The politics of nature

Stev notes:
In this situation, I tend to believe the Army's
story.

yeah, after that whopper they cooked up for the Jessica Lynch saga, could they
have that much bull**** left in them?
Tom

yeah, after that whopper they cooked up for the Jessica Lynch saga, could
they
have that much bull**** left in them?
Tom

On that matter, Tom, I agree with you. I'm sorry she was injured. I'm also
sorry that someone chose to hype the incident.

But it doesn't shake my faith in all military sources. PR people are the
same whether they wear a uniform or a suit.


--
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm

"slenon" wrote in message
om...
yeah, after that whopper they cooked up for the Jessica Lynch saga,
could
they
have that much bull**** left in them?
Tom

On that matter, Tom, I agree with you. I'm sorry she was injured. I'm
also
sorry that someone chose to hype the incident.

But it doesn't shake my faith in all military sources. PR people are the
same whether they wear a uniform or a suit.

Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction is
valid.....or important.

"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bstjvr$1745t$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:

Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction is
valid.....or important.





Who do you think is generating the agenda for the guys in the uniforms?

Scott

"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bstjvr$1745t$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:

Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer
children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction
is
valid.....or important.





Who do you think is generating the agenda for the guys in the
uniforms?

Um.......hm.......o.k., I give up.

Wolfgang
who, having pondered this very question for ever so long, hopes that
it wasn't merely rhetorical.

"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bsul9d$1fg14$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:


"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bstjvr$1745t$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:

Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer
children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction
is
valid.....or important.





Who do you think is generating the agenda for the guys in the
uniforms?

Um.......hm.......o.k., I give up.

Wolfgang
who, having pondered this very question for ever so long, hopes that
it wasn't merely rhetorical.




It's the guys in the suits, of course (or at least some of them). Another
possibility would be the original cast of "Soap".

Scott

"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bsul9d$1fg14$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:


"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bstjvr$1745t$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:

Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer
children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the
distinction
is
valid.....or important.





Who do you think is generating the agenda for the guys in the
uniforms?

Um.......hm.......o.k., I give up.

Wolfgang
who, having pondered this very question for ever so long, hopes
that
it wasn't merely rhetorical.




It's the guys in the suits, of course (or at least some of them).

See, that's what I love about this place. Stick around long enough
and all of life's persisteht nagging questions will be answered.
Who'da thunk it?

Another
possibility would be the original cast of "Soap".

And the difference is.....?

Wolfgang

Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction is
valid.....or important.

If we allow suits to include local business attire and customary dress, the
ones in suits are all too often the ones who start the process of war. I
have a greater appreciation of your position than you believe. And I do
acknowledge the validity and importance of the distinction.

--
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm

"slenon" wrote in message
m...
Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction is
valid.....or important.

If we allow suits to include local business attire and customary dress, the
ones in suits are all too often the ones who start the process of war. I
have a greater appreciation of your position than you believe. And I do
acknowledge the validity and importance of the distinction.

Good post. Many would agree. ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
(It's a casual day at work today, so no murderous suits are in sight.)
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

Greg Pavlov writes:

The people who are most responsible for
Bush's victory are Bush and Clinton. Bush,
because he made the right moves, and Clinton
because his personal behavior tainted Gore
and made it difficult for Gore to build off
his vice presidency or to involve Clinton
in the campaign.

Which boils down to Gore ran a terrible campaign. He came off second best in
the debates, and his "re-inventing" himself made him look like a dork.
Historically, he should have won the election, being the Veep of a successful
administration. But, he blew it.
Dave

http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/myhomepage/index.html