![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "slenon" wrote in message m... Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer children. Wolfgang and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction is valid.....or important. If we allow suits to include local business attire and customary dress, the ones in suits are all too often the ones who start the process of war. I have a greater appreciation of your position than you believe. And I do acknowledge the validity and importance of the distinction. Good post. Many would agree. ;-) -- TL, Tim (It's a casual day at work today, so no murderous suits are in sight.) ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Pavlov writes:
The people who are most responsible for Bush's victory are Bush and Clinton. Bush, because he made the right moves, and Clinton because his personal behavior tainted Gore and made it difficult for Gore to build off his vice presidency or to involve Clinton in the campaign. Which boils down to Gore ran a terrible campaign. He came off second best in the debates, and his "re-inventing" himself made him look like a dork. Historically, he should have won the election, being the Veep of a successful administration. But, he blew it. Dave http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/myhomepage/index.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT Politics | Mike Connor | Fly Fishing | 103 | December 29th, 2003 09:56 PM |