![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:19:17 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote:
"Lazarus Cooke" wrote in message news:020320042219395749%lazarus@stonecurlewfilms. com... In article , riverman wrote: Anyone want to sponsor me in a lawsuit, I'll split it 50-50. If this advertising isn't negligent, not much is. I'm shocked. "Wicked" is the word - in the old sense. Really, really bad. With all due commiseration for Myron's loss, it is hard for me to understand how any normal adult can be unaware of the inherent danger in standing up in small watercraft, regardless of what a manufacturer may claim for a product. It is particularly difficult for me to grasp why anyone who is afraid of water (and thus, presumably, a poor swimmer at best) would do so without a PFD. I don't doubt that some sort of legal action might be undertaken successfully against the manufacturers and/or whoever else may be responsible for portraying such an activity as being safe. Frankly, I don't have much of a problem with it either. But it does raise some interesting ethical and common sense issues. Just how much responsibility should manufacturers or promoters of products and activities that are inherently unsafe, to one degree or another, assume? Does anyone really believe that adults need to be warned about the risks associated with sky diving, smoking, hot coffee, pyrotechnics, running across flaming coals, wading in streams, guns, electricity, hypothermia, or a virtually endless list of other hazards? Well, yes, of course they do. And they are right.....to a certain extent. Some dangers are not so obvious. Others are unmistakable. In fact, most of the things that kill people or cause grievous bodily harm are not mysterious secrets. If anyone can find a way to suck a few million dollars out of McDonalds, Microsoft, GE, Phillip Morris, GM, etc., I say more power to 'em. It appears that the majority of Americans agree with this stance, and there can be no doubt that many a jury has. But no one should labor under the misapprehension that winning a damage award necessarily validates a specific grievance from a moral point of view. Wolfgang The last product I designed has a 3v coin cell battery, about the size of a stack of three US quarters. We had to put a label over the battery with the international "do not eat this" pictograph - otherwise we had to include the moral equivalent of an EIS in 16 different languages... /daytripper (pre-emptive engineering: it ain't all skittles and beer ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "daytripper" wrote in message ... /daytripper (pre-emptive engineering: it ain't all skittles and beer ;-) WARNING!: Skittles and beer have been shown to be deleterious to laboratory animals. Wolfgang and they ain't atkins friendly, neither. ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:36:37 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote:
"daytripper" wrote in message .. . /daytripper (pre-emptive engineering: it ain't all skittles and beer ;-) WARNING!: Skittles and beer have been shown to be deleterious to laboratory animals. Wolfgang and they ain't atkins friendly, neither. ![]() Well, of course! A bunch of soused lab rats that can't reset the pins are likely to get all surly, start gnawing on staff and have to be put down... /daytripper (happens all the time ;-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "daytripper" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:36:37 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote: "daytripper" wrote in message .. . /daytripper (pre-emptive engineering: it ain't all skittles and beer ;-) WARNING!: Skittles and beer have been shown to be deleterious to laboratory animals. Wolfgang and they ain't atkins friendly, neither. ![]() Well, of course! A bunch of soused lab rats that can't reset the pins are likely to get all surly, It ain't so much the intoxication as it is the morning after.......surly?......sheesh! ![]() start gnawing on staff and have to be put down... I guillotined six of 'em this afternoon. /daytripper (happens all the time ;-) Well, actually, about once a week, on average. ![]() Wolfgang long about the time ya yank the brain out, it's pretty obvious who gets the best laugh. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use to take care of some Charles River rats. They were second generation
cesarian delivered rats, After the first experiment they were to be disposed of. Some we took to a snake farm where they made treats for rattle snakes the size of stove pipes. We tested several batches to find out if rats can swim without there wiskers, Have you ever tried it?? "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "daytripper" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:36:37 -0600, "Wolfgang" wrote: "daytripper" wrote in message .. . /daytripper (pre-emptive engineering: it ain't all skittles and beer ;-) WARNING!: Skittles and beer have been shown to be deleterious to laboratory animals. Wolfgang and they ain't atkins friendly, neither. ![]() Well, of course! A bunch of soused lab rats that can't reset the pins are likely to get all surly, It ain't so much the intoxication as it is the morning after.......surly?......sheesh! ![]() start gnawing on staff and have to be put down... I guillotined six of 'em this afternoon. /daytripper (happens all the time ;-) Well, actually, about once a week, on average. ![]() Wolfgang long about the time ya yank the brain out, it's pretty obvious who gets the best laugh. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B J Conner" wrote in message ... I use to take care of some Charles River rats. They were second generation cesarian delivered rats, After the first experiment they were to be disposed of. Some we took to a snake farm where they made treats for rattle snakes the size of stove pipes. We tested several batches to find out if rats can swim without there wiskers, Have you ever tried it?? Nope. Why were you interested in whether or not they could swim without their whiskers? Wolfgang |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Worked with a couple of PHDs psychologist ( check the spelling on
that) that said they could not. It turned out to be true. The rats need the whiskers to know where there nose is. If they don't know it goes under water more and they drown. These were big fat dumb white rats, never had the chance to test it on whild rats. "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "B J Conner" wrote in message ... I use to take care of some Charles River rats. They were second generation cesarian delivered rats, After the first experiment they were to be disposed of. Some we took to a snake farm where they made treats for rattle snakes the size of stove pipes. We tested several batches to find out if rats can swim without there wiskers, Have you ever tried it?? Nope. Why were you interested in whether or not they could swim without their whiskers? Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The tackle is packed.. sort of | alwayfishking | Bass Fishing | 16 | March 27th, 2004 11:22 AM |
Opinions wanted on fishing kayaks | Mark Tinsky | Fly Fishing | 10 | February 21st, 2004 07:21 PM |
World Series (sort of OT) | riverman | Fly Fishing | 6 | October 13th, 2003 12:51 AM |