![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:06:57 +0100, "riverman"
wrote: http://tinyurl.com/4xmnh What do you guys think: would it be possible for an AlQueda type to pass info on ROFF without being noticed? It seems to me that just about every Usenet site that I know of has its 'residents' who would notice newbies having conversations on the side. Its only anonymous to those who aren't there. --riverman Trolls. SPAMmers. Both drop in on newsgroups everywhere and are seldom paid much attention unless they hang around and self justify. However, chat rooms are more reasonable for instant communication and Web pages and binaries much more reasonable for passing on longer term stuff. I've only ever examined any chat rooms briefly and at loooong intervals (every few years is more than enough for me), but they allow reasonable privacy. I don't know if the persons running the channel can see when new users drop in, but they could go right into more of the "Hey, any gurlz on here 2nite?" crap and all that and drive almost any drop in visitor away. I play one game on Yahoo that has an attached chat part. I turn it off as soon as the game's entirely loaded, but catch some of it. Gag. It wouldn't take much in way of disguise for a few people to be on there and act as if they're talking up a favorite band, perhaps named "Fear and Death", and asking what its tour stops will be. One could pop in cities, dates, times, and even locations. "Yeah, they'll be in Boston on the 28th. That club down on the corner of 1st street and 15th avenue. Afternoon for the kiddie concert. 3pm for the warm up band, "Destruction Zone" and then the main act at 4pm." Of course they'd have to get up on chat room English variants, which I'm not, in spite of the small example above, but that shouldn't be too hard. Luckily, the terrorists seem to be short on imagination. There are so many awful things they could do so easily that they've not yet done. Or else I have a very vivid imagination and more paranoia than a group with Rumsfeld and Ashcroft and 40 neocons and Vince Foster's killer combined. PS: the part about Foster's killer is fiction. I, in the small amount of time I considered it, do believe he offed himself. Maybe not where he was found, though... Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:06:57 +0100, "riverman"
wrote: http://tinyurl.com/4xmnh What do you guys think: would it be possible for an AlQueda type to pass info on ROFF without being noticed? It seems to me that just about every Usenet site that I know of has its 'residents' who would notice newbies having conversations on the side. Its only anonymous to those who aren't there. --riverman Trolls. SPAMmers. Both drop in on newsgroups everywhere and are seldom paid much attention unless they hang around and self justify. However, chat rooms are more reasonable for instant communication and Web pages and binaries much more reasonable for passing on longer term stuff. I've only ever examined any chat rooms briefly and at loooong intervals (every few years is more than enough for me), but they allow reasonable privacy. I don't know if the persons running the channel can see when new users drop in, but they could go right into more of the "Hey, any gurlz on here 2nite?" crap and all that and drive almost any drop in visitor away. I play one game on Yahoo that has an attached chat part. I turn it off as soon as the game's entirely loaded, but catch some of it. Gag. It wouldn't take much in way of disguise for a few people to be on there and act as if they're talking up a favorite band, perhaps named "Fear and Death", and asking what its tour stops will be. One could pop in cities, dates, times, and even locations. "Yeah, they'll be in Boston on the 28th. That club down on the corner of 1st street and 15th avenue. Afternoon for the kiddie concert. 3pm for the warm up band, "Destruction Zone" and then the main act at 4pm." Of course they'd have to get up on chat room English variants, which I'm not, in spite of the small example above, but that shouldn't be too hard. Luckily, the terrorists seem to be short on imagination. There are so many awful things they could do so easily that they've not yet done. Or else I have a very vivid imagination and more paranoia than a group with Rumsfeld and Ashcroft and 40 neocons and Vince Foster's killer combined. PS: the part about Foster's killer is fiction. I, in the small amount of time I considered it, do believe he offed himself. Maybe not where he was found, though... Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Cyli
Luckily, the terrorists seem to be short on imagination. There are so many awful things they could do so easily that they've not yet done. Or else I have a very vivid imagination and more paranoia than a group with Rumsfeld and Ashcroft and 40 neocons and Vince Foster's killer combined. We must be on the same wavelength. I have thought of a number of relatively low cost/low tech activities that would strike fear into the heart of most Americans, but thankfully the terrorists have not. I thought we had one going a while back, buy it turned out to be home grown whackos. George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , George Adams
wrote: From: Cyli Luckily, the terrorists seem to be short on imagination. There are so many awful things they could do so easily that they've not yet done. Or else I have a very vivid imagination and more paranoia than a group with Rumsfeld and Ashcroft and 40 neocons and Vince Foster's killer combined. We must be on the same wavelength. I have thought of a number of relatively low cost/low tech activities that would strike fear into the heart of most Americans, but thankfully the terrorists have not. I thought we had one going a while back, buy it turned out to be home grown whackos. George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller I must say that, as someone who grew up, and then brought up two children, in a city where I'd hear machine-gun fire each evening , and that was constantly being bombed by terrorists (many funded from New York and Boston) I am utterly terrified by the current obsession with terrorists in the US. How many of you have ever seen a terrorist bomb go off? Or seen anyone shot or killed in a terrorist incident? (I've seen lots and lots and lots). How many of you have known someone who was killed in a road accident? Get a life guys, stop being paranoid, and killing innocent people with your paranoia. Go fishing. Lazarus -- Remover the rock from the email address |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lazarus Cooke" wrote Get a life guys, stop being paranoid, and killing innocent people with your paranoia. Go fishing. Lazarus Thank you and I mean that sincerely .... this country is so paranoid it is it's own worst enemy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lazarus Cooke" wrote Get a life guys, stop being paranoid, and killing innocent people with your paranoia. Go fishing. Lazarus Thank you and I mean that sincerely .... this country is so paranoid it is it's own worst enemy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lazarus writes:
I am utterly terrified by the current obsession with terrorists in the US. I agree. In our worst year, most Americans were more likely to be struck by lightning. What you may or may not see is that here in the US, a combination of the mass media and our own elected officials have fanned the paranoia to this level for their own selfish purposes(ie: monetary gain, and staying in office). Although fortunate not to have encountered such surroundings, I have spoken, fished and spent time with quite a few who grew up in the Middle East and Northern Ireland. I look at my own nation and realize we are weak, soft people at times. Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lazarus writes:
I am utterly terrified by the current obsession with terrorists in the US. I agree. In our worst year, most Americans were more likely to be struck by lightning. What you may or may not see is that here in the US, a combination of the mass media and our own elected officials have fanned the paranoia to this level for their own selfish purposes(ie: monetary gain, and staying in office). Although fortunate not to have encountered such surroundings, I have spoken, fished and spent time with quite a few who grew up in the Middle East and Northern Ireland. I look at my own nation and realize we are weak, soft people at times. Tom |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Littleton wrote:
Lazarus writes: I am utterly terrified by the current obsession with terrorists in the US. I agree. In our worst year, most Americans were more likely to be struck by lightning. What you may or may not see is that here in the US, a combination of the mass media and our own elected officials have fanned the paranoia to this level for their own selfish purposes(ie: monetary gain, and staying in office). Although fortunate not to have encountered such surroundings, I have spoken, fished and spent time with quite a few who grew up in the Middle East and Northern Ireland. I look at my own nation and realize we are weak, soft people at times. Tom I have trouble with you labeling people as soft and weak because they live with peace. If that's true, I think I'll take soft and weak. Willi |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Littleton wrote:
Lazarus writes: I am utterly terrified by the current obsession with terrorists in the US. I agree. In our worst year, most Americans were more likely to be struck by lightning. What you may or may not see is that here in the US, a combination of the mass media and our own elected officials have fanned the paranoia to this level for their own selfish purposes(ie: monetary gain, and staying in office). Although fortunate not to have encountered such surroundings, I have spoken, fished and spent time with quite a few who grew up in the Middle East and Northern Ireland. I look at my own nation and realize we are weak, soft people at times. Tom I have trouble with you labeling people as soft and weak because they live with peace. If that's true, I think I'll take soft and weak. Willi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yellowstone/Montana regulations and the ROFF Banner.. | Mike Makela | Fly Fishing | 6 | June 20th, 2004 07:22 AM |
ROFF CD's? | Lo Dolce Pesca | Fly Fishing | 16 | April 18th, 2004 10:59 PM |
Virus, ROFF Gehrke etc. | Mike Connor | Fly Fishing | 1 | February 12th, 2004 03:10 PM |
FS2004 - Great ROFF Fly Swap - Last chance! | rb608 | Fly Fishing | 0 | January 13th, 2004 10:35 PM |
ROFF and making friends | Roger Ohlund | Fly Fishing | 124 | January 7th, 2004 05:53 PM |