Drying wading boots...

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. ..
Wolfgang wrote:
snip
In short, ...

Gawd, wouldn't THAT be a blessing.

Not surprisingly, those who
give the matter any though are pleased to reciprocate in kind.

Think about that sentence for a minute. When it finally dawns on
you that the last two words are as stupid as they are superfluous
you'll have learned a lesson.

Or not, I don't claim to be a GOOD teacher.

Well, you're never going to get any better at it if you don't try. So, go
ahead........teach us why those last two words were stupid and superfluous.

Wolfgang
gawd?

Wolfgang wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:

Not surprisingly, those who
give the matter any though are pleased to reciprocate in kind.

Think about that sentence for a minute. ...

... So, go
ahead........teach us why those last two words were stupid and superfluous.

I erred. Think about that sentence for a month.

I doubt that you'll learn anything, but then I never claimed
to be a GOOD teacher.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in
message ...
Wolfgang wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:

Not surprisingly, those who
give the matter any though are pleased to reciprocate in kind.

Think about that sentence for a minute. ...

... So, go
ahead........teach us why those last two words were stupid and
superfluous.

I erred.

No ****.

Think about that sentence for a month.

I doubt that you'll learn anything, but then I never claimed
to be a GOOD teacher.

Nevertheless, go ahead and give us your thoughts on why those last two
words were stupid and superfluous. I'm sure everyone here is just
fascinated.

Wolfgang
and, yes, they ARE watching.

Wolfgang wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:
Not surprisingly, those who
give the matter any though are pleased to reciprocate in kind.

Think about that sentence for a month.

I doubt that you'll learn anything, but then I never claimed
to be a GOOD teacher.

Nevertheless, go ahead and give us your thoughts on why those last two
words were stupid and superfluous. I'm sure everyone here is just
fascinated.

Nonsense. Anyone who is even remotely interested has figured
it out long ago. You may eventually figure it out yourself,
but it would help if you weren't dictionary averse. (That
was a HINT.)

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in
message . ..
Wolfgang wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:
Not surprisingly, those who
give the matter any though are pleased to reciprocate in kind.

Think about that sentence for a month.

I doubt that you'll learn anything, but then I never claimed
to be a GOOD teacher.

Nevertheless, go ahead and give us your thoughts on why those last
two
words were stupid and superfluous. I'm sure everyone here is just
fascinated.

Nonsense. Anyone who is even remotely interested has figured
it out long ago.

Maybe so, but what the hell......go ahead and give it a shot anyway.
At the very least, it's a chance for you to demonstrate that just this
once you actually have some idea of what you're talking about. As the
matter stands now, there probably aren't many readers here who fail to
see what you've done to yourself......again......and are continuing to
do in what we all know is a futile attempt to divert attention from
it. So, go on.......what have you got to lose?

You may eventually figure it out yourself,

No, I don't think so.

but it would help if you weren't dictionary averse.

How many people in this group would you guess are immune to the humor
inherent in a self-styled writer who reads poorly?

(That was a HINT.)

And as soon as someone explains to you what it hinted AT, you be sure
to let us know........o.k.?

Wolfgang

Wolfgang wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
You may eventually figure it out yourself,

No, I don't think so.

Yeah, you're probably right.

How many people in this group would you guess are immune to the humor
inherent in a self-styled writer who reads poorly?

Now THAT'S funny.

(That was a HINT.)

And as soon as someone explains to you what it hinted AT, you be sure
to let us know........o.k.?

Look up the following words:

reciprocate
redundancy
prolixity

If you STILL can't figure it out, I guess we'll have to conclude
that I'm not a GOOD teacher.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in
message . ..
Wolfgang wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
You may eventually figure it out yourself,

No, I don't think so.

Yeah, you're probably right.

Oh, there's no doubt about it.

How many people in this group would you guess are immune to the
humor
inherent in a self-styled writer who reads poorly?

Now THAT'S funny.

Yeah, that's what I said.

(That was a HINT.)

And as soon as someone explains to you what it hinted AT, you be
sure
to let us know........o.k.?

Look up the following words:

reciprocate
redundancy
prolixity

Why?

If you STILL can't figure it out,

Figure what out?

I guess we'll have to conclude
that I'm not a GOOD teacher.

We agreed some time ago that you aren't a good teacher. However, I'm
reasonably certain that I'm not the only reader here who would like to
know why you think the words "in kind" as I used them earlier in this
exchange were stupid and superfluous. Go ahead, give it shot.

Wolfgang