![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Willi - that is what I said - casts at 40 feet for the beginning. It is as he stretches out to 50 and 60 feet that it is much easier with a WF, and very difficult with a DT, for a beginner. Going on the theory that the line will wear out in a few seasons, it is at that point that casting acumen may call for a DT. My main point is that the bit about being able to reverse a DT line is hooey. By the time someone uses the line that much, they are going to be into the sport enough to want a good line, and will probably have both a WF for long distance casting (which they already would have under my scenario) and a DT for fine distance casting of dry flies. Bill http://www.tightlines.ca "Willi" wrote in message ... Bill Curry wrote: Hi, I would second Bill K's advice about the cost - you can buy an SA or Cortland and have a good quality line for less than $50-$60. I would say that the weight forward is MUCH easier to cast for a beginner, as the Double Taper does not put as much weight up front, and you will notice the difference in your casting, which at first will be 40 feet and under- this will be much easier with a WF line. Although there are some individual difference, overall a double taper and a weight forward line are the same for about the first thirty five to forty feet. (This is true for SA, Cortland and Orvis standard lines - not their specialty lines) Add a leader to this and in the average stream fishing situation you'll never get to the place where the difference between the two will show up. The advantage of a double taper (reversing it) is really kind of silly - by the time the front wears out, do you think the rest of the line is still unblemished? A damaged line is a damaged line. I disagree. Almost all of the wear on a fly line is on the first ten feet or so. I do think that you get twice the utility out of a double taper line. When the line has worn enough, I'll reverse a double taper and the other section is in close to new condition. The real advantage to a DT is that because it has less weight up front you can make more delicate (read - less splashy) casts when presenting dries at a distance. You won't be doing that for the first year or two probably, so go with the WF and have some fun! This is only true on the "specialty" lines. With most manufacturers, the tapers on the weight forward and the double tapers are the same for the first 40 feet or so. So for trout fishing and streams and most rivers which 95% + of all casts are (or should be) under fifty feet, I recommend a DT line because you get two lines for the price of one. With heavier outfits where you're going to need to boom out casts, a WF is better. Willi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reel fishermen | allen | General Discussion | 1 | April 17th, 2004 05:04 AM |
Backing advice | Aaron Hammer | Fly Fishing | 13 | January 30th, 2004 03:45 AM |
Line Snobs | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 15 | January 3rd, 2004 02:49 PM |
Good deal on great line! | schreecher | Bass Fishing | 0 | November 25th, 2003 05:08 AM |
PowerPro line | Eric | Bass Fishing | 2 | September 23rd, 2003 06:10 PM |