![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob, I'm not encouraging anyone to use a second set - don't misunderstand
me. I rarely (if ever) do it myself. I was simply stating that there have been times when, for whatever reason, my initial hookset was not exactly solid & the result has been a lost bass & a missed opportunity. In the tournament game we play opportunities simply can't be missed. So I was saying that there were times when I wished I had applied a second hookset, not that I make a habit of it... Warren "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... Warren, You got me going on this area a bit with your help when I was trying to refine my Wacky Wormin'. I am learning a bit about it now as I refine my crank bait techniques. I have to say after barely getting a couple fish in the boat that were hooked through light tissue or only skin hooked I doubt you could convince me to go for a double hookset. Yes I did try a second hookset on a bass the other day, after I had two or three come off on me. It didn't seem to make any difference. My thought is to go with as wide a gap hook as you feel the bait can support, and stay with ultra sharp (brand name not withstanding) high quality hooks. It was after that I had the accidental revelation that I was using the wrong rod for the job. I still have some issue to resolve for some baits, but I'm working on it. For any bait that uses a small light hook I would have to say that an ultra sharp hook on a lighter slower rod would be the way to go. I am going to dig a couple medium / medium or medium slow rods out of the stuff I had put away for drop shots, crank baits, and topwater. All of my crank baits have top quality hooks as do my topwaters. I'll have to rely on the penetration of a sharp point, but I can't see myself going for a second hookset again. IMHO, its about finding the exact best hook for a particular application, and using the best rod for the job. Hook set is extremely important for heavy plastics, but I just don't see myself going for a second hookset. The only time I could see going for a second hookset is if I never got a first hook set. Those moments when a fish hits, and you set on it only to feel slack line as the fish dives towards you. I defer to your expertise most times, as I have learned quite a lot from your posts when you choose to be helpful, but the second hookset just dosen't cut it for me. Certainly not with smaller hooks like that. -- ** FREE Fishing Lures ** Weekly drawing ** Public Fishing and Boating Forums ** www.YumaBassMan.com "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Yea but what about the times when you instantly say (before loosing the fish) to yourself "damn, I don't think I got all of that one..." Warren "Eric Dreher" wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:08:47 -0500, "Chris Rennert" wrote: I definitely agree about multiple hook sets. I just use the sharpest hooks I possibly can and that gives me the confidence that when I stick them, I got them. I can only think of three or four time that I "double-set" the hook. Each time resulted in a lost fish. As you, Chris, I just trust in a good hook...Gamakatsu, and replace 'em when they're worn out or bent for any reason. ---------------------------------------------- "Kerry's policies would run the country deeper and deeper into deficit." - John Edwards |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fishing Hooks | Bill Kiene | Fly Fishing | 23 | June 30th, 2011 01:24 AM |
Magnetic hooks | vincent p. norris | Fly Fishing Tying | 11 | March 18th, 2004 06:40 AM |
Rusting hooks | SHRED© | Bass Fishing | 4 | March 9th, 2004 12:00 AM |
Gamakatsu Fly Tying Hooks - Opinion | Cornmuse | Fly Fishing Tying | 3 | February 20th, 2004 04:08 AM |
hooks? | Rodney | General Discussion | 0 | October 22nd, 2003 07:22 PM |