Seal hunt begins; IFAW bears witness

"I R Canuck" wrote in message
news:3lwhc.39530$mn3.4702@clgrps13...
Re-post (original didn't show up on my news server)
"pearl" wrote:
"I R Canuck" wrote:
"pearl" wrote:
To clarify;

"pearl" wrote in message ...
"I R Canuck" wrote in message
news:0rYgc.35278$mn3.13635@clgrps13...
..
The IFAW observations showed 1.66% of seals skinned alive.

Of those observed. So who's assuming that all seals are skinned
immediately? You,- when it suits you.

I meant- counting only those *observed* being skinned, which
you used to find the percentage of the total- observed and not.

Pearl, again . . .

The IFAW observed 180 seals being killed. They observed 3 skinned
alive.

3/180 = 1.66%

The seals which were skinned at a later time (remember they were
already observed being killed) are dead.

Provide evidence to support your claim if you can.

http://dict.die.net/killed/
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

Kill

1. To deprive of life, animal or vegetable, in any manner or
by any means; to render inanimate; to put to death; to
slay.

http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw/dfiles/file_95.pdf
"Of these, 96 seals were shot, 56 seals were shot and then clubbed
or gaffed, 19 seals were clubbed or gaffed, and 8 seals were killed by
unknown means."

Indicates all of the seals observed were killed. They would be dead
they could not have been skinned alive.

No. Look at the Comments Violation / Abuse column.
'Shooting and leave to suffer' appears time after time.
Left to suffer until they're butchered.

Therefore, they would not have been skinned alive.

Your BS-ing.

No, I'm not.

Yes you are. Shame on you.