![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All,
There is a dramatic difference between fly line finishes. I have sold them all sense 1965 and have cast them all too. There are tons of real old technology lines out there for the low price point market that feel like sand paper when you cast them. We are always looking for the best value for the dollar. Fly lines like the old SA 'Aircel' and Cortland '333' are 1950s technology. You have to get to a certain level to get into the newer smoother finish lines that are not going to negatively effect your casting. We found that the Cortland '444' peach colored line (1964) has been the turning point for many years. Another newer line that is great for beginners in the SA/Master 'Head Start' (~year 2000) because it has the new 'AST' finish. We are talking $40 and up to get something that is real smooth and will cast very near like the best. The best lines in the world now are only $60USD so I don't know why anyone would not get the best? The best rods are $700 so that is understandable why most won't go there. For many years the common advise to put the most money towards a good fly line, secondly the rod and lastly the reel. -- Bill Kiene Kiene's Fly Shop Sacramento, CA, USA Web site: www.kiene.com "Sierra fisher" wrote in message ... Your logic is good. The advantage of a weight foreward is that you can cast it further when you learn how to shoot line, and you can carry more backing. the latter is not a consideration if you have a larger reel to start with. Eventually you may find some discomfort with the size of the reel, and you may want to get one that would better balnace the reel as Sven suggested. If you're just getting started, I would worry to much about that yet. (unless money is no object) Which band and which model? A good a starting line is the Sci. Angler 333 available (or was) at Walmart for less than $30 If money is no object, most of the lines are good. The only line I don't like is the clear Cortland 555..too much memory! "Dan" wrote in message ... I want to start fly fishing and have rod (5 wt) and reel (7wt). I will buy a 5 wt floating line since this has recommended for me, but am wondering whether a weight forward or double taper would be appropriate. I see the advantage of the DT is that you get twice the use because you can reverse it eventually. I would also think that since my reel is a bit large for my rod/line weight that a double taper might be appropriate. Do you guys think it would be a good idea or should I just get a weight forward line? Also, does it matter which exactly one I get? I have been told to get the best or close to it. Do you have any specific recommendations as to brand? TIA Dan --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.602 / Virus Database: 383 - Release Date: 3/2/2004 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I would second Bill K's advice about the cost - you can buy an SA or Cortland and have a good quality line for less than $50-$60. I would say that the weight forward is MUCH easier to cast for a beginner, as the Double Taper does not put as much weight up front, and you will notice the difference in your casting, which at first will be 40 feet and under- this will be much easier with a WF line. The advantage of a double taper (reversing it) is really kind of silly - by the time the front wears out, do you think the rest of the line is still unblemished? A damaged line is a damaged line. The real advantage to a DT is that because it has less weight up front you can make more delicate (read - less splashy) casts when presenting dries at a distance. You won't be doing that for the first year or two probably, so go with the WF and have some fun! Bill http://www.tightlines.ca "Bill Kiene" wrote in message m... Hi All, There is a dramatic difference between fly line finishes. I have sold them all sense 1965 and have cast them all too. There are tons of real old technology lines out there for the low price point market that feel like sand paper when you cast them. We are always looking for the best value for the dollar. Fly lines like the old SA 'Aircel' and Cortland '333' are 1950s technology. You have to get to a certain level to get into the newer smoother finish lines that are not going to negatively effect your casting. We found that the Cortland '444' peach colored line (1964) has been the turning point for many years. Another newer line that is great for beginners in the SA/Master 'Head Start' (~year 2000) because it has the new 'AST' finish. We are talking $40 and up to get something that is real smooth and will cast very near like the best. The best lines in the world now are only $60USD so I don't know why anyone would not get the best? The best rods are $700 so that is understandable why most won't go there. For many years the common advise to put the most money towards a good fly line, secondly the rod and lastly the reel. -- Bill Kiene Kiene's Fly Shop Sacramento, CA, USA Web site: www.kiene.com "Sierra fisher" wrote in message ... Your logic is good. The advantage of a weight foreward is that you can cast it further when you learn how to shoot line, and you can carry more backing. the latter is not a consideration if you have a larger reel to start with. Eventually you may find some discomfort with the size of the reel, and you may want to get one that would better balnace the reel as Sven suggested. If you're just getting started, I would worry to much about that yet. (unless money is no object) Which band and which model? A good a starting line is the Sci. Angler 333 available (or was) at Walmart for less than $30 If money is no object, most of the lines are good. The only line I don't like is the clear Cortland 555..too much memory! "Dan" wrote in message ... I want to start fly fishing and have rod (5 wt) and reel (7wt). I will buy a 5 wt floating line since this has recommended for me, but am wondering whether a weight forward or double taper would be appropriate. I see the advantage of the DT is that you get twice the use because you can reverse it eventually. I would also think that since my reel is a bit large for my rod/line weight that a double taper might be appropriate. Do you guys think it would be a good idea or should I just get a weight forward line? Also, does it matter which exactly one I get? I have been told to get the best or close to it. Do you have any specific recommendations as to brand? TIA Dan --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.602 / Virus Database: 383 - Release Date: 3/2/2004 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reel fishermen | allen | General Discussion | 1 | April 17th, 2004 05:04 AM |
Backing advice | Aaron Hammer | Fly Fishing | 13 | January 30th, 2004 03:45 AM |
Line Snobs | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 15 | January 3rd, 2004 02:49 PM |
Good deal on great line! | schreecher | Bass Fishing | 0 | November 25th, 2003 05:08 AM |
PowerPro line | Eric | Bass Fishing | 2 | September 23rd, 2003 06:10 PM |