A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Godfather meets the Yellowstone Oil Spill



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 17th, 2011, 05:44 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
ScovilleUnit
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 127
Default The Godfather meets the Yellowstone Oil Spill

Giles wrote in news:44d65d07-b028-40de-96fb-
:

On Jul 15, 5:33*pm, salmobytes wrote:
Exxon was warned by Montana's popular governor as long a two years
ago.


Recent media attention notwithstanding, we, here in cheeselandia, are
fortunate.....we only have one governor at a time....we never have to
worry about whether someone is speaking in reference to the popular
one......or the "other". In any case, what Exxon says to any, all, or
none of them is a complete mystery to me. For good or ill, this
doesn't trouble me all that much.

Others warned too:
"Your pipeline is not deep enough," *Exxon was told.


It warms the heart.....well, THIS heart, anyway.....to learn that
there is a depth sufficient to allay the fears and dreads of
environmental activists with regard to petroleum leakage. See no
evil, know no evil.....ainna?

I don't have a link on the tip of my keyboard.


Hm......

Have you checked ALL of the tips?

But these warnings are
part of the public record.


The public record is a lot like the public library. When's the last
time you were there.....and what did you find that might interest
somebody or other?

Seriously.

It's all been in the local papers recently, a lot...bolstering Brian
Schweitzer's already glowing popularity.


Ooh! I remember him! Didn't he, like, used to play the violin and
touch open sores on Africans and ****?

Exxon did nothing because it turned out there was no for the state to
require a deeper pipeline.


Deeper piplines are for sucking **** OUT.....not for transporting
****.....or for pumping **** IN!.

But they cannot claim surprise.


Good god, what planet did you just arrive from?

They were warned repeatedly.


And?

Long in advance.


So?

It's one thing for an energy company to say "we didn't know."
It's another matter when they were warned about a specific problem, in
a specific way.


Actually, no (and, specifically and most emphatically, "NO!") it is
NOT, and does not in the least even resemble a second cousin of
another matter.

High income individuals and Energy companies have been enjoying
gargantuan tax breaks since George Bush made it happen,


Wrong. Pig-headedly, unforgiveably, unarguably, and easily
demonstrably wrong! High income individuals have been enjoying
gargantuan tax breaks since time immemorial. "Energy companies" is a
sublime joke whose executives wouldn't get it.

and because the hill-billy right has had their hand on the legislative
monkey wrench ever since.


My enemies are amusing (on their good days).....dog save me from my
allies.

Exxon needs to pay handsomely for this. *So does the hill-billy
right. *The lower Yellowstone fishery is not happy right now.


Let it never be said that like minds cannot find common ground. I
agree wholeheartedly. I think every fish that files a complaint
(consistent with current USFWS policies.....states' rights be damned!)
should (upon verification and approval by and/or from whatever
applicable, federal, state, county or municipal ordinanaces and
authoratative bodies) be granted a tax-free stipend (payable
immediately.....upon application and approval by whatever legitimate
authority) of some thousands of bugs.....or some such equivalent ****.

g.
well, THERE!.....THAT! should settle this ****!



I sure hope it settles all that green $#it on your teeth.....GILES!!!


  #2  
Old July 21st, 2011, 03:09 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Giles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,257
Default The Godfather meets the Yellowstone Oil Spill

On Jul 16, 11:44*pm, ScovilleUnit wrote:
Giles wrote in news:44d65d07-b028-40de-96fb-
:





On Jul 15, 5:33*pm, salmobytes wrote:
Exxon was warned by Montana's popular governor as long a two years
ago.


Recent media attention notwithstanding, we, here in cheeselandia, are
fortunate.....we only have one governor at a time....we never have to
worry about whether someone is speaking in reference to the popular
one......or the "other". *In any case, what Exxon says to any, all, or
none of them is a complete mystery to me. *For good or ill, this
doesn't trouble me all that much.


Others warned too:
"Your pipeline is not deep enough," *Exxon was told.


It warms the heart.....well, THIS heart, anyway.....to learn that
there is a depth sufficient to allay the fears and dreads of
environmental activists with regard to petroleum leakage. *See no
evil, know no evil.....ainna?


I don't have a link on the tip of my keyboard.


Hm......


Have you checked ALL of the tips?


But these warnings are
part of the public record.


The public record is a lot like the public library. *When's the last
time you were there.....and what did you find that might interest
somebody or other?


Seriously.


It's all been in the local papers recently, a lot...bolstering Brian
Schweitzer's already glowing popularity.


Ooh! *I remember him! *Didn't he, like, used to play the violin and
touch open sores on Africans and ****?


Exxon did nothing because it turned out there was no for the state to
require a deeper pipeline.


Deeper piplines are for sucking **** OUT.....not for transporting
****.....or for pumping **** IN!.


But they cannot claim surprise.


Good god, what planet did you just arrive from?


They were warned repeatedly.


And?


Long in advance.


So?


It's one thing for an energy company to say "we didn't know."
It's another matter when they were warned about a specific problem, in
a specific way.


Actually, no (and, specifically and most emphatically, "NO!") it is
NOT, and does not in the least even resemble a second cousin of
another matter.


High income individuals and Energy companies have been enjoying
gargantuan tax breaks since George Bush made it happen,


Wrong. *Pig-headedly, unforgiveably, unarguably, and easily
demonstrably wrong! *High income individuals have been enjoying
gargantuan tax breaks since time immemorial. *"Energy companies" is a
sublime joke whose executives wouldn't get it.


and because the hill-billy right has had their hand on the legislative
monkey wrench ever since.


My enemies are amusing (on their good days).....dog save me from my
allies.


Exxon needs to pay handsomely for this. *So does the hill-billy
right. *The lower Yellowstone fishery is not happy right now.


Let it never be said that like minds cannot find common ground. *I
agree wholeheartedly. *I think every fish that files a complaint
(consistent with current USFWS policies.....states' rights be damned!)
should (upon verification and approval by and/or from whatever
applicable, federal, state, county or municipal ordinanaces and
authoratative bodies) be granted a tax-free stipend (payable
immediately.....upon application and approval by whatever legitimate
authority) of some thousands of bugs.....or some such equivalent ****.


g.
well, THERE!.....THAT! should settle this ****!


I sure hope it settles all that green $#it on your teeth.....GILES!!!


moron.

g.
  #3  
Old July 26th, 2011, 03:12 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
ScovilleUnit
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 127
Default The Godfather meets the Yellowstone Oil Spill

Giles wrote in
:

On Jul 16, 11:44*pm, ScovilleUnit wrote:
Giles wrote in news:44d65d07-b028-40de-96fb-
:





On Jul 15, 5:33*pm, salmobytes wrote:
Exxon was warned by Montana's popular governor as long a two years
ago.


Recent media attention notwithstanding, we, here in cheeselandia,
are fortunate.....we only have one governor at a time....we never
have to worry about whether someone is speaking in reference to the
popular one......or the "other". *In any case, what Exxon says to
any, all, o

r
none of them is a complete mystery to me. *For good or ill, this
doesn't trouble me all that much.


Others warned too:
"Your pipeline is not deep enough," *Exxon was told.


It warms the heart.....well, THIS heart, anyway.....to learn that
there is a depth sufficient to allay the fears and dreads of
environmental activists with regard to petroleum leakage. *See no
evil, know no evil.....ainna?


I don't have a link on the tip of my keyboard.


Hm......


Have you checked ALL of the tips?


But these warnings are
part of the public record.


The public record is a lot like the public library. *When's the
last time you were there.....and what did you find that might
interest somebody or other?


Seriously.


It's all been in the local papers recently, a lot...bolstering
Brian Schweitzer's already glowing popularity.


Ooh! *I remember him! *Didn't he, like, used to play the violin and
touch open sores on Africans and ****?


Exxon did nothing because it turned out there was no for the state
to require a deeper pipeline.


Deeper piplines are for sucking **** OUT.....not for transporting
****.....or for pumping **** IN!.


But they cannot claim surprise.


Good god, what planet did you just arrive from?


They were warned repeatedly.


And?


Long in advance.


So?


It's one thing for an energy company to say "we didn't know."
It's another matter when they were warned about a specific
problem, in a specific way.


Actually, no (and, specifically and most emphatically, "NO!") it is
NOT, and does not in the least even resemble a second cousin of
another matter.


High income individuals and Energy companies have been enjoying
gargantuan tax breaks since George Bush made it happen,


Wrong. *Pig-headedly, unforgiveably, unarguably, and easily
demonstrably wrong! *High income individuals have been enjoying
gargantuan tax breaks since time immemorial. *"Energy companies" is
a sublime joke whose executives wouldn't get it.


and because the hill-billy right has had their hand on the
legislative monkey wrench ever since.


My enemies are amusing (on their good days).....dog save me from my
allies.


Exxon needs to pay handsomely for this. *So does the hill-billy
right. *The lower Yellowstone fishery is not happy right now.


Let it never be said that like minds cannot find common ground. *I
agree wholeheartedly. *I think every fish that files a complaint
(consistent with current USFWS policies.....states' rights be
damned!) should (upon verification and approval by and/or from
whatever applicable, federal, state, county or municipal
ordinanaces and authoratative bodies) be granted a tax-free stipend
(payable immediately.....upon application and approval by whatever
legitimate authority) of some thousands of bugs.....or some such
equivalent ****.


g.
well, THERE!.....THAT! should settle this ****!


I sure hope it settles all that green $#it on your teeth.....GILES!!!


moron.

g.


LOL

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yellowstone Oil Spill Tom Littleton Fly Fishing 34 July 12th, 2011 12:57 AM
Godfather Part Masters Ken Fortenberry Fly Fishing 5 April 15th, 2010 02:04 AM
Kayak fisherman meets shark Bill Kiene Fly Fishing 0 July 26th, 2007 05:00 PM
Rube meets pontoon - first trip Flyfish Fly Fishing 11 May 30th, 2004 10:15 PM
Rube meets pontoon - tr tomorrow Flyfish Fly Fishing 2 May 15th, 2004 12:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.