![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Mike Connor"
George´s description of the "overhand lob" also suggests that a fair weight was being used to cast Yes. He had the float, some added weight, plus the bait, a nightcrawler. Alltogether they put a substancial bend in the rod when casting and retrieving, so I would say they totalled a fair amount of weight. The actual cast was a slow lob that seemed to require very little effort. George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Adams" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... SNIP Yes. He had the float, some added weight, plus the bait, a nightcrawler. Alltogether they put a substancial bend in the rod when casting and retrieving, so I would say they totalled a fair amount of weight. The actual cast was a slow lob that seemed to require very little effort. Which explains also why he was using a softish rod. A fast rod will not work very well for this type of casting, depending on the weight used, one can not cast it slowly enough, ( the acceleration must be slow and steady), and more effort is required, although they are generally better implements for float fishing. Unfortunately, it is difficult to set the hook properly with such rods, especially at distance. There are so many different rod actions nowadays, not to mention all the other tackle, some highly specific to fish and circumstances, that it has become more and more difficult to keep track of them all. Most beginners are baffled by it all( Quite irrespective of the type of fishing they do). Much the same applies to flyrods and lines in the meantime. Having cause to ruminate on this and similar matters recently, I came to the conclusion that I now get almost as much pleasure and satisfaction from the technical side of things, tackle, flies, lines etc etc, as I do from actually fishing. I certainly spend more time on it! Indeed, I spent the last three days casting at least eight hours every day with various rods, lines, people, etc. Not fishing, but quite enjoyable nonetheless. This is not a recommendation that anybody else should do the same, there is no substitute for actually fishing, it just seems to have turned out that way for me. TL MC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... Indeed, I spent the last three days casting at least eight hours every day with various rods, lines, people, etc. Not fishing, but quite enjoyable nonetheless. Sounds like a standard three day fishing trip to me. --riverman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
reel | Lure builder | Bass Fishing | 13 | May 4th, 2004 06:52 PM |
Reel fishermen | allen | General Discussion | 1 | April 17th, 2004 05:04 AM |
center pin reel? | Sully | Fly Fishing | 4 | April 6th, 2004 03:09 PM |
Where Do You Put The Money - Rod or Reel? | BassAngler | Bass Fishing | 15 | February 20th, 2004 06:09 PM |
Eastern Spey Clave | Peter Charles | Fly Fishing | 5 | October 13th, 2003 09:31 PM |