![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/03/2011 1:26 PM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
I like it for the ease of doing things like Dave is going to do, strengthening hackle or herl to make a more resilient fly. Speed is also an issue. Many of the simple tasks are much cleaner and more uniform done on the Nor Vise. In actuality, due to the board setup, I've found that my vise stays put together longer. I tie more flies. Frank Reid I am kind of intrigued by this.....how is it for tying flies with an asymmetric body, such as a pheasant tail nymph, that has a shell back? Tim Lysyk |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/28/2011 11:49 AM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
Frank Reid (stickin' it to the Renzetti snobs every chance he gets) this Renzetti user turned down a Norvise to purchase the Renzetti you have seen so often. Going on 20 years service. The thing is as reliable as LaCourse's waders and smells far better. Tom |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/28/2011 6:55 PM, Tim Lysyk wrote:
I am kind of intrigued by this.....how is it for tying flies with an asymmetric body, such as a pheasant tail nymph, that has a shell back? Tim Lysyk enough of a pain to make you rush out and buy a Renzetti or Danvise, or stick with any of a couple dozen quality stationary vises. Mind you, I am a big fan of rotary tying. It comes in handy for ribbing and hackling even if you aren't tying production, and makes production tying considerably quicker on some types of patterns. Still, I found the Norvise to be far more gimmick than all-around tying tool. YMMV, of course. That Frank swears by it is a plus....it must, at least, be safe to use.g Tom |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-03-28 19:35:20 -0400, Tom Littleton said:
On 3/28/2011 11:49 AM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote: Frank Reid (stickin' it to the Renzetti snobs every chance he gets) this Renzetti user turned down a Norvise to purchase the Renzetti you have seen so often. Going on 20 years service. The thing is as reliable as LaCourse's waders and smells far better. Tom LOL. I've had my Renzetti for about as long as you. I have the left hand model. Peter Charles used it alot when we were at Lakewood. He fell in love with it, and instead of buying the right hand model (he's right handed), he bought the left hand model like mine. Dave |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-03-28 19:35:20 -0400, Tom Littleton said:
On 3/28/2011 11:49 AM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote: Frank Reid (stickin' it to the Renzetti snobs every chance he gets) this Renzetti user turned down a Norvise to purchase the Renzetti you have seen so often. Going on 20 years service. The thing is as reliable as LaCourse's waders and smells far better. Tom Forgot: I have a new set of G3s. I'm still using the old ones down here and will dedicate the new ones to only the Rapid River. Dave |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 28, 5:12*pm, D. LaCourse wrote:
On 2011-03-28 14:57:59 -0400, Frank Reid 2010 said: On Mar 28, 11:03*am, D. LaCourse wrote: On 2011-03-28 11:49:36 -0400, Frank Reid 2010 said: On Mar 27, 4:29*pm, D. LaCourse wrote: I'm tying up some flies and I need a peacock herl rope. *I dislike making my own (spinning/twisting the herl onto either thread or wire). * Someone on this group recently referred to some store-bought peacock rope. *I've googled and can't find it. *Any help would be apprecia ted . Dave If you used a Norvise, you would have the appropriate tool to make this quickly and efficiently instead of spending hours on-line trying to purchase premade. :-) Frank Reid (stickin' it to the Renzetti snobs every chance he gets) d;o) *Have both, Frank. *The Norvise is permanently attached to my fl y tying station, and I use the Renzetti for traveling. *Regardless, I still have to make the rope and I just do not like to do it. *But, just for you, I will acquiesce and try it on the Norvise. *I'll get some new herl too. *The stuff I have looks good, but breaks too often. *Fly tying is supposed to be fun. Dave (Third day stuck on the mountain within the clouds. *It isn't raining in the valley, but there has been a constant mist up here for the past two days. *Neat, really.)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szPTZjmKwpQ Cheers Frank Thanks Frank. *I'm familiar with his videos. *But look at this: http://www.ezflyfish.com/peacherbrus.html Old Wally comes thru again. *It's not only easier, but my language will improve. *d;o) Dave- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Slacker. :-) Frank Reid |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 28, 5:55*pm, Tim Lysyk wrote:
On 28/03/2011 1:26 PM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote: I like it for the ease of doing things like Dave is going to do, strengthening hackle or herl to make a more resilient fly. *Speed is also an issue. *Many of the simple tasks are much cleaner and more uniform done on the Nor Vise. In actuality, due to the board setup, I've found that my vise stays put together longer. *I tie more flies. Frank Reid I am kind of intrigued by this.....how is it for tying *flies with an asymmetric body, such as a pheasant tail nymph, that has a shell back? Tim Lysyk The abdomen is quite easy to do. I've found I can get nice constant tension (and the tension of the rotary is adjustable) when spinning on the pheasant. Alternately, it locks at 90 degree points to work on specific areas. A secondary part is the spring loaded bobbin. After using this (and this is an inherent part of using the Nor Vise) for a bit, you don't really wanna go back to regular. The ability to just let go of the bobbin so it can hang below the fly and also to take up the extra slack by just moving the bobbin toward the fly is a great combination. Frank Reid |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 28, 5:55*pm, Tim Lysyk wrote:
On 28/03/2011 1:26 PM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote: I like it for the ease of doing things like Dave is going to do, strengthening hackle or herl to make a more resilient fly. *Speed is also an issue. *Many of the simple tasks are much cleaner and more uniform done on the Nor Vise. In actuality, due to the board setup, I've found that my vise stays put together longer. *I tie more flies. Frank Reid I am kind of intrigued by this.....how is it for tying *flies with an asymmetric body, such as a pheasant tail nymph, that has a shell back? Tim Lysyk And completely ignore Tom. He is Luddite Renzetti snob that doesn't understand innovation. He would have had Henry Ford make a faster horse. He's been hangin' with the Amish too long. Frank Reid (he still uses bobbers) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/29/2011 9:00 AM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
And completely ignore Tom. He is Luddite Renzetti snob that doesn't understand innovation. He would have had Henry Ford make a faster horse. He's been hangin' with the Amish too long. Frank Reid (he still uses bobbers) I repeat, twenty years back I was offered my choice, essentially for free(shop owed me bucks on a fly order and was cash-short). I tested both for two weeks each, chose the Renzetti, never regretted it. To salve Frank's fragile ego, however, the accompanying bobbin had not been developed to it's current state, so 'perhaps' that would have made a world of difference. I doubt it. The Renzetti does full rotary at a quick clip, can be infinitely adjusted for rotary tension(to the point of non-rotary action, if desired), is indestructable, guaranteed for life(or until the Renzetti family moves out of the country), and can (with a set of 3 jaws) tie anything from a 2/0 down to #28. Tom |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29/03/2011 3:31 PM, Tom Littleton wrote:
On 3/29/2011 9:00 AM, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote: And completely ignore Tom. He is Luddite Renzetti snob that doesn't understand innovation. He would have had Henry Ford make a faster horse. He's been hangin' with the Amish too long. Frank Reid (he still uses bobbers) I repeat, twenty years back I was offered my choice, essentially for free(shop owed me bucks on a fly order and was cash-short). I tested both for two weeks each, chose the Renzetti, never regretted it. To salve Frank's fragile ego, however, the accompanying bobbin had not been developed to it's current state, so 'perhaps' that would have made a world of difference. I doubt it. The Renzetti does full rotary at a quick clip, can be infinitely adjusted for rotary tension(to the point of non-rotary action, if desired), is indestructable, guaranteed for life(or until the Renzetti family moves out of the country), and can (with a set of 3 jaws) tie anything from a 2/0 down to #28. Tom Thanks both for your answers and opinions. I am much less confused now! Tim Lysyk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Peacock Herl | Guy | Fly Fishing Tying | 10 | May 24th, 2011 07:38 PM |
Peacock herl or chenille ? | Ken Fortenberry | Fly Fishing | 6 | July 11th, 2010 02:43 AM |
big peacock bass - 20lb Peacock.jpg | Cam | Fishing Photos | 0 | March 30th, 2008 06:51 PM |
biot and herl | Andy Klinstiver | Fly Fishing Tying | 11 | January 19th, 2004 07:00 PM |
biot and herl | Andy Klinstiver | Fly Fishing Tying | 1 | January 12th, 2004 04:29 AM |