is Bush anti- fly fishing?

On 15 Oct 2004 15:23:43 -0700, (katie star)
wrote:

wrote in message . ..
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:12:52 -0600, Willi & Sue
wrote:


Bush is NOT a friend of our fisheries.

Absolutely correct - he isn't. But he isn't an enemy of them, either.
Last I checked, it isn't in the job description, and the same document
provides for no right(s) as to folks being able to fish on public
waters. The fact that it is available is much like a driver's license,
a hunting license, etc. - a privilege.

Bush isnt a enemy? You are very ignorant.

Yeah, but I'm younger, ric...oh, screw it - why don't you just call
"gcameron" and make an appointment to go **** a goat...

wrote in message . ..
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:12:52 -0600, Willi & Sue
wrote:


Bush is NOT a friend of our fisheries.

Absolutely correct - he isn't. But he isn't an enemy of them, either.
Last I checked, it isn't in the job description, and the same document
provides for no right(s) as to folks being able to fish on public
waters. The fact that it is available is much like a driver's license,
a hunting license, etc. - a privilege.

Bush isnt a enemy? You are very ignorant.
President Bush appointed
Mark Rey as the Undersecretary for Natural Resources and the
Environment. Rey is now responsible for the care and management of our
National Forests and Grasslands. Mark Rey was keynote speaker for
Allicance for America. What is their views on the environment?
"Our goal is to destroy, to eradicate the environmental movement. We
want to be able to exploit the environment for private gain,
absolutely."

Bush has renamed timber harvest plans to "fire reduction plans". The
greatest risk of fire is the angeles forest which borders southern
california. This area has little desirable lumber tho. No surprise
that all of southern california gets less funding that miniscule towns
in alaska.

Another key Bush appointe was a former lawyer for the timber industry
(forget his name). He advocated treating hatchery salmon and
steelhead as counting as wild fish. Now Bush has him running in
charge of our fisheries (the NOA?). He has no education in the
sciences, wildlife, or biology, he was a lawyer for timber so they
could rape the environment to make money. Now he is in charge of
protecting the environment. No surprise he is advocating rules that
could destroy our anadromous waterways.

I think you're the one that needs to research Bush's and his Secretary
of the Interior, Gale Norton's record on environment protection as a
whole (ie look at their attempts to repeal and weaken the Clean
Water Act and the Clean Air Act) as well as their free market approach
to OUR National lands (ie the ONLY value our National lands have are
the money that they can generate).


Good to see you Willi.

I'm not going to defend Bush, Kerry or Barney on enviornmental issues.
I just want people to research the facts from all sites, including the
EPA, FS, BLM, and state health department issues. Take a look at the
discharge and remediation laws associated with many sites that are so
called un-friendly to the environment.

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:12:52 -0600, Willi & Sue
wrote:


Bush is NOT a friend of our fisheries.

Absolutely correct - he isn't. But he isn't an enemy of them, either.
Last I checked, it isn't in the job description, and the same document
provides for no right(s) as to folks being able to fish on public
waters. The fact that it is available is much like a driver's license,
a hunting license, etc. - a privilege.

TC,
R

bouncer wrote:

To the original poster. Do your homework on this issue. I've
personally never seen so many waterways in the west in such fine shape.
Oh wait. The drought has caused problems with many rivers, but that
isn't a result of any current policies implemented by Bush. We should
be excited, as a nation, that the riverways continue to improve every
year.

That is flat wrong. It depends, of course, on what waterways you've seen
and for how long you've seen them. For example, the Bush administration
fighting efforts to restore the salmon and steelhead runs in the Pacific
Northwest. Their court-ordered draft federal salmon plan rewrite is a
joke. Fortunately, it's getting lots of opposition from Congress,
fishing communities, tribes, businesses, and the press.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

wrote...
That is flat wrong. It depends, of course, on what waterways you've seen
and for how long you've seen them. For example, the Bush administration
fighting efforts to restore the salmon and steelhead runs in the Pacific
Northwest. Their court-ordered draft federal salmon plan rewrite is a
joke. Fortunately, it's getting lots of opposition from Congress,
fishing communities, tribes, businesses, and the press.

You're still voting for Bush though, right? :-)
--
Warren
(use troutbum_mt and earth(nospam)link dot net to reply via email)

In article ,
wrote:


You're still voting for Bush though, right? :-)

Warren, I m sure you are correct in that, RW would never go back
on the great compromise worked out at the clave to end political
disagreement on Roff.
Tho when do you start your " Sensitivity classes" as that was the
other half of the bargain?

MT

wrote...
Warren, I m sure you are correct in that, RW would never go back
on the great compromise worked out at the clave to end political
disagreement on Roff.
Tho when do you start your " Sensitivity classes" as that was the
other half of the bargain?

I have already started and the classes are going pretty damn good. This
girl was complaining that the wire of her bra was cutting into her so I
told her that I felt her pain and proceeded to give her a massage. The
teacher was very impressed at how sensitive I was and gave me 30 extra
credit points for being very "Clintonian." With the e/c points, I now
have a C- in the class while the chick and I have become *very* close
friends. Bonk chicca bomp bomp..... Woohoo! :-)
--
Warren (AMADP)
(use troutbum_mt and earth(nospam)link dot net to reply via email)

wrote...
Warren, I m sure you are correct in that, RW would never go back
on the great compromise worked out at the clave to end political
disagreement on Roff.
Tho when do you start your " Sensitivity classes" as that was the
other half of the bargain?

I have already started and the classes are going pretty damn good. This
girl was complaining that the wire of her bra was cutting into her so I
told her that I felt her pain and proceeded to give her a massage. The
teacher was very impressed at how sensitive I was and gave me 30 extra
credit points for being very "Clintonian." With the e/c points, I now
have a C- in the class while the chick and I have become *very* close
friends. Bonk chicca bomp bomp..... Woohoo! :-)
--
Warren (AMADP)
(use troutbum_mt and earth(nospam)link dot net to reply via email)

wrote...
That is flat wrong. It depends, of course, on what waterways you've seen
and for how long you've seen them. For example, the Bush administration
fighting efforts to restore the salmon and steelhead runs in the Pacific
Northwest. Their court-ordered draft federal salmon plan rewrite is a
joke. Fortunately, it's getting lots of opposition from Congress,
fishing communities, tribes, businesses, and the press.

You're still voting for Bush though, right? :-)
--
Warren
(use troutbum_mt and earth(nospam)link dot net to reply via email)