product ideas

"Jon Senior" jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk wrote in message
...
Nathaniel Porter opined the following...
SNIP
It could also be used to suggest to some drivers that they might wish to
use the vast and frequently empty tract of tarmac known as the inside
lane!

Apart from the fact that overtaking on the inside has been identified as
being a major cause of motorway accidents as well as being an offence. As
far as I can remember the law states you're supposed to drive on the left.
Always!

B=


Jon

"Brendan Murray" wrote in message
...

"Jon Senior" jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk wrote in message
...
Nathaniel Porter opined the following...
SNIP
It could also be used to suggest to some drivers that they might wish to
use the vast and frequently empty tract of tarmac known as the inside
lane!

Apart from the fact that overtaking on the inside has been identified as
being a major cause of motorway accidents as well as being an offence. As
far as I can remember the law states you're supposed to drive on the left.
Always!


A reason to encourage people to use the inside lane, shirley?

Brendan Murray wrote:

"Jon Senior" jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk wrote in message
...
Nathaniel Porter opined the following...
SNIP
It could also be used to suggest to some drivers that they might wish to
use the vast and frequently empty tract of tarmac known as the inside
lane!

Apart from the fact that overtaking on the inside has been identified as
being a major cause of motorway accidents as well as being an offence. As
far as I can remember the law states you're supposed to drive on the left.
Always!

Please point to the law / section of the Highway Code that outlaws
'undertaking'.
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

"SteveH" wrote in message
...

Please point to the law / section of the Highway Code that outlaws
'undertaking'.

It's acceptable to "undertake" if the traffic stream in your lane is moving
faster than the traffic streams in others.

If the knobs on the Brum section of the M6 want to sit bumper-to-bumper, and
get sunburnt by flashing brakelights that's their choice - me? I prefer
sitting in that "empty tract" of an inside lane at a pleasant 55mph (rather
than an erratic 20 - 65 in the other lanes) until I'm well clear of the West
Mids.

To the original poster: perhaps we need some sort of device that shoots farm
silage from bonnet mounted cannons at anyone on a mobile phone while
driving? Or, a little sticker (or anal cattle prod) reminding drivers that
the use of indicators is mandatory, not optional.

--
Ken Davidson
DocDelete


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 22/05/04

--

"DocDelete" wrote in message
...
"SteveH" wrote in message
...

Please point to the law / section of the Highway Code that outlaws
'undertaking'.

It's acceptable to "undertake" if the traffic stream in your lane is
moving
faster than the traffic streams in others.

If the knobs on the Brum section of the M6 want to sit bumper-to-bumper,
and
get sunburnt by flashing brakelights that's their choice - me? I prefer
sitting in that "empty tract" of an inside lane at a pleasant 55mph
(rather
than an erratic 20 - 65 in the other lanes) until I'm well clear of the
West
Mids.

To the original poster: perhaps we need some sort of device that shoots
farm
silage from bonnet mounted cannons at anyone on a mobile phone while
driving? Or, a little sticker (or anal cattle prod) reminding drivers
that
the use of indicators is mandatory, not optional.

--
Ken Davidson
DocDelete


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 22/05/04



Good idea! We also need something to remind drivers about stopping at red
lights instead of ignoring them!

----------------------------------------------------------------
Find a New Way Of Life At Marillion.com

Pete W.

On Thu, 27 May 2004 11:36:35 +0100, "DocDelete"
wrote:

To the original poster: perhaps we need some sort of device that shoots farm
silage from bonnet mounted cannons at anyone on a mobile phone while
driving?

I've always wondered why the sane majority don't toot their horns at drivers with
mobiles.

Liz

FF wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 May 2004 11:36:35 +0100, "DocDelete"

wrote:

To the original poster: perhaps we need some sort of device that shoots
farm
silage from bonnet mounted cannons at anyone on a mobile phone while
driving?

I've always wondered why the sane majority don't toot their horns at
drivers with
mobiles.

Liz

If I have got a passenger with me, I ask them to jot down the registration.
Then I report them here http://www.hogline.co.uk/index.asp

Jim

I have the number for my local police on my mobile. Website a good idea
though, nice to know there is one. Any idea what happens after you report it
though?


I've always wondered why the sane majority don't toot their horns at
drivers with
mobiles.

Liz

If I have got a passenger with me, I ask them to jot down the
registration.
Then I report them here http://www.hogline.co.uk/index.asp

Jim

A pocket-size mobile phone jammer would be a useful device. It need not
have much in the way of range, just enough to cover a railway carriage or a
small restaurant. Of course you might have to think up some other job
description for it. . .

Ron Robinson

"R.N. Robinson" wrote in
message ...
A pocket-size mobile phone jammer would be a useful device. It need not
have much in the way of range, just enough to cover a railway carriage or
a
small restaurant. Of course you might have to think up some other job
description for it. . .
---------------------------------------------------
Better still a jammer to stop all the cross posting on this group.
Now hit delete!