The politics of nature

On 2 Jan 2004 03:10:01 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:


"Chris HIll" wrote in message
...
Typical lying from the looney left. Just like all these wannabe political

SNIPPED typical lying from the jackoff, child-molesting, nun-raping, idiot
electing, ill-numerate, snot swallowing, bugger picking, pig marrying, slime
sucking, communist peckerwood biting, seat peeing, whiners of the bed
wetting, dog kicking, Nazi purse snatching, drug addict right wing, 90 pound
weakling, Rush dittohead faction of sewer rat, lay about, ****ants.

Chris, your problem is you don't love love the Constitution.

Dave


The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.

Strider

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 04:41:49 GMT, Strider wrote:

On 2 Jan 2004 03:10:01 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:


"Chris HIll" wrote in message
...
Typical lying from the looney left. Just like all these wannabe political

SNIPPED typical lying from the jackoff, child-molesting, nun-raping, idiot
electing, ill-numerate, snot swallowing, bugger picking, pig marrying, slime
sucking, communist peckerwood biting, seat peeing, whiners of the bed
wetting, dog kicking, Nazi purse snatching, drug addict right wing, 90 pound
weakling, Rush dittohead faction of sewer rat, lay about, ****ants.

Chris, your problem is you don't love love the Constitution.

Dave


The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.

Why do you hate America?

/daytripper (go ahead, make a list)

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 05:00:24 GMT, daytripper
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 04:41:49 GMT, Strider wrote:

On 2 Jan 2004 03:10:01 GMT, "David Snedeker"
wrote:


"Chris HIll" wrote in message
...
Typical lying from the looney left. Just like all these wannabe political

SNIPPED typical lying from the jackoff, child-molesting, nun-raping, idiot
electing, ill-numerate, snot swallowing, bugger picking, pig marrying, slime
sucking, communist peckerwood biting, seat peeing, whiners of the bed
wetting, dog kicking, Nazi purse snatching, drug addict right wing, 90 pound
weakling, Rush dittohead faction of sewer rat, lay about, ****ants.

Chris, your problem is you don't love love the Constitution.

Dave


The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.

Why do you hate America?

/daytripper (go ahead, make a list)

When are you going to stop beating your wife?

Strider

"daytripper" wrote
Strider wrote:
The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.

Why do you hate America?

What exactly does that question mean?
Are you asking him:
Does he hate the *word* America?
Does he hate the *people* that live in America?
Does he hate the *politicians* in America?
Does he hate the *land* in America?

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 03:57:58 GMT, "Don" wrote:

"daytripper" wrote
Strider wrote:
The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.

Why do you hate America?

What exactly does that question mean?
Are you asking him:
Does he hate the *word* America?
Does he hate the *people* that live in America?
Does he hate the *politicians* in America?
Does he hate the *land* in America?

Hey - you're right! He be hatin' on MANY levels!

/daytripper (And you spent more time on that than he did, guaranteed ;-)

"daytripper" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 03:57:58 GMT, "Don"
wrote:

"daytripper" wrote
Strider wrote:
The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.

Why do you hate America?

What exactly does that question mean?
Are you asking him:
Does he hate the *word* America?
Does he hate the *people* that live in America?
Does he hate the *politicians* in America?
Does he hate the *land* in America?

Hey - you're right! He be hatin' on MANY levels!

/daytripper (And you spent more time on that than he did, guaranteed ;-)

Well, I hear many people saying that all the time anymore, I'm just
wondering what they mean. Or do they even know what they're talking about?

On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:39:59 GMT, "Don" wrote:


"daytripper" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 03:57:58 GMT, "Don"
wrote:

"daytripper" wrote
Strider wrote:
The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.

Why do you hate America?

What exactly does that question mean?
Are you asking him:
Does he hate the *word* America?
Does he hate the *people* that live in America?
Does he hate the *politicians* in America?
Does he hate the *land* in America?

Hey - you're right! He be hatin' on MANY levels!

/daytripper (And you spent more time on that than he did, guaranteed ;-)

Well, I hear many people saying that all the time anymore, I'm just
wondering what they mean. Or do they even know what they're talking about?

Ah - sorry, didn't recognize that I didn't recognize the handle.

The short answer is: that expression used to be used as an inside joke, here.

/daytripper (now, it's pretty much lost its luster...)

Strider wrote:

The Constitution would work just fine if it weren't for a bunch of
tofu sucking Liberals trying to "redefine" it every other week.


ok, finally, it appears i have found someone who can provide details...
i think i understand the tofu-sucking part... i've not ever seen tofu to
my knowledge, nor seen anyone suck it, but i suspect it would be
something i could recognize. anyway, what's the definition you believe
accurately identifies a "liberal"?... and can you identify those *******
"liberals" you claim are engaged in redefining the Constitution? thanks!!

jeff (poltically struggling with all such stuff ever since atomic-based
Coordinated Universal Time was implemented in 1972, superseding the
astronomically determined Greenwich Mean Time.)

jeff (poltically struggling with all such stuff ever since atomic-based
Coordinated Universal Time was implemented in 1972, superseding the
astronomically determined Greenwich Mean Time.)

In that case, how 'bout "leap second sucking conservatives?" I mean, we
need some consistency here. Since 1999, we've lost the leap second.
Hmmm, conservatives rise to power, leap second disappears.
Coincidence? I don't think so. I think the neo-cons are cooking the
atomic clock in their favor. They don't want the tofu-sucking liberals
to have one more second to prove the conspiracy theories right.
Frank Reid (who's seen a tofu in his cross hairs but could kill
something that ugly)

Frank Reid (who's seen a tofu in his cross hairs but COULDN'T kill
something that ugly)