For Agent Users

Wolfgang wrote:

"Conan the Librarian" wrote in message
...

Wolfgang wrote:


Ah! A clue!

Denway is the Chicago Cubs baseball field!

Wolfgang
geographer nonpareil

Silly man. Everyone knows that's the Red Sox' park. And it's
spelled "Benway".


Chuck Vance (Dr.)


Hm.......

So, taking this line of reasoning to its logical conclusion, anonymous
posters are avid baseball fans who delight in possessing
memorabilia........that is to say, they collect Benway balls.

Or (Dr.) Benway balls and Steely Dans.


Chuck Vance (literary allusions'r'us)

"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
...

Anyways, now my "removed" posts are back on google again. That leads
me to believe that X-No-Archive has no real legal authority, it's only
a courtesy request. Legally, Usenet posts might be "public domain",
but you'd have to ask an expert.


Good advice. Wolfie?

--riverman

"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
...

Anyways, now my "removed" posts are back on google again. That leads
me to believe that X-No-Archive has no real legal authority, it's only
a courtesy request. Legally, Usenet posts might be "public domain",
but you'd have to ask an expert.


Good advice. Wolfie?

--riverman

riverman wrote:
"Jonathan Cook" wrote:
... Legally, Usenet posts might be "public domain",
but you'd have to ask an expert.

Good advice. Wolfie?

SPLORK

--
Ken Fortenberry

riverman wrote:
"Jonathan Cook" wrote:
... Legally, Usenet posts might be "public domain",
but you'd have to ask an expert.

Good advice. Wolfie?

SPLORK

--
Ken Fortenberry

"riverman" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
...

Anyways, now my "removed" posts are back on google again. That
leads
me to believe that X-No-Archive has no real legal authority, it's
only
a courtesy request. Legally, Usenet posts might be "public
domain",
but you'd have to ask an expert.


Good advice. Wolfie?

I am unable to comment on this matter at this time as my petition for
guardian ad litem status r.o.f.f. is still pending. In the
meantime, Helen Waite is handling all damage claims for those intent
on seeking recompense for unauthorized use of their allegedly
copyrighted materials.

Wolfgang
for D.C. & H.

"riverman" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Cook" wrote in message
...

Anyways, now my "removed" posts are back on google again. That
leads
me to believe that X-No-Archive has no real legal authority, it's
only
a courtesy request. Legally, Usenet posts might be "public
domain",
but you'd have to ask an expert.


Good advice. Wolfie?

I am unable to comment on this matter at this time as my petition for
guardian ad litem status r.o.f.f. is still pending. In the
meantime, Helen Waite is handling all damage claims for those intent
on seeking recompense for unauthorized use of their allegedly
copyrighted materials.

Wolfgang
for D.C. & H.

GaryM wrote:

BTW, I am not sure either of how long Google's policy will last. For
example Groups Beta does not appear to honor the no-archive header.


Maybe because it's just a Beta?

GaryM wrote:

BTW, I am not sure either of how long Google's policy will last. For
example Groups Beta does not appear to honor the no-archive header.


Maybe because it's just a Beta?

"Stan Gula" wrote in news:CW4Zc.708$P46.562
@trndny03:

Maybe because it's just a Beta?

Actually see J. Cook's message earlier today.