A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing Tying
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

reinventing the Wheel



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th, 2004, 01:27 PM
Scott Seidman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default reinventing the Wheel

(Tom Littleton) wrote in
:

I have to rant for a moment!! I just got the current issue of Fly Tyer
in the mail yesterday, and one of the features is an AK Best design of
a "hovering cranefly".
Now, old A.K. claims he sweated over this one for a couple years, but
there is ABSOLUTELY no functional difference from a classic Catskill
Variant. See Flick's
instructions for the Grey Fox Variant, and the final fly. All A.K.
does is make use of, and liberally plug, Whiting's Coq de Leon
feathers. A similar type of article/
advertisement trend seems to be creeping into Fly Tyer as a
whole....The result is a lot of re-inventing the Wheel, wrapping it in
some tyer's ego and foisting on the public. Rant mode off......
Tom


I got ya, Tom. I've been feeling that way about the mag for a long time
(but of course I still buy it!).

When its your living to crank out articles on tying new flies, you come up
with some outrageous **** that simply won't help anyone fish. There's few
new flies in there that excite me. I did like their recent article on
realistic immitation, though, and the review of the Magic Tool talked me
into buying one (and I hope you'll soon see the results). Of course, you
can pretty much do the same stuff with a slit piece of closed cell foam and
a bulldog clamp, but I don't regret the purchase.

So, I guess I like the mag for the features and new product reviews, but
many of the new flies presented just miss with me.

I do like them Coq de Leon feathers. They make damn good tails. You need
to use more fibers than you would w/ fibbets, but I like the idea of losing
an artificial material for a natural that works better. Of course, if I
had a stash of spade feathers like yours, I wouldn't spend nine bucks a
pack for tail fibers

Scott
  #2  
Old May 26th, 2004, 10:06 PM
Tom Littleton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default reinventing the Wheel

Scott states:
Of course, if I
had a stash of spade feathers like yours, I wouldn't spend nine bucks a
pack for tail fibers


step one: contact Charlie Collins
step two: ask for a few packs of spades
step three: pay him $5 for each large pack

Pardo is overpriced, overrated, and for most uses over-stiff.
Tom
  #4  
Old May 27th, 2004, 12:39 AM
Tom Littleton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default reinventing the Wheel

Scott asks:
This Coq de Leon stuff is pardo?? I've seen that name bandies about, but
haven't figured it out ye


Pardo feathers are from, IIRC, the base of the neck of the Coq de Leon,
containing very stiff, long fibers. Nice feathers, for certain purposes, very
pricey. The usual Coq de Leon tailing comes from the saddle feathers, I
believe.
....off to the Beaverkill, are you? Enjoy!!!
Tom
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.