3 questions

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:39:46 GMT, Jeff wrote:



Joe McIntosh wrote:

Questin Three-- What is a REAL indian ???? Goverment has a rule--creek
indian association has a rule---census bureau has a rule ---was thinking of
answering Font when he said I was not a real indian but was reminded of a
boss many years ago when i tried to get some attention by verbulizations--he
said " I would not lower myself by arguring with you."


You've indicated you have some part indian ancestry and, from my
personal observation and experience, you are most definitely real. good
enough for me and probably most others of reasonable or normal disposition.

Well, I dunno about reasonable or normal disposition, but as far as I'm
concerned anyone that's as quick a study on the ol' peace pipe can call
himself Injun anytime!

/daytripper (he made some BIG damned clouds, too ;-)

daytripper wrote:
Jeff wrote:
You've indicated you have some part indian ancestry ...

Well, I dunno about reasonable or normal disposition, but as far as I'm
concerned anyone that's as quick a study on the ol' peace pipe can call
himself Injun anytime!

He can call himself whatever the hell he wants but unless
Indians have taken to wearing hoods and sheets the so-called
"Indian Joe" ain't no Indian.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:19:33 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

daytripper wrote:
Jeff wrote:
You've indicated you have some part indian ancestry ...

Well, I dunno about reasonable or normal disposition, but as far as I'm
concerned anyone that's as quick a study on the ol' peace pipe can call
himself Injun anytime!

He can call himself whatever the hell he wants but unless
Indians have taken to wearing hoods and sheets the so-called
"Indian Joe" ain't no Indian.

Perhaps he was just trying to pass at the time?

/daytripper (And there is that part about reasonable or normal disposition ;-)

daytripper wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
daytripper wrote:
Well, I dunno about reasonable or normal disposition, but as far as I'm
concerned anyone that's as quick a study on the ol' peace pipe can call
himself Injun anytime!

He can call himself whatever the hell he wants but unless
Indians have taken to wearing hoods and sheets the so-called
"Indian Joe" ain't no Indian.

Perhaps he was just trying to pass at the time?

/daytripper (And there is that part about reasonable or normal disposition ;-)

Reasonable and normal doesn't include apologia for racists.
You were there and know that he doesn't limit his racial
slurs to Native American women.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:34:53 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

daytripper wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
daytripper wrote:
Well, I dunno about reasonable or normal disposition, but as far as I'm
concerned anyone that's as quick a study on the ol' peace pipe can call
himself Injun anytime!

He can call himself whatever the hell he wants but unless
Indians have taken to wearing hoods and sheets the so-called
"Indian Joe" ain't no Indian.

Perhaps he was just trying to pass at the time?

/daytripper (And there is that part about reasonable or normal disposition ;-)

Reasonable and normal doesn't include apologia for racists.
You were there and know that he doesn't limit his racial
slurs to Native American women.

I'm not apologizing for anyone - god knows if I was to apologize for everyone
that uses racial slurs it'd be more than a full time job.

But, in truth, I don't remember hearing IJ speak disparagingly about anyone,
"impolite" vernacular notwithstanding...

/daytripper (just calling it as I sees it. tioli...)

daytripper wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Reasonable and normal doesn't include apologia for racists.
You were there and know that he doesn't limit his racial
slurs to Native American women.

I'm not apologizing for anyone - god knows if I was to apologize for everyone
that uses racial slurs it'd be more than a full time job.

But, in truth, I don't remember hearing IJ speak disparagingly about anyone,
"impolite" vernacular notwithstanding...

/daytripper (just calling it as I sees it. tioli...)

Well, the 'N' word and the 'S' word are both disparaging
enough for me, "vernacular" notwithstanding. I think the
so-called "Indian Joe" is a full of **** piece of ****.
You can reasonably disagree with piece of ****, but if
you're really calling it as you see it, I don't know how
you could honestly disagree with full of ****.

And yeah, take it or leave it.

--
Ken Fortenberry

daytripper wrote:

I'm not apologizing for anyone - god knows if I was to apologize for everyone
that uses racial slurs it'd be more than a full time job.

But, in truth, I don't remember hearing IJ speak disparagingly about anyone,
"impolite" vernacular notwithstanding...

/daytripper (just calling it as I sees it. tioli...)

IJ seems like an OK guy to me, even though I sense he doesn't like me
very much. :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

daytripper wrote:

I'm not apologizing for anyone - god knows if I was to apologize for everyone
that uses racial slurs it'd be more than a full time job.

But, in truth, I don't remember hearing IJ speak disparagingly about anyone,
"impolite" vernacular notwithstanding...

/daytripper (just calling it as I sees it. tioli...)

IJ seems like an OK guy to me, even though I sense he doesn't like me
very much. :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

daytripper wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Reasonable and normal doesn't include apologia for racists.
You were there and know that he doesn't limit his racial
slurs to Native American women.

I'm not apologizing for anyone - god knows if I was to apologize for everyone
that uses racial slurs it'd be more than a full time job.

But, in truth, I don't remember hearing IJ speak disparagingly about anyone,
"impolite" vernacular notwithstanding...

/daytripper (just calling it as I sees it. tioli...)

Well, the 'N' word and the 'S' word are both disparaging
enough for me, "vernacular" notwithstanding. I think the
so-called "Indian Joe" is a full of **** piece of ****.
You can reasonably disagree with piece of ****, but if
you're really calling it as you see it, I don't know how
you could honestly disagree with full of ****.

And yeah, take it or leave it.

--
Ken Fortenberry

daytripper wrote:

I'm not apologizing for anyone - god knows if I was to apologize for everyone
that uses racial slurs it'd be more than a full time job.

But, in truth, I don't remember hearing IJ speak disparagingly about anyone,
"impolite" vernacular notwithstanding...

/daytripper (just calling it as I sees it. tioli...)

IJ seems like an OK guy to me, even though I sense he doesn't like me
very much. :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.