![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 04:11:01 -0800, Jon Splane wrote:
|Snipped) Dave, How about if you put up or shut up. Point us to a charter to this newgroup. You stated in two seperate posts responding to "ozemail" that he was in violation of the charter of this newsgroup. You owe him an apology for your flaming as you are clearly in error as to the existence of a charter for this group. It is not necessary for any newsgroup to have a charter for SPAM to be considered a bad thing. Few charters have any means of enforcement anyway. However, ISPs often will enforce their own terms of service and those include general statements that can be construed to, "Don't irritate the natives, particularly with advertising." Advertising (in any way other than sig files) in conversational newsgroups is against Nettiquette and Usenet conventions. If the advertiser's ISP is a worthy one, they'll listen to complaints sent to them. People have lost their accounts over it. Not a good thing if you have to go through the hassle of moving your whole Web site to another provider. In general, one time advertisements of personal items for sale are acceptable in most groups. Depends on the users. In general, commercial advertising is not okay. Advertisers would be wise to consider whether or not it's a _good_ thing to **** off the people they're trying to sell things to. Then again, I've only seen two SPAMmers with good enough Web sites to be able to read them and only one of them had any decent merchandize. Like SPAMmer, so product? -- rbc: vixen Fairly harmless Hit reply to email. But strip out the 'invalid.' Though I'm very slow to respond. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|