A new Presidential Order....

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:10:30 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
snip
Bush didn't have a campaign in the 70s and 80s...you, like many
others,
seem to ignore that much of this is not new, and some of these
guys have
been saying this stuff about Kerry for decades. ...

These guys were proven to be liars in the 70's, proven to be liars
in the '80's and proven to be liars just last week. They can repeat
their lies in perpetuity but that doesn't turn lies into truth.

OK, let's suppose that is true (it isn't, but let's say it is).
Then
that absolutely proves that Bush (and his campaign) absolutely can't
be
behind the lies. But moreover, whether lies or truth, it
acknowledges
that they've been saying these things for 30-plus years, which
proves
Bush and his campaign aren't behind any of the assertions.

So, again, it's a "pick your problem" situation: giving you your own
rope, Bush isn't and can't be behind it, so he has no right,
responsibility, or means to stop it, and Kerry (and his campaign)
know
this isn't and couldn't be something cooked up by Bush or his
campaign.
Yet they repeatedly and publicly say otherwise. And in the
meantime,
hired, paid, and official members of the Kerry campaign serve on
multiple 527 boards and advisory committees that do "smear" ads on
Bush...face it, best case, Kerry is, again, no better than Bush.

HTH,
R

Hm........

So, if Curley Lambeau coached the Green bay Packer's in 1937, Vince
Lombardi couldn't possibly have done so in 1967, huh? Well, how can
you NOT love that kind of logic?

Have you ever considered actually working for a living or something?
I mean, you obviously ain't cut out for this ****.

Wolfgang

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:58:35 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote:

So, if Curley Lambeau coached the Green bay Packer's in 1937, Vince
Lombardi couldn't possibly have done so in 1967, huh?

EXACTLY! I'm glad Bert and Ernie were finally able to explain it all to
you...

Well, how can you NOT love that kind of logic?

Yeah, I know...it seems SO simple on the face of it...but with Big Bird
and the gang there helping you, you ARE sort of cheating...

Have you ever considered actually working for a living or something?

Naw...I mean, it's just easier to overbill the Government for pickles
and oil...or something like that...

I mean, you obviously ain't cut out for this ****.

So true, so true, what with me being a sensitive young lad and all...and
thanks ever so for your concern...

Dickie
Ya know, you'd think you and Ken would be bestest pals, what with
sharing having been beaten up in school every day and all...

wrote in message
...


Ya know, you'd think you and Ken would be bestest pals, what with
sharing having been beaten up in school every day and all...

You should'a been there.

Wolfgang
who has many fond memories of grade school.

wrote in message
...


Ya know, you'd think you and Ken would be bestest pals, what with
sharing having been beaten up in school every day and all...

You should'a been there.

Wolfgang
who has many fond memories of grade school.

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:58:35 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote:

So, if Curley Lambeau coached the Green bay Packer's in 1937, Vince
Lombardi couldn't possibly have done so in 1967, huh?

EXACTLY! I'm glad Bert and Ernie were finally able to explain it all to
you...

Well, how can you NOT love that kind of logic?

Yeah, I know...it seems SO simple on the face of it...but with Big Bird
and the gang there helping you, you ARE sort of cheating...

Have you ever considered actually working for a living or something?

Naw...I mean, it's just easier to overbill the Government for pickles
and oil...or something like that...

I mean, you obviously ain't cut out for this ****.

So true, so true, what with me being a sensitive young lad and all...and
thanks ever so for your concern...

Dickie
Ya know, you'd think you and Ken would be bestest pals, what with
sharing having been beaten up in school every day and all...