A most spectacular event

Charlie Choc wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 08:37:07 -0500, Jeff Miller
wrote:



rb608 wrote:



That's one drawback I've found with the flood of point & shoot digital
cameras. No shutter adjustment for time exposures.

olympus stylus 300 or 400 - try one.

Good time exposures of the moon are difficult - usually if they are
long enough to get good detail you will see the movement of the moon.
FWIW
--
Charlie...

assuming a film speed of asa200 (typical color film), the proper
exposure
for an image of the full moon on a clear night would be 1/60sec at f4, give
or
take an f stop. of course, you could open up to f2.8 and select 1/125sec
for your
shutter speed, which would make for a crisp image even if hand held. the
only
thing produced by *longer* exposure times, such as several seconds, with a
tripod, would be an appearance of daylight.

yfitons
wayno (and, sure enough, it works with digital as well... )

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:41:21 -0500, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:

wayno (and, sure enough, it works with digital as well... )

You're right, I was thinking of moonlit landscapes - I bow to your
superior knowledge of actually shooting the moon. g
--
Charlie...