![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uh, yeah.....I agree, I think
"David H. Lipman" wrote in message news:m0TWc.5991$rT1.2901@trndny02... You would think and hope, but based upon experience it isn't true. Even if it was, they only help with the known, not the unknown. Albeit, heuristic scans increase new infector catch rates. On the other hand, heuristics increase the number of false Positive declarations. In addition, Social Engineering is the art of getting past physical and software security measures as shown by the expert, the original Phone Phreaker, Michael Mitnick. The best defense, practice Safe Hex ! Dave wrote in message ... | On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:31:55 GMT, "David H. Lipman" | wrote: | | Yes, that's true but what's different is the "bot". Software designed to crawl through | UseNet News Groups and capture email addresses to sell as lists for spammers. In addition | the Swen Internet worm has its own engine to post to and read from UseNet News Groups. By | posting executable files posing (masquerading) as Microsoft updates (patches) the Swen | Internet worm utilizes Social Engineering to in effect con users into executing supposed | patches from Microsoft to infect the readers platform. Infected platforms will then scan | UseNet News Groups and search them for email addreses. Based upon addresses captured from | UseNet it will then send email via its own email engine to unsuspecting recipients. What | both (bots and NNTP worms) don't do is scan web sites. Simply because UseNet News Groups | are fixed but web sites vary. | | So, everyone should have a firewall, virus and ad ware detectors by | now, don't you think... | | | Dave | | | | | | wrote in message ... | | On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:45:34 GMT, "David H. Lipman" | | wrote: | | | | You shouldn't post your own email address, unmunged, to UseNet because you leave yourself | | open to spammers and worse, the Swen internet worm and others. | | | | It is even WORSE to post another's email address, unmunged, without their permission. | | | | Please do NOT do this in the future. | | | | Reasonable advice but a majority of byline newspaper articles contain | | the writer's email address as the subject article did.. | | | | | | | | -- | | Always be ready to attend to the needs and wants of the wanty and | | needy. | | | | Dave | | | | | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
=NT Times / Upper Delaware River= | InfoAge | Fly Fishing | 0 | June 25th, 2004 02:18 PM |
LA Times Article | Sierra Club and fishermen | Outdoors Magazine | Fly Fishing | 2 | January 21st, 2004 05:50 PM |
LA Times Article | Sierra Club with respect to anglers | Outdoors Magazine | General Discussion | 0 | January 21st, 2004 03:14 PM |
LA Times Article | Sierra Club with respect to anglers | Outdoors Magazine | Bass Fishing | 0 | January 21st, 2004 03:14 PM |