benefits of antron?

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:55:23 -0800, Svend Tang-Petersen
wrote:

Wayne Knight wrote:

"Stan Gula" wrote in message
...
"Peter Charles" wrote in message
Polypro doesn't absorb water (in my experience). A friend has turned me
on
to turkey flats for posts and while those do suck up water, I've found
it's
not a problem if you give the post a good shot of head cement and grease
it
up.

The best in terms of floatation might be a thin strip of 2mm closed cell
foam. I've experimented with two strips (orange and white) which is
really
easy to see. This gives me a good idea for a swap fly...


Polypro, closed cell foam.....sheesh don't you guys ever tie a parachute fly
the way God intended, good old fashioned animal hair?

Calfs tail works pretty well, but I guess people are getting to lay to stack
hairs. I use most
methods mentioned but most of the time its either polypro or t-base depending
on size and
how slim I want the body.


I used to use calftail on some of my earliest parachute ties but I
went away from it as I thought it too heavy for posts -- that and the
bulk. Did you find that your calftail equipped flies rode OK? Also,
did you stack and tie in, leaving the post untrimmed, or trim it off
square?

Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

"Peter Charles" wrote in message
...
I used to use calftail on some of my earliest parachute ties but I
went away from it as I thought it too heavy for posts -- that and the
bulk. Did you find that your calftail equipped flies rode OK? Also,
did you stack and tie in, leaving the post untrimmed, or trim it off
square?


Rode fine, clip it off square

I stack the hair first, but it takes longer than deer hair since its lighter and less
straight. I rarely trimm
the post, except for lifting the excess at a 45 degree angle and the cutting parallel
with the shank. That
leaves a the excess on the shank tapered. Sometimes (especially if its a biot body) Ill
add some dugging
to smoothen out the body taper.

But as someone mentioned if I want a really thin body I dont use hair.

And I havent noticed any significant differences in flotation etc.

Peter Charles wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:55:23 -0800, Svend Tang-Petersen
wrote:

Wayne Knight wrote:

"Stan Gula" wrote in message
...
"Peter Charles" wrote in message
Polypro doesn't absorb water (in my experience). A friend has turned me
on
to turkey flats for posts and while those do suck up water, I've found
it's
not a problem if you give the post a good shot of head cement and grease
it
up.

The best in terms of floatation might be a thin strip of 2mm closed cell
foam. I've experimented with two strips (orange and white) which is
really
easy to see. This gives me a good idea for a swap fly...


Polypro, closed cell foam.....sheesh don't you guys ever tie a parachute fly
the way God intended, good old fashioned animal hair?

Calfs tail works pretty well, but I guess people are getting to lay to stack
hairs. I use most
methods mentioned but most of the time its either polypro or t-base depending
on size and
how slim I want the body.

I used to use calftail on some of my earliest parachute ties but I
went away from it as I thought it too heavy for posts -- that and the
bulk. Did you find that your calftail equipped flies rode OK? Also,
did you stack and tie in, leaving the post untrimmed, or trim it off
square?

Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

--

Svend

************************************************** ***************
Svend Tang-Petersen, MSc Email: svend AT sgi.com
SGI Pager: svend_p AT pager.sgi.com
1500 Crittenden Lane Phone: (+1) 650 933 3618
Mountain View
California 94043
USA
MS 30-2-526
************************************************** ***************