![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Warren wrote: "The sad part is the gal in CA's supposed 22.8 pounder that
was never witnessed by anyone that knows what they're looking at has now been recognized as an official line class record... " Nope. Not yet. She's still pending.the 12 pound line class - not pending the all tackle record. http://igfa.org/records/records.cfm FWIW note that her son is also pending the 4 pound line class. IMHO his pending 4 pound line class record is more remarkable than her pending 12 pound line class. His was 18 pounds 8 oz. on 4 pound line and hers was 22 pounds 8 oz. on 12 pound line. I wonder what the lab tested their line at? It's hard to believe that there would not be any wind knots or kinks or chips to reduce those lines down, especially the 4 pound line. As a reference point my bass was 16 pounds 2 oz and the 6 pound tippet broke at the IGFA testing lab at 4.19 pounds at a wind knot. I played my bass for 30 minutes using a good strong 10 foot rod, well tuned reel with good drag set. IGFA placed my bass in the 6 pound tippet class because the tippet was rated at 6 pounds by the manufacturer. Was her son using a 4 pound line or did IGFA place him in the 4 pound class due to lab testing? If he was using a 4 pound line on a typical spin fishing setup, it would be remarkable that the drag, line, rod and reel would catch an 18 pound bass. JMHO Good Luck! John |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Klutz me wrote: "my bass was 16 pounds 2 oz"
I should have typed: "my bass was 14 pounds 2 oz." Sorry about that, shrug. What was going through my mind was that I had many 2 pound trout break me off using a 4 pound test line on a spinning outfit. I won't use less than 6 pound test on a spin outfit because hang ups take all my lures and worms. I'm spending all my time replacing them and not fishing. LOL An 18 pound bass on a 4 pound line is remarkable! Good luck! John |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Lindsey" wrote in message SNIP An 18 pound bass on a 4 pound line is remarkable! I agree, that is truly a feat. Everything has to go just right to land a fish that size on 4 pound. The only thing that I know of first hand that approaches that feat is my friend Gil landing a 48 inch muskie on 4 lb. mono after it ate a crappie he was reeling in. It was a spring time fish and fairly thin, so it probably only weighed about 22 pounds. -- Steve OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve wrote:
The only thing that I know of first hand that approaches that feat is my friend Gil landing a 48 inch muskie on 4 lb. mono I once caught an 18 pound carp on monofilament sewing thread (about 3/4 pound break strength). For about a season and a half back around '74 I did a lot of super-ultralight fishing. Long noodle rods, 1/100 to 1/64 oz jigs and 2 pound line max -- more often, the sewing thread. Mostly it was panfish and stream trout. But I carried the rod with me most trips and landed LM to almost 5, SM to about 4, and a northern pike in the 10 pound range on it. But this one early summer trip, my son and I were headed out on lillinonah at about 5PM, and I cast a 1/64 oz, white marabou jig at a stump in the cove the ramp is in, the fish picked it up, and for the next 40 minutes, I basically followed it around the cove with the electric motor on high, reeling and backreeling as necessary to keep some pressure on the fish. At various times my audience ranged as high as 10 or 12 people cheering me on. I was never really worried that the line would break. That was less a concern with the sewing thread than with 2 pound fishing mono, because the sewing mono had a huge amount of stretch (50% or better) that acted like a shock absorber. A WAS worried that it was just going to go down and sulk, and I wouldn't be able to put enough pressure on it to remind it that it was hooked, but it never stopped pulling and swimming, and eventually it wore down enough to get it to the boat, and my kid just held the net in the water and I let it swim into the net. RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RichZ" wrote in message SNIP I once caught an 18 pound carp on monofilament sewing thread (about 3/4 pound break strength). What amazes me is that it didn't wrap you on anything. I mean, one tough weed stalk would have been enough to pop that thread. Great job there. -- Steve OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, but the record has been officially listed by the Fishing Hall of Fame
John. Not only that, but they're publicly calling it the "unofficial world record". Seems the IGFA is not the sole governing body of fishing records. What do they know in Wisconsin anyway? Warren -- http://www.fishingworld.com/MesaTackleSupply/ http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com http://www.secretweaponlures.com http://www.warrenwolk.com/ http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com/ "John Lindsey" wrote in message ... Warren wrote: "The sad part is the gal in CA's supposed 22.8 pounder that was never witnessed by anyone that knows what they're looking at has now been recognized as an official line class record... " Nope. Not yet. She's still pending.the 12 pound line class - not pending the all tackle record. http://igfa.org/records/records.cfm FWIW note that her son is also pending the 4 pound line class. IMHO his pending 4 pound line class record is more remarkable than her pending 12 pound line class. His was 18 pounds 8 oz. on 4 pound line and hers was 22 pounds 8 oz. on 12 pound line. I wonder what the lab tested their line at? It's hard to believe that there would not be any wind knots or kinks or chips to reduce those lines down, especially the 4 pound line. As a reference point my bass was 16 pounds 2 oz and the 6 pound tippet broke at the IGFA testing lab at 4.19 pounds at a wind knot. I played my bass for 30 minutes using a good strong 10 foot rod, well tuned reel with good drag set. IGFA placed my bass in the 6 pound tippet class because the tippet was rated at 6 pounds by the manufacturer. Was her son using a 4 pound line or did IGFA place him in the 4 pound class due to lab testing? If he was using a 4 pound line on a typical spin fishing setup, it would be remarkable that the drag, line, rod and reel would catch an 18 pound bass. JMHO Good Luck! John |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Ah, but the record has been officially listed by the Fishing Hall of Fame John. Not only that, but they're publicly calling it the "unofficial world record". Seems the IGFA is not the sole governing body of fishing records. What do they know in Wisconsin anyway? We know how to catch bass on Boom Lake! -- Steve OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve wrote:
I mean, one tough weed stalk At that time, a weed in Lilli would have been the only one. but there was loads of floating driftwood -- just not in pond brook cove. RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in message ... "John Lindsey" wrote in message SNIP An 18 pound bass on a 4 pound line is remarkable! I agree, that is truly a feat. Everything has to go just right to land a fish that size on 4 pound. The only thing that I know of first hand that approaches that feat is my friend Gil landing a 48 inch muskie on 4 lb. mono after it ate a crappie he was reeling in. It was a spring time fish and fairly thin, so it probably only weighed about 22 pounds. -- Steve OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com Actually, a good reel and you can go a long time on big fish and light line. I hooked a 40#+ salmon (much bigger than a 38# I landed on 12#) on a spinning rod and a rattletrap and 6# mono. Had to boat 3 times and finally the line broke on the gillraker, line was really frayed in that area, after 2 hours and 10 minutes. Should have put more drag on or made my partner net it earlier. He said was not ready. Bill |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ha! I knew I couls rouz ya Stevo!
WW -- http://www.fishingworld.com/MesaTackleSupply/ http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com http://www.secretweaponlures.com http://www.warrenwolk.com/ http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com/ "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in message ... "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Ah, but the record has been officially listed by the Fishing Hall of Fame John. Not only that, but they're publicly calling it the "unofficial world record". Seems the IGFA is not the sole governing body of fishing records. What do they know in Wisconsin anyway? We know how to catch bass on Boom Lake! -- Steve OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newer World Record Bass | Josh | Bass Fishing | 13 | December 30th, 2003 05:56 AM |
More on potential world record | RGarri7470 | Bass Fishing | 30 | December 16th, 2003 12:58 AM |
new world record? | RGarri7470 | Bass Fishing | 55 | December 2nd, 2003 07:48 PM |
bass fishing world cup | achig1 | Bass Fishing | 1 | November 26th, 2003 12:51 AM |
Okeechobee Journal (long) | TNBass | Bass Fishing | 14 | October 20th, 2003 05:10 AM |