.forestryforum.com/images/YaBBImages/userpics/barberchair.jpg Is the issue that part of the tree from *below* the intended cut gets split along with the main part of the tree and that's what swings up with bad potential results? I can't speak with any authority to what happens generally, but in Karl's case, and as I have seen before, the split occurs (or, starts, anyway) right at the place *where the back cut is made. *The illustration at the site you pointed us to is a bit misleading in that it doesn't show the notch, which is precisely opposite where the split has occured and where the sawyer has met his doom. *Of course, the result shown can also happen without a notch having been cut at all (as shown) but common practice, as far as I know, includes notching on the side toward which the tree is intended to fall. *However, this may indeed not be the case where trees lean severely and where they are intended to fall in the direction of the lean. *Obviously, cutting opposite this direction will produce the intended result without a notch.....but the possible consequences (with or without the notch, for all I know) are now all too obvious. In any case, the answer to your question would appear to be no.....the split starts at the backcut and moves up through the trunk.....or so it has always been in my admittedly limited experience. Incidentally, I've seen in happen even with small trees and without any significant lean. *And, unlike what is shown in the illustration, the busted end does not necessarily always simply lever up. *It will often kcik back as well. *Imagine the broken end actually moving toward the sawyer so that even if he were standing several feet back from where he is shown in the illustration. *Depending on circumstances, he might still be toast. And, of course, it is not just whole standing trees that are dangerous. *I narrowly missed being decapitated myself by a four inch cherry branch last spring. *The tree was already down......dropped by a much larger oak that took several other trees with it. *The cherry branch was obviously under tension.....had a significant bend to it. I misjudged the angle of the bend or the forces at play or one thing or another. *I cut it and felt the wind whizzing past my left ear before the import of what had just happened (or not.....depending on point of view.....I'm glad to report that I'm in a position to take the latter) registered in my brain or Becky's; she was about fifteen feet away, waiting to load up the sawn firewood. Any way you look at it, wherever the sound of a chainsaw penetrates (or any other saw) there is danger aplenty. But then, the same can be said for any place that such sounds never reach. giles who has known all his life (on a more or less intellectual level) that one way or another they WILL get you in the end. *it's just in the past few decades that a more personal and visceral point of view has come to hold sway. * * * * ![]() p.s. *Karl died about 2 or 3 a.m. on saturday. WTF *does this irrelevant babbling about felling a MF-Tree have to do with FISHING????? I know, It's the 'old woman' in you that just can't resist the opportunity to go on, and on, about a nothing topic. *All you need, you Old Bitch, is just the least bit of an chance to start up that super charged motor mouth of yours, and spew out from here to eternity! Babble on you crusty old witch!! And just what does your complaining about the thread have to do with FISHING??? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 11:17*pm, ConwayRadis wrote:
WTF *does this irrelevant babbling about felling a MF-Tree have to do with FISHING????? I know, It's the 'old woman' in you that just can't resist the opportunity to go on, and on, about a nothing topic. *All you need, you Old Bitch, is just the least bit of an chance to start up that super charged motor mouth of yours, and spew out from here to eternity! Babble on you crusty old witch!! Some interesting questions and observations there. And I'm sure that we could collectively address them satisfactorily if you would give us an idea of why it hurts so much to be you. I mean, we already know that it's not simply rank stupidity. We see enough of that here just about every day to know that its possessors, though intellectually and morally crippled, nevertheless manage to get through most days without doing themselves any obvious debilitating damage. Not to say that they don't suffer from obvious debilitating damage.....but we rarely see any incremental increase in that damage on any given day. Well, o.k., it isn't exactly "rarely," but you know what I mean. So, what is it? Do you have disgusting habits that you simply cannot give up despite knowing that the world disapproves? Do you have thoughts and desires that would cause family and neighbors to stone you to death if you ever gave vent to them? Is it guilt over heinous acts committed in childhood.....or well into whatever semblance of adulthood an overly generous observer might be willing to ascribe to you? Are you utterly incapable of face to face encounters with human beings? Are you paralyzed by fear at the mere thought of engaging in something as portentous as idle chatter? Are you possessed of a visage that sends women and small children shrieking into the cold dark night? Do you eat boogers? Do you carry your bottle-cap collection in your anus? Give us just a few little hints. We'll see what we can do for you. g. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|