![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Several Fishing and Recreational Boating groups work very closley here in
Florida. Mainly because the Save the Manatee Groups want to create severe speed restrictions on some of the waterways that Manatees "MAY" use. If there is a possibility a Manatee goes into that water they want an idle only speed zone, well that is 90% of the water in Florida in truth. So these groups commonly work together in fighting idle only zones. Like you don't expect me to be standing shoulder to shoulder with any PETA member. --- Chuck Coger http://www.fishin-pro.com "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... I wonder. Why is it that even within certian groups there are dyamtrically opposed segments that make defending a pastime from antis a less than stellar experience. In out circmstances most bass fishermen use some form of boat at one time or another and we don't want to lose that priveledge. We curse at other pleasure boaters when they bother us, and even have open animosity to some like PWC users. Yet for those anti's who would like to see boating reduced to the bare minimum for law enforcement, or less, they will attack any segment of our group. Boaters that is. Attack fishing and some none fishing pleasure boaters will jump on the band wagon. Attack PWC users and lots of fishermen may join in. Attack anything with a motor and the sail boaters will be ecstatic. Yet as a group, boaters, we could certainly stand up to any legal threat. I could say the same thing about hunters, trappers, and fishermen. If we could agree to deal with our differences between us and fight a unified fight against legislation we would be less threatened, and our numbers would probably not be reducing as they are today. Twice I have rescued PWC users this year, and one stranded pleasure boater. Once it cut short the time I spent fishing a tournament. Some of the other guys fishing the torunament said, they would have ignored them. Especially the PWC users. Wow! First off. Its against the law. Thats right Coast Guard regulations require you to render aid to a boater in distress. Most state regulation do as well. Secondly, thats a pretty awful thing to do to a person, and it widens the gap between users of public water ways. I doubt that the young lady I rescued from the back waters in behind Laikin Lakes will be more likely to vote for issues that harm fishermen, and she is more likely to vote for things to protect us. If I hadn't been fishing she would have had to swim and walk another mile before she got out to the secondary channel were there was some other pleasure boat traffic. Just something to think about. -- Bob La Londe Yuma, Az http://www.YumaBassMan.com Promote Your Fishing, Boating, or Guide Site for Free Simply add it to our index page. No reciprocal link required. (Requested, but not required) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New England outdoors web site | Tygab | General Discussion | 0 | June 15th, 2004 07:11 AM |
Outdoors in Niagara website! | Delmark | General Discussion | 0 | December 23rd, 2003 08:33 PM |
Visit my Michigan Outdoors website | Kirk & Vicky | General Discussion | 1 | November 30th, 2003 05:52 PM |
AD: New shopping site has Outdoors section, no ads! | Hershel Belkin | General Discussion | 0 | September 21st, 2003 03:09 AM |