![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Charles wrote: So here I am on Whitemans, wet wading, one small fly box, one spool of tippet, one rod, one reel, and thinking about what I am actually doing instead of just chucking the contents of multiple flyboxes at unimpressed fish. Before I left the house, I had decided where I would fish using the right bug for that water, time of day, and at that point in the season. Bingo, epiphany time. By forcing a minimalist approach, I have to really know what I'm doing as there's no margin for error. I've stripped away the excuses, the multiple flybox crutches, and faced the fish armed with a handful of flies and my wits. Stripped of the superfluous gear, I'm reading water, examining bugs, search bankside bushes, catching fish, and in the process, discover that there's an amazing mental clarity to the minimalist approach. Is it more fun? You betchya. I think that's just a mental thing and not a function of carrying alot or just a small amount of stuff. I've gone from one extreme to another, a number of times over the years. If I'm fishing my home river and I'm doing a short outing, I usually will take a small flybox, reading glasses, a spool of tippet and a pair of nippers and stick em in a shirt pocket. Sometimes if I'm going out for a hour or two in the evening, I just go with my rod with the fly tied on that I'm going to fish. If I lose the fly, I'm done. But sometimes I'll throw on my vest. For small waters I that I'm going to hike into, I've started wearing a small fanny pack that holds a couple fly boxes, tippet, nippers, reading glasses, my camera, floatant, dessicant, weight as well as a rainjacket, some food, TP and a water filter bottle. I'm pleased with how it's worked. It's comfortable and pretty convenient. Then there's my vest. I don't like a vest to feel like a backpack and I try and keep down the weight. If you want, you can packed an incredible assortment of stuff that you MIGHT need into a vest. I've settled on a middle of the road approach for quite a few years where I carry a big enough assortment of gear to cover just about any trout situation and still have a vest that's comfortable to wear over a long day. Willi |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:07 -0600, Willi wrote:
I think that's just a mental thing and not a function of carrying alot or just a small amount of stuff. Unless you're a lazy angler like myself, then leaving stuff behind forces me to concentrate. I've gone from one extreme to another, a number of times over the years. If I'm fishing my home river and I'm doing a short outing, I usually will take a small flybox, reading glasses, a spool of tippet and a pair of nippers and stick em in a shirt pocket. Sometimes if I'm going out for a hour or two in the evening, I just go with my rod with the fly tied on that I'm going to fish. If I lose the fly, I'm done. But sometimes I'll throw on my vest. For small waters I that I'm going to hike into, I've started wearing a small fanny pack that holds a couple fly boxes, tippet, nippers, reading glasses, my camera, floatant, dessicant, weight as well as a rainjacket, some food, TP and a water filter bottle. I'm pleased with how it's worked. It's comfortable and pretty convenient. Then there's my vest. I don't like a vest to feel like a backpack and I try and keep down the weight. If you want, you can packed an incredible assortment of stuff that you MIGHT need into a vest. I've settled on a middle of the road approach for quite a few years where I carry a big enough assortment of gear to cover just about any trout situation and still have a vest that's comfortable to wear over a long day. I will take more stuff with me when I'm going somewhere that I don't know, but I don't see the need for my local waters. Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Willi wrote:
Then there's my vest. I don't like a vest to feel like a backpack and I try and keep down the weight. If you want, you can packed an incredible assortment of stuff that you MIGHT need into a vest. I've settled on a middle of the road approach for quite a few years where I carry a big enough assortment of gear to cover just about any trout situation and still have a vest that's comfortable to wear over a long day. Your vest weighs about five pounds. Warren's weighs about forty. My vest is maybe fifteen. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:07 -0600, Willi wrote:
I think that's just a mental thing and not a function of carrying alot or just a small amount of stuff. Unless you're a lazy angler like myself, then leaving stuff behind forces me to concentrate. I've gone from one extreme to another, a number of times over the years. If I'm fishing my home river and I'm doing a short outing, I usually will take a small flybox, reading glasses, a spool of tippet and a pair of nippers and stick em in a shirt pocket. Sometimes if I'm going out for a hour or two in the evening, I just go with my rod with the fly tied on that I'm going to fish. If I lose the fly, I'm done. But sometimes I'll throw on my vest. For small waters I that I'm going to hike into, I've started wearing a small fanny pack that holds a couple fly boxes, tippet, nippers, reading glasses, my camera, floatant, dessicant, weight as well as a rainjacket, some food, TP and a water filter bottle. I'm pleased with how it's worked. It's comfortable and pretty convenient. Then there's my vest. I don't like a vest to feel like a backpack and I try and keep down the weight. If you want, you can packed an incredible assortment of stuff that you MIGHT need into a vest. I've settled on a middle of the road approach for quite a few years where I carry a big enough assortment of gear to cover just about any trout situation and still have a vest that's comfortable to wear over a long day. I will take more stuff with me when I'm going somewhere that I don't know, but I don't see the need for my local waters. Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Willi wrote:
Then there's my vest. I don't like a vest to feel like a backpack and I try and keep down the weight. If you want, you can packed an incredible assortment of stuff that you MIGHT need into a vest. I've settled on a middle of the road approach for quite a few years where I carry a big enough assortment of gear to cover just about any trout situation and still have a vest that's comfortable to wear over a long day. Your vest weighs about five pounds. Warren's weighs about forty. My vest is maybe fifteen. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Life in Congo, Part V: What a (long) strange trip its being.... | riverman | Fly Fishing | 58 | September 25th, 2003 12:28 PM |
Rangers keep ATV users on road to conservation | Jim | Fly Fishing | 0 | September 23rd, 2003 07:16 AM |