OT Patriotic Ad

One of the 15 finalists in the Bush in 30 seconds campaign.
Posted here in "honor" of Ernie and Louie.

http://www.bushin30seconds.org/view/05_small.shtml

--
Ken Fortenberry

"B J Conner" wrote in message
Just to **** you off even more. It's more that oil, remember Brown and
Root
are running the mess halls and these crooks are selling lots of trucks.

Nah, I got it out of my system for a while. Let somebody else get ****ed
off next time. I'm having a couple fingers of Balvenie instead. Probably
shoulda done that first.

Joe F.

"rb608" wrote in message
...
I'm having a couple fingers of Balvenie instead. Probably
shoulda done that first.

Joe F.



Hear, hear!

lid wrote...
One of the 15 finalists in the Bush in 30 seconds campaign.
Posted here in "honor" of Ernie and Louie.

http://www.bushin30seconds.org/view/05_small.shtml

Here's another interesting little story:
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2004/janu...ames_rnc.shtml
--
Warren
(use troutbum_mt (at) yahoo to reply via email)
For Conclave Info:
http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt...nConclave.html

"Warren" wrote in message Here's another interesting
little story:
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2004/janu...ames_rnc.shtml

That is interesting. My local network affiliate ran a story on the "Hitler"
ads yesterday a.m. Lots of coverage of the negative aspects, hardly a word
about the BushIn30Seconds effort, and what was mentioned wasn't examined in
any depth or favorably. Liberal press I suppose.

If I could vote for the winner, though, I'd go with the "In My Country"
spot.

Joe F.

Warren wrote:

Here's another interesting little story:
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2004/janu...ames_rnc.shtml

The "Hitler Ads" were not created by MoveOn.org but they weren't
censored either. Folks had a chance to vote on independently
created 30 second ads and the two "Hitler Ads" lost out. The
ONLY place you can see those ads now is on the website of the
Republican National Committee.

It really is misleading to compare Shrub with Hitler, after all
Hitler was democratically elected. ;-)

Disclaimer: This post was not approved by Über Colonel Epps, the
only man in America with the sagacity, experience and encyclopedic
knowledge to think critically.

--
Ken Fortenberry

lid wrote...
Warren wrote:
=20
Here's another interesting little story:
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2004/janu...ames_rnc.shtml
=20
The "Hitler Ads" were not created by MoveOn.org but they weren't
censored either. Folks had a chance to vote on independently
created 30 second ads and the two "Hitler Ads" lost out. The
ONLY place you can see those ads now is on the website of the
Republican National Committee.

I saw them on MoveOn.org. They must have just recently removed them=20
due to the harm they are doing to the Democrat Presidential=20
candidates. Nothing like taking one from....errr, for the team!=20
BSEG
=20
It really is misleading to compare Shrub with Hitler, after all
Hitler was democratically elected. ;-)

Whereas Bush was LEGALLY chosen after an election. G =20
=20
Disclaimer: This post was not approved by =DCber Colonel Epps, the
only man in America with the sagacity, experience and encyclopedic
knowledge to think critically.

Actually Ken, I concur with quite a bit of what he said but for=20
different reasons. You should try to really examine things instead=20
of being a preprogrammed liberal bot like Muskie and disclaiming an=20
argument just on the basis that it goes against the propaganda that=20
you have been spoon fed for so many years or because someone from the=20
military said it. I got tired of reading your endless political=20
drivel and resorted to posting equally nutty drivel of the opposing=20
wing nut variety as a sort of payback. =20

Even though the cause was good (hopefully ****ing you off, disgusting=20
you, making your liberal knee jerk, etc), it left me feeling slimy=20
after just reading some of the crap that I turned up and I couldn't=20
even bring myself to post the links. There are some truly whacky=20
people out there and I have never been as grateful for people with=20
differing (even just as nutty) opinions as I am now. It was rather=20
entertaining watching the reactions of the links I did post IMO;=20
watching JoeF go off (you usually aren't one to go off) and Wolfgang=20
flipping out (expected nothing less) had me in stitches. Don't worry=20
Joe, I didn't take it personal at all. I never expressed an opinion=20
on the subject and just posted a link so had nothing to get angry=20
about.=20

So Ken, I have a challenge for you. Should you accept, I will give=20
you my opinion on the current situation and we can compare thoughts,=20
ideas and opinions. I doubt you will agree with *anything* I say,=20
okay I know you won't, and doubt you will even accept this challenge. =20
I am hoping you accept because I am very curious as to what leads you=20
to believe in your positions. I want it from you first hand instead=20
of more crap from your liberal brain trust. As George used to say,=20
"No more blue thingies!" This is a battle of ideas and not us=20
personally so please try to limit your automatic fall back position=20
of attacking the messenger instead of the message once we start. So,=20
do you wanna dance? Okay, you can get the personal attacks before we=20
start since you owe me a few for this post. ;-)

Now back to my search for more rightnut links. I had to create a new=20
email account just so I could get on the mailing list for some of=20
these whacko sites. ROFF will no longer be a one-sided OT political=20
posting usenet group! Remember, ROFF is like a bar and you may meet=20
one of these whackos someday so their opposing nutty views belong=20
here as well. If that theory doesn't work, try the "ROFF is=20
Darwinian" one! :-)
--=20
Warren
(use troutbum_mt (at) yahoo to reply via email)
For Conclave Info:
http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt...nConclave.html

Warren wrote:
lid wrote...

Disclaimer: This post was not approved by Über Colonel Epps, the
only man in America with the sagacity, experience and encyclopedic
knowledge to think critically.

Actually Ken, I concur with quite a bit of what he said but for
different reasons.

I agree with some of what he said, but he's a pompous jackass if
he believes he's the only person here whose opinions are informed
by reading widely from different perspectives and critical thinking.

You should try to really examine things instead
of being a preprogrammed liberal bot like Muskie and disclaiming an
argument just on the basis that it goes against the propaganda that
you have been spoon fed for so many years or because someone from the
military said it.

And you sir, are a pompous jackass.

I got tired of reading your endless political
drivel and resorted to posting equally nutty drivel of the opposing
wing nut variety as a sort of payback. ...

It was rather
entertaining watching the reactions of the links I did post IMO;
watching JoeF go off (you usually aren't one to go off) and Wolfgang
flipping out (expected nothing less) had me in stitches. ...

A troll, in other words.

So Ken, I have a challenge for you. Should you accept, I will give
you my opinion on the current situation and we can compare thoughts,
ideas and opinions.

No thanks. When I post an opinion here it is my opinion. I don't post
inflammatory propaganda just to feel smug and superior while watching
other people react to the troll. I don't care to converse with admitted
trolls whose first reaction to an honest opinion is "you don't think
for yourself, you're just parroting liberal bias". Why don't you talk
current events with Über Colonel Epps, you two deserve each other.

--
Ken Fortenberry

lid wrote...
I agree with some of what he said, but he's a pompous jackass if
he believes he's the only person here whose opinions are informed
by reading widely from different perspectives and critical thinking.

And that makes you a ______ come Ken, you can do it. I know you have=20
it in you.

Jackass....
=20
And you sir, are a pompous jackass. =20

LOL! That's rich! I am so pompous that I wanted to understand your=20
position. That's just too funny! This coming from the guy who=20
argues about what a true dip****ta or whatever the hell you call it=20
is because he is some sort of gourmet expert? The same guy that=20
thinks his culinary talents are far greater than anybody else here on=20
ROFF? Hey, what's in your gumbo again there Sparky? The guy who=20
thinks his service as a liberal ideologue and who cannot post=20
anything other political attack ads is more valuable than someone who=20
served in the military? The same guy who flames everybody he=20
disagrees with? Don't even get me started on the whole Yellowstone=20
Kenny thing either.....
=20
A troll, in other words.

No, it was a Fortenberry. That's what we call political posts that=20
the poster knows will **** off others but keeps posting them again,=20
again, again and yet again. =20
=20
No thanks. When I post an opinion here it is my opinion. I don't post
inflammatory propaganda just to feel smug and superior while watching
other people react to the troll.=20

I can't wait to see some of your opinions Muskie, I mean Ken. I=20
don't recall you expressing any opinions in the post other than your=20
ritual name calling of those who you disagree with. =20

Your first post in this thread consisted of:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2F351507

I'm not making this **** up. You posted the above, that is YOUR post=20
that started the whole thread; which apparently was posting=20
inflammatory propaganda for reasons that aren't "*just* to feel smug=20
and superior while watching other people react to the troll" =20
(emphasis: mine). Yeah, your other motives were to impugn Dave and=20
Ernie as if you are so much better than they are. Or whatever=20
reasons you use to justify your trolls. They really don't matter much=20
and I am just glad that you finally admitted that there were trolls. =20
Oh wait, but they were more than just that. Damn, you are always one=20
step ahead of us! You are just too fool, I mean cool......

I don't care to converse with admitted
trolls whose first reaction to an honest opinion is "you don't think
for yourself, you're just parroting liberal bias". Why don't you talk
current events with =DCber Colonel Epps, you two deserve each other.

I knew you wouldn't want to "converse" without your links. How do=20
you consider posting links "conversing" anyway? You have no interest=20
in talking about issues. All you try to do is ramrod your=20
"opinion," bias, bull**** and political mantra down everybody else's=20
throat for your own personal amusement.

I knew you wouldn't want to talk issues, because you have no original=20
thought and cannot think on your own. Your a ****ing puppet and your=20
"views" are so full of ****, that you won't even address issues=20
because they lack factual basis. Plain and simple, you couldn't hang=20
in an intellectual debate because you are, like a favorite fly of=20
mine, "challenged." As I have no further use for you, I am letting=20
your join your good buddies Wolfgang and Muskie in the Bozo Bin. Oh=20
crap! I just made an internet booboo! I told the idiots that they=20
were in my kill file! Oh ****, you better take that "usenet protocol=20
book," your bottle of "Two Buck Chuck" and shove them up your ASS! =20

The good news is that you are still welcome to come out fishing. I=20
don't have any animosity towards you in real life, just your ROFFian=20
persona and braggadocio.

PLONK!

To the rest of ROFF, I will hereby desist in posting Fortenberries. =20
--=20
Warren
(use troutbum_mt (at) yahoo to reply via email)
For Conclave Info:
http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt...nConclave.html

Warren wrote:
...
The good news is that you are still welcome to come out fishing.

Good news indeed, my friend.

There's nobody I'd rather outfish than you. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry