A little TV fishin'

Tim Lysyk wrote:
rw wrote:

Tim Lysyk wrote:


Getting fish on the reel is only worthwhile for the larger fish. I
enjoy playing fish on the reel, but I don't think the trout care one
way or the other.



Dishonorable. And unethical.


Why?

Ask 40.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Tim Lysyk wrote:
rw wrote:

Tim Lysyk wrote:


Getting fish on the reel is only worthwhile for the larger fish. I
enjoy playing fish on the reel, but I don't think the trout care one
way or the other.



Dishonorable. And unethical.


Why?

Ask 40.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
rw wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Getting fish on the reel is only worthwhile for the larger fish. I
enjoy playing fish on the reel, but I don't think the trout care one
way or the other.

Dishonorable. And unethical.

Why?

Ask 40.

There is honor is doing things right, and **FOR ME** putting the
fish on the reel is doing fly fishing right. You hardly ever know
which fish is going to be good size and which is not so it's good
practice to use proper technique every time. Part of proper
technique is never having more line outside the reel than you can
retrieve when you get a fish on. There is honor in doing things
right as opposed to half-assed and slapdash.

This attitude, or more accurately this attitude of *MINE*, caused
wee Willi Loehman to have one of his squealing hissy fits. In
other words, the usual roff hyperbole and nonsense. Bottom line,
Barnard's a putz and he's just trying to stir up old **** because
he's not creative, witty or smart enough to stir up any new ****
of his own.

--
Ken Fortenberry

rw wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
rw wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Getting fish on the reel is only worthwhile for the larger fish. I
enjoy playing fish on the reel, but I don't think the trout care one
way or the other.

Dishonorable. And unethical.

Why?

Ask 40.

There is honor is doing things right, and **FOR ME** putting the
fish on the reel is doing fly fishing right. You hardly ever know
which fish is going to be good size and which is not so it's good
practice to use proper technique every time. Part of proper
technique is never having more line outside the reel than you can
retrieve when you get a fish on. There is honor in doing things
right as opposed to half-assed and slapdash.

This attitude, or more accurately this attitude of *MINE*, caused
wee Willi Loehman to have one of his squealing hissy fits. In
other words, the usual roff hyperbole and nonsense. Bottom line,
Barnard's a putz and he's just trying to stir up old **** because
he's not creative, witty or smart enough to stir up any new ****
of his own.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. com...
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Getting fish on the reel is only worthwhile for the larger fish. I
enjoy playing fish on the reel, but I don't think the trout care one
way or the other.

Why?

Ken Fortenberry

And there you have it! Like you I don't think the trout really care either, and even
if it did, it wouldn't matter, as we are the one's who are hookin' the trout and not
the other way around.

Mark

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. com...
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Getting fish on the reel is only worthwhile for the larger fish. I
enjoy playing fish on the reel, but I don't think the trout care one
way or the other.

Why?

Ken Fortenberry

And there you have it! Like you I don't think the trout really care either, and even
if it did, it wouldn't matter, as we are the one's who are hookin' the trout and not
the other way around.

Mark

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. com...
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Tim Lysyk wrote:
Getting fish on the reel is only worthwhile for the larger fish. I
enjoy playing fish on the reel, but I don't think the trout care one
way or the other.

Why?

Ken Fortenberry

And there you have it! Like you I don't think the trout really care either, and even
if it did, it wouldn't matter, as we are the one's who are hookin' the trout and not
the other way around.

Mark

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. com...

You hardly ever know
which fish is going to be good size and which is not

You, who? Me? I almost always know within two seconds. What am I doing
wrong?

so it's good
practice to use proper technique every time.

You've forgotten, haven't you? Many of us have seen you fish.

Wolfgang
whose mama always said proper is as proper does.

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. com...

You hardly ever know
which fish is going to be good size and which is not

You, who? Me? I almost always know within two seconds. What am I doing
wrong?

so it's good
practice to use proper technique every time.

You've forgotten, haven't you? Many of us have seen you fish.

Wolfgang
whose mama always said proper is as proper does.

Mark Bowen wrote:


Has there been an outcome to that sad affair yet?

nope...federal judge issued a preliminary injunction stopping land
acquisitions pending better evidence on environmental/wildlife impact.
it's interesting watching the military fight with struggling eastern nc
towns, poor farmers, and rich charlotte lawyers (who are working without
charge or fee), with one of jesse helms' handpicked judges right in the
middle. the navy never had a chance. g



Contact me

will do. we'll walk a bit farther before we start fishing this
time...and, you did say you discovered a trail out didn't you? g

....probably in the next two or three weeks, and might have to be a saturday.

jeff